While
“Mad Dog” Mattis was by no means a “hero,” it is almost a
given that his replacement will be far more pro-war and
pro-intervention than the outgoing secretary of defense.
by
Whitney Webb
Part
1
On
Thursday, President Donald Trump announced via Twitter that Secretary
of Defense James “Mad Dog” Mattis would be “retiring” in
February and that a replacement for Mattis would soon be named.
Mattis’
departure had been the subject of speculation since late June, when
it was reported that Mattis was already being kept out of the loop on
major administration decisions such as the unilateral withdrawal from
the Iran nuclear deal, which Mattis had supported keeping intact.
Rumors of Mattis’ exit as the Pentagon’s top official were then
revived in September when it was reported that Trump was “actively
discussing” his replacement.
Many top
U.S. politicians — both Democrat and Republican — have mourned
Mattis’ resignation. Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) called news of Mattis’
departure “scary” and added that he “has been an island of
stability amidst the chaos of the Trump administration.” Sen.
Mitch McConnell (R-KY) also somberly greeted the news, stating that
he “was sorry to learn that Secretary Mattis […] will soon
depart the administration,” and adding that he was
“particularly distressed that he is resigning due to sharp
differences with the president on these and other key aspects of
America’s global leadership.”
Similarly,
major U.S. media outlets have long praised Mattis for being the “last
adult in the room” in the White House and for allegedly helping
to “constrain an unpredictable president.” With Mattis
gone, top news outlets have warned that Trump is now “unbound.”
During
his tenure, Mattis has been a proponent of many policies that hardly
warrant his current treatment by the media and the political
establishment as a heroic figure. Though Mattis opposed some of
Trump’s policy decisions — most notably the recognition of
Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and the administration’s
withdrawal from the Iran deal — Mattis supported the genocidal
Saudi-led and U.S.-backed war in Yemen up until late last month,
threatened North Korea with “the destruction of its people,”
and oversaw the U.S. bombings of Iraq’s Mosul and Syria’s Raqqa.
The operation in Mosul alone was believed to have killed at least
6,000 civilians.
While
Mattis was by no means a “hero,” it is almost a given that his
replacement will be far more pro-war and pro-intervention than the
outgoing secretary of defense, who was nicknamed “Mad Dog” for
leading the U.S. attack on Iraq’s Fallujah in 2004.
Indeed,
back in September and now following news of Mattis’ resignation,
the top contenders for the top position at the Pentagon and now being
named including Senator Lindsey Graham and David Petraeus. However, a
source close to the President cited by FOX News — Trump’s news
outlet of choice — insists that the most likely candidates for
Mattis’ post are Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR), and retired General
John “Jack” Keane.
Source,
links:
https://www.mintpressnews.com/both-leading-candidates-to-replace-mattis-are-maximum-war-hawks/253267/
[2] [3] [4] [5]
[2] [3] [4] [5]
Comments
Post a Comment