Skip to main content

Hold the front page: the reporters are missing

So much of mainstream journalism has descended to the level of a cult-like formula of bias, hearsay and omission. Subjectivism is all; slogans and outrage are proof enough. What matters is “perception,” says John Pilger.

by John Pilger

The death of Robert Parry earlier this year felt like a farewell to the age of the reporter. Parry was “a trailblazer for independent journalism”, wrote Seymour Hersh, with whom he shared much in common.

Hersh revealed the My Lai massacre in Vietnam and the secret bombing of Cambodia, Parry exposed Iran-Contra, a drugs and gun-running conspiracy that led to the White House. In 2016, they separately produced compelling evidence that the Assad government in Syria had not used chemical weapons. They were not forgiven.

Driven from the “mainstream”, Hersh must publish his work outside the United States. Parry set up his own independent news website Consortium News, where, in a final piece following a stroke, he referred to journalism’s veneration of “approved opinions” while “unapproved evidence is brushed aside or disparaged regardless of its quality.

Although journalism was always a loose extension of establishment power, something has changed in recent years. Dissent tolerated when I joined a national newspaper in Britain in the 1960s has regressed to a metaphoric underground as liberal capitalism moves towards a form of corporate dictatorship. This is a seismic shift, with journalists policing the new “groupthink”, as Parry called it, dispensing its myths and distractions, pursuing its enemies.

Witness the witch-hunts against refugees and immigrants, the willful abandonment by the “MeToo” zealots of our oldest freedom, presumption of innocence, the anti-Russia racism and anti-Brexit hysteria, the growing anti-China campaign and the suppression of a warning of world war.

With many if not most independent journalists barred or ejected from the “mainstream”, a corner of the Internet has become a vital source of disclosure and evidence-based analysis: true journalism sites such as wikileaks.org, consortiumnews.com, wsws.org, truthdig.com, globalresearch.org, counterpunch.org and informationclearinghouse.com are required reading for those trying to make sense of a world in which science and technology advance wondrously while political and economic life in the fearful “democracies” regress behind a media facade of narcissistic spectacle.

Propaganda Blitz

In Britain, just one website offers consistently independent media criticism. This is the remarkable Media Lens — remarkable partly because its founders and editors as well as its only writers, David Edwards and David Cromwell, since 2001 have concentrated their gaze not on the usual suspects, the Tory press, but the paragons of reputable liberal journalism: the BBC, The Guardian, Channel 4 News.

Their method is simple. Meticulous in their research, they are respectful and polite when they ask why a journalist why he or she produced such a one-sided report, or failed to disclose essential facts or promoted discredited myths.

The replies they receive are often defensive, at times abusive; some are hysterical, as if they have pushed back a screen on a protected species.

I would say Media Lens has shattered a silence about corporate journalism. Like Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman in Manufacturing Consent, they represent a Fifth Estate that deconstructs and demystifies the media’s power.

What is especially interesting about them is that neither is a journalist. David Edwards is a former teacher, David Cromwell is an oceanographer. Yet, their understanding of the morality of journalism — a term rarely used; let’s call it true objectivity — is a bracing quality of their online Media Lens dispatches.

I think their work is heroic and I would place a copy of their just published book, Propaganda Blitz, in every journalism school that services the corporate system, as they all do.

Take the chapter, Dismantling the National Health Service, in which Edwards and Cromwell describe the critical part played by journalists in the crisis facing Britain’s pioneering health service.

The NHS crisis is the product of a political and media construct known as “austerity”, with its deceitful, weasel language of “efficiency savings” (the BBC term for slashing public expenditure) and “hard choices” (the willful destruction of the premises of civilized life in modern Britain).

Austerity” is an invention. Britain is a rich country with a debt owed by its crooked banks, not its people. The resources that would comfortably fund the National Health Service have been stolen in broad daylight by the few allowed to avoid and evade billions in taxes.

Using a vocabulary of corporate euphemisms, the publicly-funded Health Service is being deliberately run down by free market fanatics, to justify its selling-off. The Labour Party of Jeremy Corbyn may appear to oppose this, but is it? The answer is very likely no. Little of any of this is alluded to in the media, let alone explained.

Edwards and Cromwell have dissected the 2012 Health and Social Care Act, whose innocuous title belies its dire consequences. Unknown to most of the population, the Act ends the legal obligation of British governments to provide universal free health care: the bedrock on which the NHS was set up following the Second World War. Private companies can now insinuate themselves into the NHS, piece by piece.

Where, asks Edwards and Cromwell, was the BBC while this momentous Bill was making its way through Parliament? With a statutory commitment to “providing a breadth of view” and to properly inform the public of “matters of public policy,” the BBC never spelt out the threat posed to one of the nation’s most cherished institutions. A BBC headline said: “Bill which gives power to GPs passes.” This was pure state propaganda.

Media and Iraq Invasion

There is a striking similarity with the BBC’s coverage of Prime Minister Tony Blair’s lawless invasion of Iraq in 2003, which left a million dead and many more dispossessed. A study by the University of Wales, Cardiff, found that the BBC reflected the government line “overwhelmingly” while relegating reports of civilian suffering. A Media Tenor study placed the BBC at the bottom of a league of western broadcasters in the time they gave to opponents of the invasion. The corporation’s much-vaunted “principle” of impartiality was never a consideration.

One of the most telling chapters in Propaganda Blitz describes the smear campaigns mounted by journalists against dissenters, political mavericks and whistleblowers. The Guardian’s campaign against the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is the most disturbing. Assange, whose epic WikiLeaks disclosures brought fame, journalism prizes and largesse to The Guardian, was abandoned when he was no longer useful. He was then subjected to a vituperative – and cowardly — onslaught of a kind I have rarely known.

With not a penny going to WikiLeaks, a hyped Guardian book led to a lucrative Hollywood movie deal. The book’s authors, Luke Harding and David Leigh, gratuitously described Assange as a “damaged personality” and “callous.” They also disclosed the secret password he had given the paper in confidence, which was designed to protect a digital file containing the U.S. embassy cables.

With Assange now trapped in the Ecuadorean embassy, Harding, standing among the police outside, gloated on his blog that “Scotland Yard may get the last laugh.

The Guardian columnist Suzanne Moore wrote, “I bet Assange is stuffing himself full of flattened guinea pigs. He really is the most massive turd.

Moore, who describes herself as a feminist, later complained that, after attacking Assange, she had suffered “vile abuse.” Edwards and Cromwell wrote to her: “That’s a real shame, sorry to hear that. But how would you describe calling someone ‘the most massive turd’? Vile abuse?

Moore replied that no, she would not, adding, “I would advise you to stop being so bloody patronizing.” Her former Guardian colleague James Ball wrote, “It’s difficult to imagine what Ecuador’s London embassy smells like more than five and a half years after Julian Assange moved in.

Such slow-witted viciousness appeared in a newspaper described by its editor, Katharine Viner, as “thoughtful and progressive.” What is the root of this vindictiveness? Is it jealousy, a perverse recognition that Assange has achieved more journalistic firsts than his snipers can claim in a lifetime? Is it that he refuses to be “one of us” and shames those who have long sold out the independence of journalism?

Journalism students should study this to understand that the source of “fake news” is not only trollism, or the likes of Fox News, or Donald Trump, but a journalism self-anointed with a false respectability: a liberal journalism that claims to challenge corrupt state power but, in reality, courts and protects it, and colludes with it. The amorality of the years of Tony Blair, whom The Guardian has failed to rehabilitate, is its echo.

[It is] an age in which people yearn for new ideas and fresh alternatives,” wrote Katharine Viner. Her political writer Jonathan Freedland dismissed the yearning of young people who supported the modest policies of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn as “a form of narcissism.

How did this man ….,” brayed the Guardian‘s Zoe Williams, “get on the ballot in the first place?” A choir of the paper’s precocious windbags joined in, thereafter queuing to fall on their blunt swords when Corbyn came close to winning the 2017 general election in spite of the media.

Complex stories are reported to a cult-like formula of bias, hearsay and omission: Brexit, Venezuela, Russia, Syria. On Syria, only the investigations of a group of independent journalists have countered this, revealing the network of Anglo-American backing of jihadists in Syria, including those related to ISIS.

Supported by a “psyops” campaign funded by the British Foreign Office and the U.S. Agency for International Development, the aim is to hoodwink the Western public and speed the overthrow of the government in Damascus, regardless of the medieval alternative and the risk of war with Russia.

The Syria Campaign, set up by a New York PR agency called Purpose, funds a group known as the White Helmets, who claim falsely to be “Syria Civil Defense” and are seen uncritically on TV news and social media, apparently rescuing the victims of bombing, which they film and edit themselves, though viewers are unlikely to be told this. George Clooney is a fan.

The White Helmets are appendages to the jihadists with whom they share addresses. Their media-smart uniforms and equipment are supplied by their Western paymasters. That their exploits are not questioned by major news organizations is an indication of how deep the influence of state-backed PR now runs in the media. As Robert Fisk noted recently, no “mainstream” reporter reports Syria.

In what is known as a hatchet job, a Guardian reporter based in San Francisco, Olivia Solon, who has never visited Syria, was allowed to smear the substantiated investigative work of journalists Vanessa Beeley and Eva Bartlett on the White Helmets as “propagated online by a network of anti-imperialist activists, conspiracy theorists and trolls with the support of the Russian government.

This abuse was published without permitting a single correction, let alone a right-of-reply. The Guardian Comment page was blocked, as Edwards and Cromwell document. I saw the list of questions Solon sent to Beeley, which reads like a McCarthyite charge sheet — “Have you ever been invited to North Korea?

So much of the mainstream has descended to this level. Subjectivism is all; slogans and outrage are proof enough. What matters is the “perception.”

When he was U.S. commander in Afghanistan, General David Petraeus declared what he called “a war of perception… conducted continuously using the news media.” What really mattered was not the facts but the way the story played in the United States. The undeclared enemy was, as always, an informed and critical public at home.

Nothing has changed. In the 1970s, I met Leni Riefenstahl, Hitler’s film-maker, whose propaganda mesmerized the German public.

She told me the “messages” of her films were dependent not on “orders from above”, but on the “submissive void” of an uninformed public.

Did that include the liberal, educated bourgeoisie?” I asked.

Everyone,” she said. “Propaganda always wins, if you allow it.

Source, links:


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why the US rushed to propagate the 'naval mine' scenario to explain recent attacks on two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman

globinfo freexchange

The incident of the recent attack against two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman elevated the heat between the US and Iran. Naturally, the attack also produced some level of turmoil in the oil global market.

Trump's hostile attitude against Iran was clearly evident even before his election. His totally unjustifiable and completely incomprehensible action to kill the Iran nuclear deal, destroyed any remnants of US reliability. Consequently, even the US Western allies refused to follow this evidently counterproductive strategy.

Under these circumstances and given the endless history of US manufactured incidents used to justify the start of another war, most people rightfully thought that this has been just another false flag operation.

And it makes sense actually. Why the hell Iran would attempt to blow up its relations with Japan in the midst of Japanese PM Shinzo Abe visit in the country? Only the US empire would have reasons to do it in order to force one of its…

Εθνικές εκλογές 2019: τι μας επιφυλάσσει ο νεοφιλελεύθερος εφιάλτης που επιστρέφει δριμύτερος

Οι προβλέψεις φαίνεται να επαληθεύονται εντυπωσιακά. Όπως είχαμε αναφέρει ήδη από το 2016 και αμέσως μετά την εκλογή Μητσοτάκη στην ηγεσία της ΝΔ, το αποτέλεσμα των εσωτερικών εκλογών στη γαλάζια παράταξη έλυνε τα χέρια του άξονα Βρυξελλών-Βερολίνου. Οι γραφειοφασίστες των Βρυξελλών και το διευθυντήριο του Βερολίνου απέκτησαν μια πρώτης τάξεως εφεδρεία σε περίπτωση που τα πράγματα "στράβωναν" με την κυβέρνηση Τσίπρα.  

globinfo freexchange 

Η κυβέρνηση ΣΥΡΙΖΑ έδωσε κάποια μικρά σημάδια ανυπακοής ενάντια στη λιτότητα που επιβάλλει το νεοφιλελεύθερο ιερατείο, ρέποντας 'επικίνδυνα' προς μια πιο φιλολαϊκή πολιτική. Δεν είναι τυχαίο φυσικά ότι τα πρώτα αυτά σημάδια άρχισαν να γίνονται ορατά μόλις η χώρα βγήκε από το πρόγραμμα επιτήρησης που επέβαλε η Τρόικα (έστω και τυπικά).

Παρόλο που το τοπίο καταστροφής στην οικονομία είναι κάτι παραπάνω από ορατό, λόγω των επιβαλλόμενων καταστροφικών πολιτικών του ΔΝΤ, η κυβέρνηση έσπευσε να εκμεταλλευτεί τα διευρυμένα περιθ…

Την ώρα που ο Μητσοτάκης σχεδιάζει ασφαλιστικό Πινοσέτ, ο πιο δημοφιλής υποψήφιος για την Αμερικανική προεδρία κυρήσσει πόλεμο στις ασφαλιστικές

globinfo freexchange

Σοκ και δέος είχαν προκαλέσει οι δηλώσεις Καραγκούνη το Σεπτέμβριο του 18 περί "ασφαλιστικού Πινοσέτ" προλειαίνοντας το έδαφος για τους σχεδιασμούς μιας πιθανής κυβέρνησης Μητσοτάκη. 
Λίγο πριν τις εκλογές της 7ης Ιουλίου, η ΝΔ έδωσε μια πρόγευση του τι πρόκειται να επακολουθήσει στον τομέα της ασφάλισης. Ορισμένα γαλάζια στελέχη προσπάθησαν να διασκεδάσουν τις εντυπώσεις δηλώνοντας ότι δεν πρόκειται να ιδιωτικοποιηθεί ο ασφαλιστικός κλάδος και υπονοώντας (ως συνήθως) ότι τέτοιες υπερβολές οφείλονται στην "Αριστερή προπαγάνδα".

Όμως η απόλυτη αφοσίωση του σκληρού πυρήνα της γαλάζιας παράταξης στη νεοφιλελεύθερη ιδεολογία είναι κάτι παραπάνω από φανερή. Είναι σχεδόν βέβαιο ότι νεοφιλελεύθεροι 'τζιχαντιστές' της δεξιάς ονειρεύονται πλήρη ιδιωτικοποίηση υγείας, ασφάλισης, παιδείας, ως πρώτο πιάτο στο μενού του νεοφιλελεύθερου 'οδοστρωτήρα'.

Οι μιντιακοί γκεμπελίσκοι και τα δεξιά τρολ κραυγάζουν εναντίον της Αριστερής "ιδεοληψί…

Confirmed: the US empire seeks to 'clear' the path for the invasion of Iran

globinfo freexchange

Sometimes it's quite surprising how fast some estimations appear to be confirmed.

Only four days ago, we wrote that the US imperialists know that an all-out war with Iran would equal a suicide. The goal is probably a 'surgical' invasion on the south shores of the country that would last just as long as to permit the US and allies to control the Strait of Hormuz, and therefore, the global oil market. The first step towards such an operation would be the mine-clearing of the strait.

This probably explains why the Western media insisted to circulate the scenario of the 'naval mine'. They want to drag Western leaderships behind US in an operation to clear the mines in the Strait of Hormuz, in the name of global energy security.

Well, we were quite close actually. Three days later, the US leadership attempted a broader global alignment - including rival countries like China - towards the protection of "freedom of navigation in the region". …

The Greeks have just committed suicide by electing the most fanatically neoliberal government ever

globinfo freexchange

The result of the recent Greek national elections will puzzle future historians for decades. The Greek voters gave a clear victory to the conservative right party, New Democracy, which will govern with 158 seats, without the need to make any coalitions.
It could be characterized a "paradoxical" result mainly for two reasons:
First, the voters gave a clear governmental order to one of the traditional powers of the old political system, which are highly responsible for the Greek crisis that erupted in 2010. Several top names of the new government, and even New Democracy leader, Kyriakos Mitsotakis, have been accused of being involved in various corruption scandals, in the not so distant past.
Second, the fact that the voters elected perhaps the most fanatically neoliberal government ever. This means that Mitsotakis administration is expected to implement the brutal neoliberal policies imposed by Greece's creditors to the letter. Recall that those polic…

Masks fall at last: Bernie officially declares war on corporate Dems who seek to survive around Warren

globinfo freexchange

On early June, Politico published an article which actually unfolded, in plain sight, the plans of the corporate branch of the Democratic party to stop Bernie Sanders.
As we wrote back then:

This is an amazingly straight admission by the establishment apparatus, concerning a certain strategy as part of the whole anti-Sanders operation. And it is also clear that Elizabeth Warren is establishment's key player around this strategy.

Perhaps it's not accidental that this article was published right after Elizabeth Warren signaled to the establishment that she will 'play by the rules' at least on some issues, through her neocon-style statement on Julian Assange.

Only a couple of weeks later, Politico revealed Warren's upgraded role in the anti-Sanders operation. According to a new article, "Centrists who once said the senator would lead the party to ruin are coming around to her as an alternative to Bernie Sanders." It seems almost certain …

Σοκ και δέος από την υφυπουργό εργασίας της κυβέρνησης Μητσοτάκη: "καταφέραμε να μειώσουμε πάρα πολύ το κόστος εργασίας" (!!!)

globinfo freexchange
Ήταν Απρίλιος του 2017. Η τότε σύμβουλος μεταρρυθμίσεων του Κυριάκου Μητσοτάκη και νυν υφυπουργός Εργασίας στην κυβέρνησή του, Δόμνα Μιχαηλίδου, δήλωνε στο άκρως φιλικό περιβάλλον του ΣΚΑΙ:
"Η Ελλάδα μεταξύ 2013-2014 ήταν πρωταγωνίστρια στις μεταρρυθμίσεις και στις μεταρρυθμίσεις ανταγωνιστικότητας. Και σύμφωνα με στοιχεία από τον ΟΟΣΑ και σύμφωνα με στοιχεία από την Παγκόσμια Τράπεζα, είχαμε πάρα πολύ μεγάλη άνοδο της ανταγωνιστικότητας.  [...] Καταφέραμε να μειώσουμε πάρα πολύ το κόστος εργασίας. Το εργασιακό μπήκε σε ένα πλαίσιο πιο ευέλικτο, το μισθολογικό μπήκε σε ένα πλαίσιο πολύ πιο σκληρό, οπότε καταφέραμε να μειώσουμε το κόστος εργασίας."

Προσέξτε όμως κάτι πολύ χαρακτηριστικό. Ο δημοσιογράφος του ΣΚΑΙ, πριν κάνει την ερώτησή του, παρουσιάζει ορισμένα στοιχεία που δείχνουν ότι οι χώρες με τα πιο ακριβά μεροκάματα (Ελβετία, Γερμανία) βρίσκονται στην κορυφή του πίνακα της ανταγωνιστικότητας. Επιπλέον, στην επόμενη καρτέλα, παρουσιάζει τ…

Preparing the invasion of Iran: the US empire regroups its proxies in Afghanistan

globinfo freexchange

On the occasion of the recent attack against two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman, we estimated that the US imperialists will follow a certain scenario to achieve primary goal, which is to fully control the Strait of Hormuz. The goal could be achieved through a strategically and geographically restricted, fast-track invasion of Iran.

A certain part of the operation could include some US forces and proxies inside Afghanistan.

As we wrote, already since 2017 the US announced that it will increase the number of US troops in Afghanistan, and one reason probably has to do with Iran. A significant number of US troops on the Iranian eastern border would be very useful. It will be used to keep the Iranian forces busy and gradually weaken the Iranian operational capabilities in an extended attrition war. This will permit the US to gradually secure and establish their presence in the Strait of Hormuz.

This attrition war could be held - and probably would be more effecti…

Ο όχι και τόσο σοφός λαός έδωσε αυτοδυναμία στη χειρότερη δεξιά της μεταπολίτευσης

του system failure
Κυκλοφορεί συχνά-πυκνά το μύθευμα ότι ο λαός είναι σοφός και επιλέγει τους εκπροσώπους του με σοφία. Το συγκεκριμένο κλισέ που αναπαράγεται κοντά σε κάτι άλλα χαριτωμένα του τύπου "στη δημοκρατία δεν υπάρχουν αδιέξοδα", υπονοεί σχεδόν ότι, με κάποιον μυστηριώδη και μεταφυσικό τρόπο, μια ετερόκλητη μάζα εκατομμυρίων ψηφοφόρων καταφέρνει να συνεννοηθεί λίγο πριν από τις κάλπες για να εκλέξει ένα πολιτικά ισορροπημένο κοινοβούλιο, ότι και αν σημαίνει αυτό. 
Στις τελευταίες εκλογές, οι ψηφοφόροι έδωσαν αυτοδυναμία στην πιο νεοφιλελεύθερη δεξιά όλων των εποχών, πράγμα που εκ πρώτης όψεως φαντάζει παράλογο, ειδικά μετά από τις καταστροφικές νεοφιλελεύθερες πολιτικές που επέβαλαν οι δανειστές στα χρόνια της κρίσης. Πολιτικές που έφεραν τη χώρα και την οικονομία σε χειρότερη κατάσταση.  
Φαντάζει ακόμα πιο παράλογο και για το γεγονός ότι οι ψηφοφόροι έδωσαν αυτοδυναμία σε ένα από τα κόμματα του παλαιοκομματικού κατεστημένου, το οποίο ευθύνεται σε μεγάλο βαθ…

Πρόγραμμα ΝΔ: το απόλυτο τίποτα της νεοφιλελεύθερης καταστροφής

του system failure
Είναι πολύ εύκολο να καταλάβει κανείς το σχέδιο Μητσοτάκη για την επόμενη μέρα, με βάση αυτό που διαφημίζει ως "πρόγραμμα". Η χειρότερη δεξιά της μεταπολίτευσης, φανατικά προσηλωμένη στον καταστροφικό νεοφιλελευθερισμό, έχει ως βασικό και απ'ότι φαίνεται μοναδικό στόχο, τις επενδύσεις και την ανάπτυξη. Δηλαδή, με λίγα λόγια, ο Κυριάκος θα πατήσει ένα κουμπί και όλα τα άλλα θα τα κάνουν οι περίφημες αγορές. Θα'ρθουν επενδυτές, θα δημιουργήσουν θέσεις εργασίας, θα επιστρέψουν οι νέοι από το εξωτερικό και η νεκρή μεσαία τάξη θα αναστηθεί ως εκ θαύματος. 
Μια μεσαία τάξη που, κατά τη λογική των μιντιακώνγκεμπελίσκων και των δεξιών τρολ, καταστράφηκε επί ΣΥΡΙΖΑ. Λες και δεν υπήρχε χώρα πριν το 15. Λες και η γαλαζοπράσινη λαίλαπα δεν χρεοκόπησε τη χώρα, δεν πετσόκοψε μισθούς και συντάξεις, δεν ρήμαξε τα ασφαλιστικά ταμεία, δεν έσωσε τα τραπεζιτικά παράσιτα με δισεκατομμύρια στέλνοντας τον λογαριασμό στα συνήθη υποζύγια. 
Η αλήθεια είναι ότι…