Skip to main content

Who and what will AI serve? US and China give very different answers

Artificial Intelligence is a frighteningly powerful new tool — and weapon. Who and what will it serve? In the U.S., tech giants Facebook, Google, and Amazon and their corporate agendas; in China, the needs of the public and the economy. These two models should be thought through now.

by Jim Carey

Part 2 - Silicon Valley: A hotspot of AI development and unethical business

Elon Musk may worry about the future of AI but this is not a feeling shared by many of his colleagues in Silicon Valley. When it comes to discussing the AI research sector in the U.S., it is useful to focus on the most well-known of Musk’s fellow tech behemoths who are leading the way. There are three companies that deserve the most scrutiny: Facebook, Google, and Amazon — which, working with agencies like the CIA and NSA as well as in partnership with other private companies, now dominate the AI game.

Although these giant companies score very low in public trust, they’ve nonetheless been placed in charge of the nation’s AI, essentially by default. When it comes to trusting names like Facebook, Google, and Amazon with this kind of technology, if their current business models are any indicator, we should all be wary.

Let’s start with the example of Facebook; a company run by Mark Zuckerberg, a man who is so lacking in empathy that he has no problem doing things like running psychiatric tests on unaware customers or attempting to steal land from indigenous people.

Facebook has already launched several projects to develop AI, led by their Facebook AI Research (FAIR) program. Included in this group’s research are projects such as the collection and analysis of Facebook users’ personal photos to better understand “the popular visual concepts illustrating various cultural lifestyles.

While FAIR’s smaller projects don’t always make the news, they do on those occasions when they begin producing results that show the research has surpassed programmers’ expectations. Such was the case in July of last year when Facebook’s AI began speaking a language the humans couldn’t understand, causing that particular program to be shuttered.

Facebook also applies AI to its user data in other ways, such as the system revealed late last year that will track users’ online activity and behavior to evaluate their mental health. While that may sound altruistic to some, having Facebook leading the charge should cause some concern.

After all, Facebook is the company that admittedly ran a (borderline illegal) experiment to manipulate the mood of its users by filtering the content they saw. This gross breach of trust with its users was later justified by Facebook, whose lawyers said the experiment was all within the guidelines of the user agreement, which comes in at over 15,000 words and readers may remember as that book-length document (with links to several more specific agreements) that tech companies are fully aware nobody possibly has the time to read.

It is also important to remember that Facebook serves as a giant marketing platform that derives its value from its ability to provide advertisers with users’ personal information. While it’s known that the platform is filled with easily-purchased and highly-targeted advertisements, there is also suspicion on behalf of users that Facebook could use phone and computer microphones to listen in on conversations for further ad-targeting.

While Facebook denies these claims, the other two companies on our list are a lot more open about their spying, while also engaging in business practices similar to those of Facebook.

Facebook’s AI competitor, Google, is also advancing its programs, including one that perfectly mimics human speech. Innovations like these are the reason many experts think that Google is at the head of the pack on developing its AI.

Much like Facebook, however, Google also is guilty of collecting massive amounts of data on its users. Also, like Facebook, some of the means Google uses in this data collection rely on AI — such as the Google ‘voice search’ feature, which has been shown to record conversations even when not in use.

Google also recently launched its photography software, which they claimed would “instantly recognize faces of special interest to its owner and, when it spots those faces, takes candid pictures of them.” Many people were uncomfortable when Google first unveiled this new technology — including Elon Musk, who criticized the software on Twitter, saying it “doesn’t even *seem* innocent.

If all of this isn’t bad enough, now Google is also creating devices that utilize AI to do even more blatant and comprehensive data-gathering. In this new arsenal is the popular Google Home, an AI assistant that responds to voice commands, which has been shown to listen in on users even when not in use.

This unwanted feature of Google Home is also built into products from the last company on our list of AI giants: Amazon. Much like Google Home, Amazon Echo and it’s AI program ‘Alexa’ also listen in on users.

Also following Google’s strategy, this data is then combined with data taken from other methods, such as monitoring search histories or product purchases, and added to massive databases kept by these private tech firms. This stored data is later fed back into Amazon’s AI, which then uses the data to drive Amazon’s “algorithms for demand forecasting, product search ranking, product and deals recommendations, merchandising placements, fraud detection, translations, and much more,” according to CEO Jeff Bezos in a letter to shareholders.

If the massive storage of data and unwitting exposure to things like experiments “educating” these advanced computer learning systems for private companies isn’t enough, things get even murkier when you examine the relation between these three tech giants and the U.S. government.

Source, links:


[1] [3] [4]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How neoliberalism manufactured consent to secure its unlimited power

From David Harvey's A Brief History of Neoliberalism
Part 3 - The corporate-backed institutions behind the rapid and artificial ideological transformation of the American society in favor of neoliberalism
In the US case I begin with a confidential memo sent by Lewis Powell to the US Chamber of Commerce in August 1971. Powell, about to be elevated to the Supreme Court by Richard Nixon, argued that criticism of and opposition to the US free enterprise system had gone too far and that ‘the time had come –– indeed it is long overdue –– for the wisdom, ingenuity and resources of American business to be marshalled against those who would destroy it’. Powell argued that individual action was insufficient. ‘Strength’, he wrote, ‘lies in organization, in careful long-range planning and implementation, in consistency of action over an indefinite period of years, in the scale of financing available only through joint effort, and in the political power available only through united action and n…

Mystery solved: here's why the Western mainstream media suddenly 'discovered' the war in Yemen

globinfo freexchange
Why it took so long for the Western mainstream media to 'discover' the war in Yemen and the war crimes committed by the Saudi coalition in full co-operation with the US?
One might think that the humanitarian disaster there - caused also by the blockade of goods for the relief of the civilians - has become so obvious, condemned multiple times by the UN, that the media finally forced to speak about it.
In previous article we attempted to explain the 'unexplained phenomenon' and the fact that CNN surprisingly returned to the issue to openly condemn the US support to the Saudi coalition atrocities against civilians in Yemen.
Yet, despite that the Saudi regimes have been, traditionally, the best allies of the Western neocolonialists, this time, the US had serious reasons to overthrow the Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS). And, surprisingly enough, at the center of this underground conflict lies an attempt by the US to privatize Aramco, Saudi Arab…

CIA had an agent at a newspaper in every world capital at least since 1977

Joel Whitney is a co-founder of the magazine Guernica, a magazine of global arts and politics, and has written for many publications, including the New York Times and Wall Street Journal. His book Finks: How the C.I.A. Tricked the World's Best Writers describes how the CIA contributed funds to numerous respected magazines during the Cold War, including the Paris Review, to subtly promote anti-communist views. In their conversation, Whitney tells Robert Scheer about the ties the CIA’s Congress for Cultural Freedom had with literary magazines. He talks about the CIA's attempt during the Cold War to have at least one agent in every major news organization in order to get stories killed if they were too critical or get them to run if they were favorable to the agency. And they discuss the overstatement of the immediate risks and dangers of communist regimes during the Cold War, which, initially, led many people to support the Vietnam War.
globinfo freexchange
James Jesus Angleton wa…

How the corporate elite started to eliminate the Left and the power of the US working class right after the end of WWII

globinfo freexchange
Richard Wolff brilliantly explains the economics behind the great US anti-leftist purge (McCarthyism) after 1945:
At the end of WWII - late 1940s into the 50s - something remarkable happened politically in the United States. And it was in many ways surprising. Suddenly, a group of people in the United States who had been celebrated as heroes, became instead - almost overnight – demons. From being leaders they became traitors.
Communists - members of the American Communist Party, Socialists - members of the two socialist parties at that time, and active leaders of the labor movement - the big organizing drives of the CIO in the 1930s and 40s, had brought millions of Americans who had never been in unions before, into the unions. They joined the unions because they thought it would be a safe way to make it through the Great Depression of the 1930s. At least safer than not being in a union.
And together, the Communists, the Socialists and the Unionists, really struggled …

Trump proves he is completely clueless on what's the real reason behind the mass layoffs epidemic in big businesses and how to deal with it

globinfo freexchange
Donald Trump's response to recent General Motors' decision to close plants and slash jobs, proves that he is completely clueless on what's the real reason behind the mass layoffs epidemic in US big businesses and how to deal with it.
The media circulated what Trump thinks to do about it, including threats against GM to impose auto tariffs, or, his most beloved action: penalties on foreign cars.
Yet, perhaps the most hilarious part in the whole story, is that one of the key frontline tools of the global neoliberal capital immediately published an 'in your face' article to make Trump realize that he is completely powerless too, against the forces of the markets. Here are some interesting parts:
... market forces are tough to beat, even if you’re president. Trump captured the White House thanks in large part to the story he told -- that he could reverse America’s industrial decline. He promised to bring back manufacturing and fossil-fuel j…

In 1961, US experts knew that the Soviets had only four ICBMs

globinfo freexchange
In a discussion with Paul Jay of the Real News, Daniel Ellsberg revealed that the US discovered - through a top-secret operation -that the USSR had only four(!) ICBMs back in 1961. This meant that the Soviets were very far from becoming a serious threat for the West. However, the false picture of the 'Soviet threat' remained powerful in order to permit the US to justify its frenzy nuclear armament race.
Ellsberg explains:
The estimate of 40 to 60 [Soviet intercontinental ballistic missiles] - which was pretty much in 1962 at the time of the missile crisis based on a lot of satellite photography - was much lower than was estimated earlier, from ‘58, ‘59, ‘60.
The Air Force had a higher estimate. Even the CIA official estimate in 1961 was well over 100. The State Department estimated like 160. The Air Force was much higher than that. And in August of 1961, the then commander of Strategic Air Command, Thomas Power, believed that there were then 1000 Soviet ICBMs…

False flag operations set up by private companies

globinfo freexchange
Here is another sector soon to be occupied entirely by private companies: staging successful false flag operations and the subsequent suitable psyops.
As the World Socialist Web Site reported early this year:
Cambridge Analytica’s parent company is British-based SCL. Formerly Strategic Communication Laboratories, it is a private behavioural research and strategic communication company, founded in 1993 by Nigel Oakes.
As with Oakes, SCL’s board members include scions of the British ruling class, from former military officers and defence contractors to major Conservative Party donors.
SCL boasts of providing “data, analytics and strategy to governments and military organizations worldwide,” notably the British Ministry of Defence, the US State Department and NATO. It states that it has carried out “behavioural change programs” in more than 60 countries. One of its first contracts in 1999 was promoting Indonesian President Abdurrahma…

Exploiting Khashoggi's assassination: the neoliberal predators hang over Saudi Arabia

globinfo freexchange
A month ago we gathered some information to explain the sudden 180 degrees hostile turn by the Western neoliberal status quo against the current Saudi regime.
We discovered that the US corporate dictatorship and the Wall Street mafia heavily invested on the rapid neoliberalization of the Saudi Arabian economy, with the privatization of the state-owned oil company Aramco at the heart of this plan. Suddenly, Mohammed bin Salman decided to step back from the deal.
It would be worth to note that Aramco was standing at the top of the global list of the largest oil and gas companies for 2017 with a revenue of 465.49 billion US dollars.
It seems that the neoliberal regime didn't abort its plans concerning Saudi Arabia and silently seeks to "replace" bin Salman with a more faithful puppet, exploiting, of course, the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi.
Digging a little bit more, we found plenty of evidence in the Western mainstream media, in recent years, showing …

How neoliberalism manufactured consent to secure its unlimited power

From David Harvey's A Brief History of Neoliberalism
Part 4 - Neoliberalism's second big experiment after Chile: the financial coup by the banking mafia to take over New York
One line of response to the double crisis of capital accumulation and class power arose in the trenches of the urban struggles of the 1970s. The New York City fiscal crisis was an iconic case. Capitalist restructuring and deindustrialization had for several years been eroding the economic base of the city, and rapid suburbanization had left much of the central city impoverished. The result was explosive social unrest on the part of marginalized populations during the 1960s, defining what came to be known as ‘the urban crisis’ (similar problems emerged in many US cities).
The expansion of public employment and public provision –– facilitated in part by generous federal funding –– was seen as the solution. But, faced with fiscal difficulties, President Nixon simply declared the urban crisis over in the early 1…

The Guardian in the frontline of the establishment media that have declared a dirty and ruthless war against Julian Assange, WikiLeaks and real journalism

globinfo freexchange
The Guardian has stepped up its contemptible role as one of the main media conduits for the persecution of Julian Assange, publishing unsubstantiated and sensationalist allegations that the WikiLeaks publisher met with American political lobbyist, Paul Manafort.
One of the two authors of the Guardian article was, predictably, Luke Harding. Harding has penned a stream of material aimed at undermining support for Assange and WikiLeaks and attempting to justify the efforts of the US government to prosecute him for espionage or conspiracy. Assange aptly described an error-filled 2014 book written by Harding about whistleblower Edward Snowden and WikiLeaks as a “hack job in the purest sense of the word.
The allegation that Assange met with Manafort is another desperate effort to implicate WikiLeaks in the lurid claims of the Democratic Party, US intelligence agencies and much of the media that the Russian government “interfered” in the 2016 US presidential election to pr…