Skip to main content

The age of stagnating revolutions(?)

by system failure

Alain Badiou, the famous French philosopher, has told that "capitalism is the impose of a peculiar time, a time of a titular endless transformation, while in reality time is stagnating...".

This stagnating situation appears to be confirmed with a characteristic way through the movements of the latest years in the European south, East Mediterranean and the Arab World. What we see, is in essence, the result of societies trapped inside a one-dimensional cultural totalitarianism.

During the last three years, many riots of different intensities took place - and some of them are still active - in those countries, a combined area of more than 15 million square kilometres and total population of nearly 460 million people.

Despite the huge total size of these countries, someone would sense that almost nothing changes. Neither the importance of these riots seems to mobilize West, which is not particularly interested for the future of millions of people. The United States, specifically, are trying to get over with open fronts, probably due to the fact that some new big oil and natural gas fields have been found inside their territory. It appears that they only want to control Russian influence in Europe, by promoting oil and natural gas pipelines, controlled by Western companies. A recent example, is the deal of the TAP pipeline from Azerbaijan, to compete against South Stream, the Russian interests' pipeline.

In Egypt, for example, after the fall of the Mubarak regime, authoritarianism and police violence continued unabated. It seems that not too many things have changed in the everyday life of the Egyptians. The desperate effort of people to escape from the authoritarian state treatment, resulted to new riots and the fall of Morsi this time. But again, it seems that Egypt is facing a dead end, walking towards a disastrous civil war similar to that in Syria. Some people have given their lives, and no one knows how many others will be sacrificed, but for what purpose?

We know very few things for the situation now in Libya, which seems that is left in chaos. No one seems to be interested for the fortunes of people, but only for the oil and natural gas fields.

In Turkey, the intention of Erdogan to impose specific prohibitions, made people, especially young, to go out in the streets to protest. But, due to the different culture, Erdogan should normally had a different perception, compared to that of the Western leaders. However, he is another characteristic example of a leader who is unable to inspire a vision for the people and restricted from the one-dimensional economic perception of the neoliberal dictatorship. It is quite clear of how much hollow these prohibitions are, for the sake of Islamic culture because, on the other hand, Erdogan follows exactly the rules of the "new economy", which sacrifice everything for profit.

Traditional Islamic values, opposite to the passion for wealth and money lending at interest, totally incompatible with the Western lifestyle (promoted by the Turkish TV soap operas with the necessary particularities), have been lost a long time ago. However, Erdogan seems that he doesn't understand this reality and vainly tries to bring back the Islamic culture in Turkey. Besides, he didn't dare to challenge Turkish big media bosses instead of challenging people in the streets. He didn't dare to send the police to them.

The riots in Bulgaria is another characteristic case. People appear to be trapped between Right-wing governments and supposed Socialist governments, like the present one, which they adopt similar policies against the majority and for the benefit of the local economic oligarchy. Even the fear for the return of an old-type Communist regime, seems to be pointless.

In the European south, people are in trenches, defending and trying to save what they can. But in this case also, the "stagnating" situation is present and clear, confirmed by the fact that societies are unable to vision a totally different model of social organizing, at least for the present and in a massive level, and protest in the streets with economic-type requests which essentially belong to the totalitarianism of the neoliberal dictatorship. The pseudo-rationalism with which societies have been "poisoned" by this cultural totalitarianism, supposedly to prevent total destruction, in reality destroys human conquests of decades, and therefore, protests in the streets seem to be, at least, pointless too.

Someone could argue that these thoughts are rather simplified because the nature of riots is different in various countries, due to the different facts related mainly with the history and culture of each country. This might be true, but what about the commercials between live pictures of thousands of people in the Tahrir square in Egypt, for example? What do they mean? And, what about us, watching those people - and allow me to use another phrase of Badiou - like a spectacle? While at the same time, we, who taste all the consequences of the economic crisis, become a spectacle for others?

This cultural totalitarianism is like a powerful tool which aligns everything in the same direction. It cuts everything in a minimum size and impose itself. Thus, the question-mark in the headline of this text seems to be justified. Are we indeed living in the age of stagnating revolutions? Or, are these only riots that lead to nowhere? People who sacrifice their lives for nothing?

Comments

  1. For what is worth, although I'm far from being a living fossil, at my age (50+) I've seen many things.

    People will try to avoid reaching to extremes for as long as possible. They will put up to all sorts of abuses, just so as not to rock the boat.

    And then, one day, for something seemingly trivial, they explode. The question is what happens after that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, nice to see you back. Well, I think it happens already. Today, people died in Egypt. What is more extreme than this? Of course I understand your thought, because we don't have yet "uncontrolled" massive riots in many countries simultaneously.

      Well maybe this is the case. In such a populated planet, first time in history, we need to see massive riots in many countries to reach a critical mass which will make the difference.

      But I wonder as you, what happens after that because there is no alternative even in theoretical level in people's minds. This is the key issue here. This cultural totalitarianism spreads everywhere, erasing every other alternative. More and more people are thinking through its terms, especially new generations.

      We need an alternative, truly radical, in order to return back to the real evolution as humanity.

      Delete
  2. How many times and in how many places did peasants in Medieval times rise up against their lords? I don't think the present situation is new. Revolutions by definition, unless it's a leadership revolution (basically a coup, or what has been happening in Egypt), are likely to fail.

    Capitalism, like Feudalism, is strong enough to survive quite a number of revolutions. Things will change if the conditions and the culture of the population change. Like the rise of the cities and the new economic power of the bourgeois that lead to end of Feudalism.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It has started: Big corporations institutionalize land-grab to control the global food production

globinfo freexchange   As we were writing back in 2014:                        Having secured the new labor force through fully automated machines, what has left for the dominant elite now, is to take all the resources. Big corporations are grabbing huge cultivable areas especially in the developing countries in order to control food production.  We have come now to the point where big corporations literally institutionalize land-grab to control the global food production.   As The Grayzone recently revealed [emphasis added]:  In June 2019, the office of UN General Secretary António Guterres, without previous discussion in the General Assembly or any other intergovernmental process, signed a strategic partnership with the World Economic Forum. [...] The 2021 UN Food Systems Summit was initiated through a partnership with the World Economic Forum, with limited participation of other UN bodies, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization or the Committee on World Food Secu

Fifty years from Nixon's shock: The moment the gates of hell opened to release neoliberalism and financial capitalism

globinfo freexchange   Half century passed from Richard Nixon's economic reform. The "Nixon shock" included " the unilateral cancellation of the direct international convertibility of the United States dollar to gold. Although Nixon's actions did not formally abolish the existing Bretton Woods system of international financial exchange, the suspension of one of its key components effectively rendered the Bretton Woods system inoperative. While Nixon publicly stated his intention to resume direct convertibility of the dollar after reforms to the Bretton Woods system had been implemented, all attempts at reform proved unsuccessful. By 1973, the Bretton Woods system was replaced de facto by the current regime based on freely floating fiat currencies. "   And so, one of the worst presidents in the history of the United States opened the door to the domination of financial capitalism and the correlated destructive neoliberalism.    Two years after Nixon's s

Corruption in Britain - ‘City of London at Forefront of Tax Evasion & Money Laundering Industry’

Going Underground   Lord Prem Sikka discusses the neoliberal structural problems in the economy that neither the Labour or Conservative Party are willing to address, the privatisation by stealth of the National Health Service (NHS) and the subsequent decline of the NHS’ standard of healthcare provision, the government’s main priority being to provide tax cuts to corporations and the rich as the poor lose out, corporate and super-rich tax avoidance in Britain as the #PandoraPapers are leaked, the auditing industry and the government’s refusal to crack down on malpractice, the refusal of both Keir Starmer and Boris Johnson to address income inequality and call for redistribution, ties between elected MPs and the financial sector, and how London is at the forefront of tax evasion and money laundering. 

US drone killed 10 Afghans including aid worker & 7 kids after water jugs were mistaken as bombs

Democracy Now!   Reporter Matthieu Aikins on how his investigation for The New York Times found an August 29 U.S. drone strike, which the Pentagon claimed targeted a facilitator with the militant group ISIS-K, actually killed 10 Afghan civilians, including seven children and Zemari Ahmadi, an Afghan engineer who had worked since 2006 for an American aid group.  A review of video evidence by the Times shows Zemari loading canisters of water at the charity’s office, after the Pentagon claimed surveillance video showed Zemari loading what they thought were explosives into a car at an unknown compound earlier in the day. “ We put together evidence that showed that what the military interpreted as a series of suspicious moves from the sky was, according to his co-workers and colleagues and video evidence, just an ordinary day for this aid worker, ” says Aikins.

Το Μητσοτακικό καθεστώς ετοιμάζεται να χαρίσει 23 δισ. στα αρπακτικά ταμεία βουλιάζοντας βαθύτερα τη χώρα στη χρεοκοπία!

globinfo freexchange   Ούτε τώρα απαντήθηκε η ερώτηση του Γιάνη Βαρουφάκη προς τον υπουργό οικονομικών του Μητσοτακοκαθεστώτος, Χρήστο Σταϊκούρα. Η ερώτηση αφορούσε, για άλλη μια φορά, τον σκανδαλώδη και κατάπτυστο νόμο "Ηρακλής" του καθεστώτος Μητσοτάκη. Ο Βαρουφάκης ρώτησε αν η κυβέρνηση προτίθεται να εγγράψει στο δημόσιο χρέος τα δισεκατομμύρια με τα οποία θα αποζημιωθούν από το Ελληνικό δημόσιο τα αρπακτικά ταμεία για τα κόκκινα δάνεια.    Όπως αποκάλυψε ο Βαρουφάκης:                       Σήμερα, έχουμε πληροφορίες - το γνωρίζουμε πολύ καλά αυτό - ότι η Eurostat εξέτασε την επισφάλεια των δανείων του πακέτου του "Ηρακλή" και απαιτεί να γραφτούν τα 12 συν 11, 23 δισεκατομμύρια στο δημόσιο χρέος. Δεν ξέρω αν θα γίνει. Ξέρω ότι υπάρχει μεγάλη πίεση και ξέρω ότι έχετε χάσει τον ύπνο σας κύριε Σταϊκούρα γι'αυτό. [...] Αν προσθέσετε σ'αυτό, τον δανεισμό που έχετε προγραμματίσει, των 15 δισεκατομμυρίων για του χρόνου, μιλάμε για συνολική αύξηση του δημόσιου χ

Kidnapping, assassination and a London shoot-out: Inside the CIA's secret war plans against WikiLeaks

Zach Dorfman, Sean D. Naylor and Michael Isikoff   Part 1 - Some in the White House worried that the campaign against WikiLeaks would end up “weakening America”   In 2017, as Julian Assange began his fifth year holed up in Ecuador’s embassy in London, the CIA plotted to kidnap the WikiLeaks founder, spurring heated debate among Trump administration officials over the legality and practicality of such an operation. Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.” The conversations were part of an unprecedented CIA campaign directed against WikiLeaks and its founder. The agency’s multipronged plans also included extensive spying on WikiLeaks associates, sowing discord a

Iran at UN: ISIS would be Europe's neighbor if not for Iran, Syria, Iraq

Moderate Rebels   At the United Nations, Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi called US intervention " the biggest hindrance " to peace and stability, denouncing murderous American sanctions and the new cold war.  https://benjaminnorton.substack.com/p/iran-at-un-isis-would-be-europes  

Kidnapping, assassination and a London shoot-out: Inside the CIA's secret war plans against WikiLeaks

Zach Dorfman, Sean D. Naylor and Michael Isikoff   Part 3 - The immediate question facing Pompeo and the CIA was how to hit back against WikiLeaks and Assange   On April 13, 2017, wearing a U.S. flag pin on the left lapel of his dark gray suit, Pompeo strode to the podium at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank, to deliver to a standing-room-only crowd his first public remarks as Trump’s CIA director. Rather than use the platform to give an overview of global challenges or to lay out any bureaucratic changes he was planning to make at the agency, Pompeo devoted much of his speech to the threat posed by WikiLeaks. “ WikiLeaks walks like a hostile intelligence service and talks like a hostile intelligence service and has encouraged its followers to find jobs at the CIA in order to obtain intelligence, ” he said. “ It’s time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is: a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like

How US media misrepresent the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s laboratories and safety protocols

Even if we were to accept all the accusations against the WIV regarding their alleged subpar safety standards, none of it has any relevance to the Covid-19 pandemic unless it can be shown the WIV possessed SARS-CoV-2 in its lab before the outbreak, and there is no evidence of that.   by Joshua Cho    Part 2 - State Department cable a ‘nothing burger’   The claim that the WIV was conducting its experiments in substandard or unsafe working conditions started gaining mainstream acceptance when Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin published an op-ed based on redacted State Department cables from 2018. Rogin claimed that the redacted cables were evidence of “safety issues” at the WIV:                                    Two years before the novel coronavirus pandemic upended the world, U.S. Embassy officials visited a Chinese research facility in the city of Wuhan several times and sent two official warnings back to Washington about inadequate safety at the lab, which was conducting risky s

Water as weapon of war: Activists say Israel is drying out the West Bank to drive out Palestinians

What was billed as a cooperative venture between Palestine and Israel is merely the occupation of water in disguise   by Jessica Buxbaum    Part 2 - Soldiers aiding settlers in water attacks   Saturday’s protest was calm and without clashes, but the event was underscored by earlier violence. Tuesday of that week, at least 60 masked Israeli settlers raided Mfakara — throwing stones, turning over cars, cutting water pipes and slitting the throats of sheep. Five children were injured during the attack, including a four-year-old boy who was sent to the hospital after being pelted in the head with rocks. Israeli soldiers watched from the sidelines — during what activists are describing as a “pogrom”– intervening only to fire tear gas, stun grenades and rubber-coated steel bullets at Palestinians. Earlier in September, a CFP protest to deliver water to Palestinian communities was met with violence from Israeli soldiers. Six Israelis and two Palestinans were injured — including Rabee, who was