Skip to main content

New Deal vs Obamacare: one reality and one desperate try

by system failure

In the 20s America, there was an unprecedented upsurge consumerism and a tendency for easy money. Something similar happened in the West in general, especially since the early 90s onwards. The great crash of 29 and the misery brought to millions of people, was essentially a big victory of the big bankers and speculators who made huge profits on the "corpse" of middle class, and so the Roosevelt administration was forced to turn to the Keynesian economic model where the economy could be restarted through the state as a basic investor.

The predecessor of president Roosevelt and US president during the great financial crisis of 29, Herbert Hoover, from the Republican party, did not believe in the welfare state, but in austerity and fiscal discipline. It is a perception that currently imposed by Merkel government in the eurozone, in contrast to the American government which, traditionally, focus on growth and job creation especially during the presidency of Democratic presidents. But the complete predominance of neoliberalism, rapidly changes policies implemented today in the Western world.

The decline of deregulation and the "New Deal"

Roosevelt implemented an aggressive policy of state investments in order to restart the economy and fight unemployment which had reached at nightmarish levels after the Great Crash of 29. Moreover, new infrastructures created, to benefit in many ways the American society. One example is the state company Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), created in May 1933, to construct , among other things, flood control projects and dams producing electricity and boost the economic development of the Tennessee Valley, a region which was particularly affected by the economic crisis. Private companies were particularly dissatisfied, as were excluded from the program and lost the chance for big profits.

Roosevelt faced negative criticism from across the political spectrum. The American economic elite criticized him because it didn't want to pay extra taxes for the "New Deal" implementation. Even the U.S. Supreme Court moved against him, considering that many legislative settings of the "New Deal" were unconstitutional. Propaganda had been unleashed by the economic elite, in an attempt to baptize the policies of "New Deal" as Socialist or even Communist, something which happens today in America, but in Greece as well.

A quote from a Roosevelt's speech is characteristic: “A few timid people, who fear progress, will try to give you new and strange names for what we are doing. Sometimes they will call it "Fascism," sometimes "Communism," sometimes "Regimentation," sometimes "Socialism." But, in so doing, they are trying to make very complex and theoretical something that is really very simple and very practical.”

Despite its imperfections, Roosevelt's "New Deal" created millions of new jobs and new infrastructure for the benefit of all American citizens, boosted some sectors such as agriculture, strengthened social security and boosted the economy in general. The response of Roosevelt, "of course we spend money", to his opponents, captures the perception of his government, giving importance to the prosperity and relief of people and not to the strict austerity for the sake of economic indexes. Indeed, while in 1933 the national debt was 20% of GDP, by 1936 this figure almost doubled, but what mattered for Roosevelt was to relieve American citizens and give them hope and perspective.

What happened until the Obama administration

While Roosevelt, despite the strong criticism he received, was able to impose a series of reforms that literally transformed the American state and gave to it a prominent role in the recovery of the economy, against the interests of big capital and for the benefit of the American people, Obama now faces a hard war for the "Obamacare", only one reform trying with great effort to pass, which focus exclusively on health and social security.

Today things are very difficult for Obama and for anyone who wants to pass laws that would enhance the welfare state and would benefit the vast majority because of the complete domination of the neoliberal doctrine, favoring a financial oligarchy, on top of which, the biggest private banks stand.

The first big victory of the big bankers recorded in December 1913, when under Woodrow Wilson administration, the control of dollar finally passed to the big private banks through the Federal Reserve Act. For the record, the final signature by the president Wilson came just two days before the Christmas holiday of 1913, if this means something. Thus, the US central bank continued to be "Federal" only by name, since the complete control of the quantity and flow of money, finally passed into the hands of the big bankers.

Although the Great Depression was a field test of the new conditions, the gold standard which was active at that time, had prevented "Federal" Reserve to print money at will, uploading with more debt the government. The bankers could not fully control government through debt and so Roosevelt, along with his strong personality, managed to pass the laws he wanted, despite the war against him.

After WWII, there has been an attempt for market regulation through the Bretton Woods Conference, but in 1971, Nixon ended the direct convertibility of the US dollar to gold, opening the door for the total dominance of neoliberalism and the big banks.

Little later, Milton Friedman and the Chicago Boys conducted the first major neoliberal experiment, using Chile of dictator Pinochet as a lab rat. Reagan and Thatcher who were fanatically committed to the neoliberal doctrine, extended its dominance during 80s, by applying the respective policies favoring deregulation and dismantling of the welfare state. In 1992, the former banker and CEO of Citigroup, Walter Wriston, finally announces the total dominance of neoliberalism in his book "The twilight of Sovereignty", while the same year, the chairman of the "Federal" Reserve, Alan Greenspan, "warns" the newly elected president Bill Clinton, to withdraw his campaign commitments for social benefits, as he claimed that, the deficit was reached dangerous levels.

Subsequently, we have twenty years of financial bubbles and failed policies, with the IMF intervening in many areas of the planet. The only winners were the big banks and speculators, while the economies of many countries were destroyed.

Obama: probably wants, definitely can't

If one take a look at the data, can see that the share of the US government debt held by the "Federal" Reserve reached record levels in 2011, reaching 11.2% of GDP, the highest since 1940 onwards, and possibly the historically higher. In 2012, this rate was also high at 10.6% of GDP. Only once this figure reached such levels, in 1946, i.e. shortly after the end of WWII, when it reached 10.7% of GDP. [Table 7.1, http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/historicals]

The spiraling debt of the Federal Government to "Federal" Reserve, is due to repeated quantitative easing policies, i.e. primarily "printing" new money, supposedly made to stimulate the economy. Instead, however, the money went solely to bailout biggest banks, some of which participate in the "Federal" Reserve! Which means that, money returned to the banks through a circle, while uploaded US government with more debt, which will be passed on to future generations! Unanswered questions remain also, about the case on the basis of which, the "Federal" Reserve secretly supplied through the "back door" with more than $ 9 trillion, various financial institutions with questionable balance sheets during the financial crisis in the US. Nobody seems to deal with this issue today. [http://www.counterpunch.org/2010/12/20/the-tax-payers-tab-a-cool-9-trillion-and-then-some/]

The wealthiest only see numbers and not people. The growing population means for them "more taxes", while the government shutdown means "less taxes". While Roosevelt did so many steps to reform the state and to relieve the American people, Obama cannot pass neither one legislation for the health and social security. The visit received from leading bankers shortly after the announcement of the US government shutdown is characteristic. Bankers don't pretend anymore because they want to show clearly who is the "big boss".

And this is not far from truth since, the introduction of dollar as the global reserve currency and the rapid rise of computer technology, made the US "Federal" Reserve completely dominant. So, if China for example, would theoretically require to be paid in dollars for the entire US debt which holds, in just one day, this could be done practically with the push of a button on the computer. China's share of US debt would pass automatically to the hands of the "Federal" Reserve. One easily understands that any American government is fully controlled by the "banksters".

Bankers, who lie at the top of the economic elites, want to secure the ultimate goal of the neoliberal doctrine, which is the dissolution of the nation-state. This would extricate economic elites from state supervision and taxes for the welfare state, which is in favor of the economically weaker, and would finalize their dominance through the growing concentration of wealth in a global environment of full deregulation. So, they do not want in any way to open a new cycle of a Roosevelt type state intervention because this could hinder their ultimate goal.

So, the bankers in particular, do not want to risk the appearance of a "mad" politician of the Andrew Jackson type, who could nationalize central bank and zero national debt because that would mean the end of their absolute sovereignty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's definite: Elizabeth Warren is the female Obama, can't be trusted

globinfo freexchange

One year from the 2020 US presidential election, things start to become clearer day by day. In the US political scene, we can now recognize the authentic progressives from the fakes, and certainly, from the establishment neoliberal centrists. 
In the presidential-candidates level we can now identify only Bernie Sanders and Tulsi Gabbard as the ones who are willing to fight the establishment and try to implement progressive, anti-imperialist policies. After her latest position, concerning the military coup in Bolivia against the democratically elected Evo Morales, Elizabeth Warren could be considered a pseudo-progressive, equal to a female Barack Obama. Therefore, progressives definitely can't trust her.
Warren tweeted:
The Bolivian people deserve free and fair elections, as soon as possible. Bolivia's interim leadership must limit itself to preparing for an early, legitimate election. Bolivia's security forces must protect demonstrators, not commit …

Latest WikiLeaks revelation and its treatment by the mainstream press explicitly demonstrate why the imperialists are determined to eliminate Julian Assange

globinfo freexchange
On November, 23, WikiLeaks published an e-mail, sent by a member of an OPCW fact-finding mission to Syria to his superiors, in which he expresses his gravest concern over intentional bias introduced to a redacted version of the report he co-authored.
The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons sent a team of experts to investigate allegations that a chemical attack took place in the Syrian city of Douma on the 7th of April 2018. The author of the e-mail was a member of that team and claims the redacted preliminary version of the report, misrepresents the facts he and his colleagues discovered on the ground. The e-mail is dated 22nd of June. It is addressed to Robert Fairweather, Chief of Cabinet, and forwarded to his deputy Aamir Shouket and members of the fact-finding mission to Douma.  


In short, the OPCW whistleblower actually claims that the report has been somehow altered. And it was done in a way to fit the scenario, according to which, the Assa…

LIVE: Bolivians resist military coup in La Paz

Οργανισμός Αμερικανικών Κρατών: Στην υπηρεσία της Ουάσινγκτον

του Ανδρέα Κοσιάρη
Ο Οργανισμός Αμερικανικών Κρατών, που εξέδωσε την έκθεση για την εκλογική αναμέτρηση στη Βολιβία, η οποία «δικαιολόγησε» το πραξικόπημα εναντίον του Έβο Μοράλες, είναι στη θεωρία ένας ουδέτερος οργανισμός κρατών. Στην πραγματικότητα όμως έχει μακρά ιστορία υποστήριξης των επεμβάσεων των ΗΠΑ στη Λατινική Αμερική, και σήμερα χρηματοδοτείται κατά πλειοψηφία από τα ταμεία του αμερικανικού κράτους. 
Παρά την ίδρυσή του το 1948 με σκοπό την «προώθηση της ειρήνης και τη διευθέτηση διαφωνιών μεταξύ των κρατών-μελών», ήταν μάλλον από την αρχή όργανο της αντικομμουνιστικής εξωτερικής πολιτικής των ΗΠΑ.

Ο ΟΑΚ υπήρξε σιωπηλός ή και στήριξε όλες ανεξαιρέτως τις αμερικανικές επεμβάσεις στη Λατινική Αμερική, είτε αυτές λάμβαναν τη μορφή εισβολής, όπως στην Κούβα το 1961, είτε τη μορφή στήριξης σε πραξικοπήματα και δικτατορικά καθεστώτα, όπως στη Χιλή το 1973 (και στην Αργεντινή, τη Βολιβία, τη Γουατεμάλα, τη Νικαράγουα, την Αϊτή, τον Παναμά, τη Βραζιλία, την Παραγουάη και τον Ισημ…

WikiLeaks evidence that the imperialist machine was monitoring anti-imperialist Jeremy Corbyn at least since the US invasion of Iraq

The WIKILEAKS Public Library of US Diplomacy (PlusD)holds the world's largest searchable collection of United States confidential, or formerly confidential, diplomatic communications. As of April 8, 2013 it holds 2 million records comprising approximately 1 billion words. The collection covers US involvements in, and diplomatic or intelligence reporting on, every country on earth. It is the single most significant body of geopolitical material ever published. The PlusD collection, built and curated by WikiLeaks, is updated from a variety of sources, including leaks, documents released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and documents released by the US State Department systematic declassification review. 
globinfo freexchange
A cable from December, 2002, proves that the US officials were closely monitoring anti-war activities. The particular cable was describing a protest "against a possible U.S.-led operation against Iraq" in Istanbul, Turkey, and there is a spec…

Technocracy now: The US is working to turn Lebanon’s anti-corruption protests against Hezbollah

While Lebanon’s protests remain focused on the economy and widespread corruption, Washington is increasingly determined to exploit the movement as a geopolitical weapon in the region.
by Rania Khalek
Part 1
Lebanon erupted in massive protests this October. The demonstrations transcended sect and class, and quickly spread across the country. The movement was spurred by the levying of regressive taxes and the persistence of a corrupt neoliberal order that has mismanaged the economy and hollowed out the public sector while enriching a handful of elites amid a looming economic collapse. 
Though the protests remain focused on class issues and corruption, the US is increasingly determined to co-opt the movement for its own goals. At the forefront of Washington’s agenda is ousting Hezbollah from the Lebanese governing coalition and marginalizing the Shia political-military movement as a means of weakening Iran. In its place, the US and its proxies inside Lebanon are demanding a “technocratic” g…

Nos oponemos al golpe

Declaración de Noam Chomsky y Vijay Prashad
En Bolivia se está gestando un golpe de Estado contra el gobierno electo liderado por Evo Morales. Sectores de la policía han dicho abiertamente que están dispuestos a permitir que grupos de milicias fascistas ataquen el palacio presidencial en La Paz. La situación es muy grave.

Evo Morales ha invitado a los cuatro principales partidos a sentarse y conversar sobre el camino a seguir para la democracia boliviana. Ha pedido el establecimiento de un diálogo para evitar el regreso de los días de las dictaduras militares y los gobiernos oligárquicos. Morales ha hecho un llamado a las Naciones Unidas, a la Organización de los Estados Americanos (OEA), al Vaticano y a otros más para que contribuyan a encontrar el camino para alejarse del golpe.

El golpe es promovido por la oligarquía boliviana que está enojada por la cuarta elección que sus partidos pierden frente el Movimiento al Socialismo. La oligarquía cuenta con el total apoyo del gobierno de los…

Here's why Bernie could end up being better than even FDR

globinfo freexchange

In his speeches, Bernie Sanders frequently refers to the 32nd president of the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), and his New Deal program that helped millions of Americans after the 1929 Wall Street crash. Sanders and other progressives are proposing a similar program adjusted to the modern environmental challenges. The Green New Deal has now become a popular vision, especially among young Americans. Around it, the progressives are aiming to build a whole new model beyond destructive neoliberalism and even obsolete capitalism.

Many would argue that this is quite an extremely optimistic view. That Sanders is just an old-school moderate Social-Democrat who will only manage to revive some typical social policies of the past, and that's it. He will never manage to seriously challenge the current power structure, which, indeed, has grown enormously, controlling nearly every aspect of the political and economic life.

Yet Sanders already managed to achieve …

It's now or never: the first step for a Sanders/Corbyn synchronization in power must be done on 12 December in UK

This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for the global working class
by system failure
Two years ago, we wondered whether a US government under Bernie Sanders, together with a UK government under Jeremy Corbyn, could mark a decisive victory against neoliberalism. Whether it could mark the beginning of the end of the Reagan/Thatcher awful legacy.

It seems that the time has come for the first step towards this prospect.

The oncoming UK general election on Thursday 12 December 2019, will be the most critical for decades, especially for the global working class. The outcome will determine to a significant degree, whether the capitalist West will change course away from the destructive neoliberalism, towards a form of Democratic Socialism. A new model that will resurrect the social state, while at the same time, will seriously deal with the great environmental challenges, defying big interests and rejecting the for-profit-wars model.



As we already pointed out, the whole Brexit issue is pri…

How a mass bot network is pushing the coup in Bolivia

New research found that, of the 17,427 accounts studied using anti-Morales hashtag #BoliviaNoHayGolpe, almost a third were created on November 11, the day of the coup.
by Alan Macleod 
Bolivia. November 11. Generals appear on television demanding the immediate resignation of the elected head of state, Evo Morales. Ever since Morales won the October 20 election, the country had been in upheaval. The right-wing Bolivian opposition claimed that the socialist had won by foul means, an accusation repeated by the Organization of American States. All over Bolivia, the opposition attempted to intimidate or terrorize the government into submission. For example, the Mayor of Vinto, Patricia Arce, was kidnapped, tied up, had her hair shaved off, covered in paint and dragged through the streets as she was physically and verbally abused. It seemed like a classic Latin America-style coup in the U.S.’ backyard.

But on social media, it was a different story. Twitter was full of tweets in both English …