Skip to main content

Some methods of disorientation in Greek crisis

by system failure

Here are some methods and tactics of disorientation of public opinion from the systemic establishment during the Greek crisis. Of course, they can be called “conspiracy theories” from those who do not believe them.

Contrived disagreements

Contrived disagreements between government partners. Are used to give the impression that since there are disagreements between government partners, there is a factor inside the government coalition that can impose red lines and negotiations at least on some issues in order to maintain some benefits for the people, and also give the impression that there are no pre-decided facts. In this case, the role of the “bad guy” must be played by the ex-liberals and current neoliberals of the Greek Right-wing, against the more “sensitive” to people's rights “Socialists” and moderate Leftists of PASOK and Dimocratiki Aristera (Democratic Left) respectively.

Contrived disagreements between government officials and representatives of the troika. Are used to persuade the public that the government resists against some of the troika demands without saying “yes to all”. Since all the measures that the creditors want have already decided and agreed, the troika representatives will possibly quit from some of the additional measures that they demand, in order to help the Greek government to stabilize its position by giving the picture of a government which is negotiating and resisting at some level. The more the creditors will gain, the better for the full success of the Greek experiment. In this case, the role of the “bad guy” must be played by the representative of IMF Poul Thomsen, a role that the Greek media gave to him, in order to present him as the most relentless between the troika representatives, as if he is taking decisions alone without any guidance.

Contrived disagreements between the troika representatives. Are used to give the impression that the troika representatives often take decisions independently due to their knowledge and experience, and that they express freely their disagreements, and also, that there is no group of specific interests at least in a European level that promotes specific policies by guiding them. The disagreements have passed currently at a higher level between the European creditors and IMF, in order to justify the supposed different approaches of the creditors. However, at this higher level, it is the European creditors that appear more relentless, demanding more cuts in pensions and wages than the IMF. All these bad tactics and misalignment between the creditors and the Greek bank-occupied media of systemic propaganda, reveal for one more time, that the only goal they have is to promote specific neoliberal policies for the benefit of the big capital and banking interests. Besides, Christine Lagarde's recent statement about the need for more cuts in wages in Greece in the name of competition, as well as the troika's demand that the Greek government should not ask now the nearly 500 million euros from the Greek banks which they owe to the Greek state only from the first bailout package back in 2008 but proceed to further cuts in wages and pensions instead, reveals clearly the full alignment between the troika parts which are dedicated to their real goal.

Methods of disorientation

"Cleaning" operations of illegal immigrants from the government. Are used to disorientate the public from the new cruel measures. Through this tactic, the government aims to regain the part of the society which is most vulnerable to the repercussions of illegal immigration, by giving the impression that is determined to deal directly with the problem. In this case, the role of the mainstream media is also critical.

Disorientation of the public opinion through the mainstream media news and stilted discussion shows. The systemic journalists are using phrases-cliche like “the people cannot bear any more”, “the rich must pay” etc, giving the impression that are sympathize with the majority, while on the other hand, they announce continuous cuts in pensions and wages and refering to the inability of the state to proceed in the so called “structural reforms”, which refer exclusively to the shrinking of the public sector and the privatizations. In this case, they are usually using the phrase “small and flexible public sector” suggesting in reality more job cuts in the public sector avoiding to support this straightly. On the other hand, the pressure for privatizations is used as a blackmail, since the same journalists support that, if the privatizations had been made fast, the government could avoid the pressure of the troika for more cuts in pensions and wages. But they are hiding the fact that the fast-track privatizations in reality mean, for a start, basically three things: further job cuts in the name of the viability of any private corporation, further tax cuts for the big capital as an exchange for undertaking the “problematic” public sector businesses and services, and selling at extremely low prices - much below their real value - the public sector businesses to the big capital that supports government, among which can be found the owners of the largest private media for which the systemic journalists are working.

Additionally, the mainstream media “discover” every day various cases of deceit and corruption which refer exclusively to corrupted public sector employees, people that do not have the right to receive pension, or other similar cases, giving the impression that the problem comes exclusively from this type of corruption, in order to hide the big responsibilities of the banks. On the other hand, they are using a language of triumphalism when a new bank merging is about to happen, supporting that this is good for the economy. While in reality, the bank mergings create “Too Big to Fail” banks, stronger bank cartels that will demand more and more bailout packages at the expense of the taxpayers, putting the national economy at an increasingly worse position and loading the future generations with more debt.

The hypocrisy of the bankers is remarkable since they announce that they are willing to pay the 500 million that they owe only from the first bailout package, while on the other hand they are mobilizing their connections and influence inside the troika so that the troika now asks from the Greek government not to “disturb” banks by asking them to pay, but to proceed instead to further cuts as an easy alternative source for the equivalent amount.

Recent examples of disorientation operations

On 27 July of 2012 the big scandal of “selling” the healthy part of the public bank Agrotiki to the private bank Piraeus is finalized. Just three days before, on 24 July of 2012, Panagiotis Roumeliotis - ex-representative of Greece in IMF and currently vice chairman at Piraeus bank – in a statement to NY Times supports that: “We knew at the fund from the very beginning that this program was impossible to be implemented because we didn’t have any successful example...”. The statement was spread rapidly from the Greek media. With this “honest confession”, Roumeliotis says something that nearly everyone knows: that the IMF policies have been followed dogmatically since they have been unsuccessful everywhere they applied. The bankers are playing the card of IMF, knowing that nearly noone believes in its good intensions anyway, in an attempt to distract the pubic attention from the big scandal which is about to come three days later.

However, it seems that during the next days this tactic was about to fail, since a significant part of the opposition in the Greek parliament as well as several indepentent Greek blogs and websites were speaking clearly about a big scandal refering to the “selling” of Agrotiki bank to Piraeus bank, while they were revealing all the details of this action, something which the mainstream media rushed to hide through a simple announcement. Next, as more and more people were focusing on the real scandal, Roumeliotis was called to testify to the authorities in order for his statement to gain officialy the appropriate importance, in a new attempt to distract the public attention. The official state was fully co-ordinated with the banking establishment to distract the public attention, while normally, the state authorities should have call the architects of the real scandal to give explanations about the fact that the healthy part of a public bank was given to a private bank with the money of the taxpayers and the “garbage” remains were loaded to them.

Ghost lists of names involved with political corruption. The government is trying to appear as determined to fight against the political corruption and the big tax fraudsters which sent illegally their money abroad. Therefore, there is a possibility of contrived supposed leaks or real blackmails between politicians and people who involved with political corruption. But, as usual, noone knows nothing. Politicians are making public statements-cliche like “deep research must be done immediately” or “everything must be revealed” etc, in order to appear as they have nothing to hide. However, the unwillingness of the state to chase the tax fraudsters is quite obvious. The government is trying to find excuses, more than two years now, claiming that the lists of the tax fraudsters came through interception and therefore it has no legal right to check their deposits, or, that the authorities of Switzerland do not allow the checking of the bank deposits, or various other excuses. Therefore, this disorientation tactic fails dramatically.

All the above are just an example. Anyone can find much more to add.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Noam Chomsky, Chris Hedges & Vijay Prashad expose NATO

acTVism Munich    

Proof Twitter censored anyone CIA & FBI told them to!

The Jimmy Dore Show   When Viktor Shokin, a former Prosecutor General of Ukraine and notable target of onetime Vice President Joe Biden, wrote a book about his experiences in office, there were powerful individuals within the U.S. Government who didn’t want people reading this book, or even becoming aware it existed. And that’s why government agents insisted Twitter censor accounts promoting Shokin’s book, along with countless others in the tsunami of demands for censorship from government agencies that were flooding into the social media company prior to the 2020 election. Guest host Aaron Maté and journalist Matt Taibbi discuss the very dangerous precedent established by this unseemly private-public censorial partnership.

Can we save Julian Assange? Intellectuals & journalists speak out!

acTVism Munich   To close out the year, we summarize our work on the Julian Assange case by compiling excerpts of statements we recorded from Edward Snowden, Noam Chomsky, Stella Assange, Jeremy Corbyn, Glenn Greenwald, Paul Jay, Jill Stein, Nils Melzer, Chris Hedges, Tariq Ali, John Pilger, Jennifer Robinson, Srecko Horvat, and Angela Richter. We hope to continue our coverage of this case next year!  

Julian Assange and the rapid decline of liberal Democracy

by system failure We are now in 2023, and after 1362 days, Julian Assange is still in prison. If you seek something to measure the decline of liberal Democracy in our days, the Julian Assange case will help you a lot. And it's most amazing that in the era of information overflow (with plenty of means available to transfer it almost instantly in every corner of the planet), there are still many people who are unaware of the Assange case.   The origins of this deterioration go back in 1968 when the Left made a disastrous compromise with the powers of the establishment. Since the early 70s and after Nixon's shock , the cultural domination of neoliberalism paved the way for the restriction of certain types of liberties in Western societies.  The 9/11 terrorist attacks in 2001 became the perfect opportunity for the establishment to abolish instantly a significant portion of the civil liberties that came out of the 1968 compromise. The liberal Democracy in the West suffered a heavy

January 21, 2010: The day corporate dictatorship destroyed the last remnants of US Democracy

globinfo freexchange     As we described many times in this blog, corporate power grew rapidly since the early 70s with the rise of neoliberalism and its subsequent establishment as the dominant culture, especially in the West.  In the motherland of neoliberalism, the United States, corporations essentially legalized corruption in politics during the 70s in order to capture the entire political system and put it under their complete control. As David Harvey describes in his book A Brief History of Neoliberalism :                          The supposedly ‘progressive’ campaign finance laws of 1971 in effect legalized the financial corruption of politics. A crucial set of Supreme Court decisions began in 1976 when it was first established that the right of a corporation to make unlimited money contributions to political parties and political action committees was protected under the First Amendment guaranteeing the rights of individuals (in this instance corporations) to freedom of speec

Economists Radhika Desai & Michael Hudson explain multipolarity, decline of US hegemony

Geopolitical Economy Report   Introducing Geopolitical Economy Hour: This is the first episode of a show being hosted every two weeks by economists Radhika Desai and Michael Hudson. They present the program and discuss the rise of the multipolar world and decline of US hegemony.

New JFK/CIA revelations & our alarmingly secretive security state

Glenn Greenwald   Allen Dulles was probably the second or third most powerful person in Washington - maybe the most powerful in 1950s - when he ran the CIA until JFK fired him in 1961 because he blamed Dulles for the failed fiasco in the Bay of Pigs invasion in Cuba. And Dulles had every reason in the world to want to kill Kennedy, as did a lot of people in the CIA.  

Jeremy Corbyn on freeing Julian Assange, the working class, Brazil, Peru & ending Ukraine War

Democracy Now!   In Washington, D.C., human rights and free speech advocates gather today for the Belmarsh Tribunal, focused on the imprisonment of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Assange has been languishing for close to four years in the harsh Belmarsh prison in London while appealing extradition to the United States on espionage charges. If convicted, Assange could face up to 175 years in jail for publishing documents that exposed war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. Five major news organizations that once partnered with WikiLeaks recently called on the Biden administration to drop charges against Assange.    British MP and former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, who is in Washington, D.C., to participate in the Belmarsh Tribunal, speaks about Assange and freedom of the press. We also speaks about the state of leftism around the globe, from labor rights in the U.K. and Europe to the war in Ukraine, to political unrest in Brazil and Peru. 

Free Julian Assange: Noam Chomsky, Dan Ellsberg & Jeremy Corbyn lead call at Belmarsh Tribunal

Democracy Now!   Former British Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg, famed linguist and dissident Noam Chomsky and others gave testimony Friday at the Belmarsh Tribunal in Washington, D.C., calling on President Biden to drop charges against Julian Assange.    The WikiLeaks founder has been languishing for close to four years in the harsh Belmarsh prison in London while appealing extradition to the United States. If convicted in the United States, Julian Assange could face up to 175 years in jail for violating the U.S. Espionage Act for publishing documents that exposed U.S. war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. Friday's event was held at the National Press Club and co-chaired by Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman.   

Chief prosecutor puts Greece’s rule of law to the test

by Sarantis Michalopoulos   Part 1   Greek chief prosecutor Isidoros Ntogiakos caused shockwaves on Tuesday after he ruled that the independent authority responsible for privacy issues (ADAE) cannot conduct audits of telecommunication companies to find out who is under surveillance by Greek secret services. He even threatened the members of the Hellenic Authority for Communication Security and Privacy (ADAE) with criminal prosecution. The so-called “Greek Watergate” scandal, according to which several politicians, journalists and businessmen have been surveilled by Greek secret services by the conservative government of Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis (EPP), is considered an open wound for the country and the upcoming general elections.   Mitsotakis has tried to keep his distance so far, saying he was not aware of the wiretapping cases, although the first law he enacted as a prime minister was to take secret services under his remit. ADAE is an independent authority whose role is pr