Your browser does not support the HTML5 canvas tag.
Εγχειρίδιο χειρισμού κρίσεων λόγω πολιτικών ΔΝΤ από τη CIA! / Already confirmed: Civil liberties under attack! / Greece's creditors gone completely insane! / How the global financial mafia sucked Greece's blood / ECB's economic hitmen / Η Μέρκελ επιβεβαιώνει τα σχέδια των γραφειοφασιστών! /Greece: the low-noise collapse of an entire country/ How the neoliberal establishment tricked the masses again, this time in France / Ενώ η Γερμανία προετοιμάζεται για τα χειρότερα, η Ελλάδα επιμένει στο ευρώ! / Ένας παγκόσμιος "proxy" πόλεμος κατά της ελευθερίας έχει ξεκινήσει! / In reality, McCarthyism never ended in America / Ο επικεφαλής του "σκιώδους συμβουλίου" της ΕΚΤ επιβεβαιώνει ότι η ευρωζώνη είναι μια χρηματοπιστωτική δικτατορία! /With a rising Jeremy Corbyn and a declining Angela Merkel, Brexit has been upgraded to play a much more critical role / Δημοψήφισμα για Grexit: η τελευταία ευκαιρία να σωθεί η Ελλάδα και η τιμή της Αριστεράς / Populism as the new cliche of the elites to stigmatize anyone not aligned with the establishment / Δεν γίνεται έτσι "σύντροφοι" ... / Panama Papers: When mainstream information wears the anti-establishment mask / The Secret Bank Bailout / The head of the ECB “shadow council” confirms that eurozone is a financial dictatorship! / A documentary by Paul Mason about the financial coup in Greece / The ruthless neo-colonialists of 21st century / First cracks to the establishment by the American people / Clinton emails - The race of the Western neo-colonialist vultures over the Libyan corpse / Επιχείρηση Panama Papers: Το κατεστημένο θέλει το μονοπώλιο και στις διαρροές; / Operation "looting of Greece" reaches final stage / Varoufakis describes how Merkel sacrificed Greece to save the Franco-German banks / France officialy enters the neo-Feudal era! / The US establishment just gave its greatest performance so far ... / A significant revelation by WikiLeaks that the media almost ignored / It's official: the US is funding Middle-East jihadists! / Οι αδίστακτοι νεο-αποικιοκράτες του 21ου αιώνα / How to handle political unrest caused by IMF policies! / Πώς το νεοφιλελεύθερο κατεστημένο ξεγέλασε τις μάζες, αυτή τη φορά στη Γαλλία / Οι Γάλλοι νεοαποικιοκράτες επιστρέφουν στην Ελλάδα υπό 'ιδανικές' συνθήκες / Μεγαλώνει ο πανικός της Γουόλ Στριτ μπροστά στην προοπτική των κρυπτονομισμάτων

18 February, 2018

Regime change fails: is a military coup or invasion of Venezuela next?

by Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers

Part 3 - Is War Against Venezuela Coming?

A military coup faces challenges in Venezuela as the people, including the military, are well educated about US imperialism. Tillerson openly urging a military coup makes it more difficult.

The government and opposition recently negotiated a peace settlement entitled “Democratic Coexistence Agreement for Venezuela.” They agreed on all of the issues including ending economic sanctions, scheduling elections and more. They agreed on the date of the next presidential election. It was originally planned for March, but in a concession to the opposition, it was rescheduled for the end of April. Maduro signed the agreement even though the opposition did not attend the signing ceremony. They backed out after Colombian President Santos, who was meeting with Secretary Tillerson, called and told them not to sign. Maduro will now make the agreement a public issue by allowing the people of Venezuela to sign it.

Not recognizing elections and urging a military coup are bad enough, but more disconcerting is that Admiral Kurt Tidd, head of Southcom, held a closed door meeting in Colombia after Tillerson’s visit. The topic was “regional destabilization” and Venezuela was a focus.

A military attack on Venezuela from its Colombian and Brazilian borders is not far fetched. In January, the NY Times asked, “Should the US military invade Venezuela?” President Trump said the US is considering US military force against Venezuela. His chief of staff, John Kelly, was formerly the general in charge of Southcom. Tidd has claimed the crisis, created in large part by the economic war against Venezuela, requires military action for humanitarian reasons.

War preparations are already underway in Colombia, which plays the role of Israel for the US in Latin America. The coup government in Brazil, increased its military budget 36 percent, and participated in Operation: America United, the largest joint military exercise in Latin American history. It was one of four military exercises by the US with Brazil, Colombia and Peru in Latin America in 2017. The US Congress ordered the Pentagon to develop military contingencies for Venezuela in the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act.

While there is opposition to US military bases, James Patrick Jordan explains, on our radio show, the US has military bases in Colombia and the Caribbean and military agreements with countries in the region; and therefore, Venezuela is already surrounded.

The United States is targeting Venezuela because the Bolivarian Revolution provides an example against US imperialism. An invasion of Venezuela will become another war-quagmire that kills innocent Venezuelans, US soldiers and others over control of oil. People in the United States who support the self-determination of countries should show solidarity with Venezuelans, expose the US agenda and publicly denounce regime change. We need to educate people about what is really happening in Venezuela to overcome the false media coverage.

Share this article and the interview we did on Clearing The FOG about Venezuela and the US’ role in Latin America. The fate of Venezuela is critical for millions of Latin Americans struggling under the domination of US Empire.

***

Source, links:


[1] [2]

17 February, 2018

The US propaganda machine has just confirmed what establishment's worst nightmare would be: a great coalition of Bernie Sanders with the Greens


Another story of alleged 'Russian interference' in the 2016 US presidential election came on surface after Robert Mueller charged 13 Russian nationals and three Russian entities that assisted Kremlin's efforts to interfere in the election through an information warfare.

The report reveals the names of the alleged conspirators, but still, we should be very skeptical with any 'proof' about any case, coming from US agencies, as their capability to construct false evidence to promote certain agendas is recorded and well-known for decades.

But even if we accept these findings, the report actually clarifies three basic facts:

1st, that Russia did not actually 'hacked' the election, that is, did not altered the result through any kind of direct voting fraud, as previous 'Russiagate' stories were indirectly implied. These individuals were trying to reinforce support for certain candidates though information campaigns in social media and elsewhere. Well, the United States are doing much worse things in foreign countries when they want regime change. It's good that this has been clarified.

2nd, the report states that these campaigns were in favor of Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein, but there is absolutely no evidence that these individuals were connected with those candidates in any way.


3rd, after the election, the individuals were organizing both pro-Trump and anti-Trump events! For example, as described in a paragraph, “After the election of Donald Trump in or around November 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators used false U.S. personas to organize and coordinate U.S. political rallies in support of then president-elect Trump, while simultaneously using other false U.S. personas to organize and coordinate U.S. political rallies protesting the results of the 2016 U.S. presidential election. For example, in or around November 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators organized a rally in New York through one ORGANIZATION-controlled group designed to “show your support for President-Elect Donald Trump” held on or about November 12, 2016. At the same time, Defendants and their co-conspirators, through another ORGANIZATION-controlled group, organized a rally in New York called “Trump is NOT my President” held on or about November 12, 2016. Similarly, Defendants and their co-conspirators organized a rally entitled “Charlotte Against Trump” in Charlotte, North Carolina, held on or about November 19, 2016.

The above practice resembles Vladislav Surkov's method of 'non-linear' war that was expanded in the political and economical field and was tested inside Russia, but adopted also by Western politicians to manipulate the masses in their countries, as you can see in the following short video by Adam Curtis:


In essence, the concept of non-linear war has been adopted long before Surkov by the US war machine after WWII. The ultimate goal was not to win any war, but to fulfill specific targets. Similar methods of public control and manipulation were adopted by the metropolitan centers of modern propaganda and neoliberalism: the United States and the United Kingdom.

Yet, the most interesting outcome of the story is the reaction by many of the big media, part of the US propaganda machine. They rushed to create big headlines putting – in many cases - Trump, Sanders and Stein together, giving the impression (again) that they directly colluded with Russia.

This is a classic tactic that have been analyzed in the blog, on the occasion of 2016 US elections. The establishment attempts to smear real progressives by equalizing them with Trump through false accusations, while at the same time completely erases their huge ideological and political differences. The ultimate goal: to lead voters back to the neoliberal political center, expressed by mainstream politicians like Hillary Clinton, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, who have been portrayed as the key 'victims' of this case.

Of course, beyond the impressive headlines, the big media didn't bother to mention that Bernie Sanders endorsed Hillary Clinton, even after the dirty war against him by the DNC, and that he fully and openly aligned with the 'Russiagate' establishment narratives, through various statements.

Yet, we should thank the US propaganda machine because through its anxiety to grab another chance to smear both Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein, confirmed what establishment's worst nightmare would be: a great coalition of Bernie with the Greens.

Οι τρεις Σημιτοφύλακες

Απ' όσα έχουμε ακούσει, με αφορμή το σκάνδαλο Novartis, το... "η σκανδαλολογία ποινικοποιεί την πολιτική ζωή του τόπου", είναι η πιο διαχρονική και επικίνδυνη "καραμέλα" τον δύο Διόσκουρων του μεταπολιτευτικού πολιτικού μας συστήματος.

του Κωνσταντίνου Ταχτσίδη

Πλάι του στέκονται επάξια το σημιτικό: "όποιος έχει στοιχεία να τα πάει στον εισαγγελέα" και το "Δεν προκύπτει κανένα στοιχείο πιθανής τέλεσης ποινικού αδικήματος από τους κυρίους Τσοχατζόπουλο και Παπαντωνίου […], που επί μήνες προσεβλήθησαν και διασύρθηκαν αδίκως", από το πόρισμα των Βενιζέλου - Λοβέρδου σχετικά με την υπόθεση των μιζών στα εξοπλιστικά, για την οποία ο Άκης Τσοχατζόπουλος καταδικάστηκε τελικά σε φυλάκιση.

Το "να μην ποινικοποιούμε την πολιτική ζωή του τόπου", δεν είναι απλά στρουθοκαμηλισμός, όπως θα έλεγε κάποιος αφελής, αλλά εντάσσεται στις ορολογίες της μαφίας, όπως η "ομερτά". Βασικά σημαίνει ακριβώς αυτό. Κάτι που η αντίδραση της ΝΔ στο σκάνδαλο Novartis και ο χαρακτηρισμός «κουκουλοφόροι» για τους προστατευόμενους μάρτυρες, απέδειξε περίτρανα.


Το σύστημα που άφησε προίκα ο Κώστας Σημίτης και το οποίο ζει παρασιτικά στη χώρα για πάνω από δύο δεκαετίες, αποτελείται από μετρ της κακοδιαχείρισης. Από αυτούς, ο Γιάννης Στουρνάρας είναι αυτός που «πρόκοψε» περισσότερο με αξιώματα και… πισίνες. Οι υπόλοιποι ή είναι απαξιωμένοι ή έχουν κατηγορηθεί για σκάνδαλα ή είναι στη φυλακή ή φοβούνται ότι θα μπουν.

Προχθές στη δίκη της Siemens, ο πρώην υπεύθυνος οικονομικών του ΠΑΣΟΚ, Σπύρος Αυγερινός, παραδέχθηκε αυτό που υποπτευόμασταν όλοι, ότι δηλαδή, τα χρήματα που πήρε ο Τσουκάτος -ο στενότερος συνεργάτης του Σημίτη- από την Siemens το 1999 κατέληξαν πράγματι στα ταμεία του ΠΑΣΟΚ.

Αυτό ας πούμε όμως ότι αυτό το περιμέναμε, δεν προκάλεσε έκπληξη. Αυτό που θα μας φαινόταν αδιανόητο όμως μέχρι πριν από λίγα χρόνια είναι κάτι που ίσως δεν παρατήρησαν πολλοί. Η ΝΔ δεν έβγαλε ούτε μισή ανακοίνωση για το θέμα.

Παράλογο; Όχι. Λογικότατο. Το «σύστημα Σημίτη», που εν πολλοίς διοικεί ακόμα τη χώρα, έχει συμμαχήσει με τον Κυριάκο Μητσοτάκη. Τους ενώνει άλλωστε η Siemens, ο Χριστοφοράκος και η απόδοση ευθυνών για τη διαφθορά και τη χρεοκοπία στην κοινωνία, στον απλό κόσμο. Αυτό ακριβώς είχε πει ο Κώστας Σημίτης πριν από λίγο καιρό σε συνέντευξή του στο ΣΚΑΙ… με το αμίμητο: «η διαφθορά είναι κοινωνικό φαινόμενο». Πόσο σημαντικό να το ακούς αυτό από τον πρώην πρωθυπουργό, που στο τότε υπουργικό του συμβούλιο, ο καλύτερος έχει πουλήσει τη μάνα του… με υπερτιμολόγηση!

Δεν είναι τυχαίο πως οι επιθέσεις στη διακυβέρνηση Καραμανλή, αλλά και τον ίδιο τον πρώην πρωθυπουργό, εξαπολύονται συντεταγμένα από πρόσωπα του νεοφιλελεύθερου «μετώπου της λογικής» και δημοσιογράφους της «αυλής» Μητσοτάκη.

Επί των κυβερνήσεών Κώστα Σημίτη, η διαπλοκή γιγαντώθηκε. Υπερτιμολογήθηκε, εις βάρος του Έλληνα φορολογούμενου, ότι δημόσιο έργο υπήρχε και δεν υπήρχε. Κάναμε “αλλαξοκωλιές” (swap) με τη Goldman Sachs. Έγινε η μεγαλύτερη αναδιανομή εισοδήματος προς τα πάνω, με το σκάνδαλο του Χρηματιστηρίου. Φιλοξενήσαμε τους Ολυμπιακούς Αγώνες (διαφθοράς & Siemens)… Οτσαλάν, Ίμια, εξοπλιστικά προγράμματα, πράσινα παιδιά παντού, ένταξη στην ΟΝΕ με αμφιλεγόμενα στοιχεία… και η λίστα δεν έχει τέλος.

Τώρα τη δουλειά του Κώστα Σημίτη -που έμεινε στη μέση- θέλουν να τελειώσουν οι Γιάννης Στουρνάρας και Κυριάκος Μητσοτάκης με την ακροδεξιά χωρωδία του… τους ενώνει η κουτάλα.

Πηγή:

Regime change fails: is a military coup or invasion of Venezuela next?

by Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers

Part 2 - US Regime Change Tactics Have Failed In Venezuela

The US and oligarchs continue their efforts to reverse the Bolivarian Revolution. The US has a long history of regime change around the world and has tried all of its regime change tools in Venezuela. So far they have failed.

Economic War

Destroying the Venezuelan economy has been an ongoing campaign by the US and oligarchs. It is reminiscent of the US coup in Chile which ended the presidency of Salvador Allende. To create the environment for the Chilean coup, President Nixon ordered the CIA to “make the economy scream.

Henry Kissinger devised the coup noting a billion dollars of investment were at stake. He also feared the “the insidious model effect” of the example of Chile leading to other countries breaking from the United States and capitalism. Kissinger’s top deputy at the National Security Council, Viron Vaky, opposed the coup saying, “What we propose is patently a violation of our own principles and policy tenets .… If these principles have any meaning, we normally depart from them only to meet the gravest threat . . . our survival.

These objections hold true regarding recent US coups, including in Venezuela and Honduras, Ukraine and Brazil, among others. Allende died in the coup and wrote his last words to the people of Chile, especially the workers, “Long live the people! Long live the workers!” He was replaced by Augusto Pinochet, a brutal and violent dictator.

For decades the US has been fighting an economic war, “making the economy scream,” in Venezuela. Wealthy Venezuelans have been conducting economic sabotage aided by the US with sanctions and other tactics. This includes hoarding food, supplies and other necessities in warehouses or in Colombia while Venezuelan markets are bare. The scarcity is used to fuel protests, e.g. “The March of the Empty Pots,” a carbon copy of marches in Chile before the September 11, 1973 coup. Economic warfare has escalated through Obama and under Trump, with Tillerson now urging economic sanctions on oil.

President Maduro recognized the economic hardship but also said sanctions open up the opportunity for a new era of independence and “begins the stage of post-domination by the United States, with Venezuela again at the center of this struggle for dignity and liberation.” The second-in-command of the Socialist Party, Diosdado Cabello, said, “[if they] apply sanctions, we will apply elections.

Opposition Protests

Another common US regime change tool is supporting opposition protests. The Trump administration renewed regime change operations in Venezuela and the anti-Maduro protests, which began under Obama, grew more violent. The opposition protests included barricades, snipers and murders as well as widespread injuries. When police arrested those using violence, the US claimed Venezuela opposed free speech and protests.

The opposition tried to use the crack down against violence to achieve the US tactic of dividing the military. The US and western media ignored opposition violence and blamed the Venezuelan government instead. Violence became so extreme it looked like the opposition was pushing Venezuela into a Syrian-type civil war. Instead, opposition violence backfired on them.

Violent protests are part of US regime change repertoire. This was demonstrated in the US coup in Ukraine, where the US spent $5 billion to organize government opposition including US and EU funding violent protesters. This tactic was used in early US coups like the 1953 Iran coup of Prime Minister Mossadegh. The US has admitted organizing this coup that ended Iran’s brief experience with democracy. Like Venezuela, a key reason for the Iran coup was control of the nation’s oil.

Funding Opposition

There has been massive US investment in creating opposition to the Venezuelan government. Tens of millions of dollars have been openly spent through USAID, the National Endowment for Democracy and other related US regime change agencies. It is unknown how much the CIA has spent from its secret budget, but the CIA has also been involved in Venezuela. Current CIA director, Mike Pompeo, said he is “hopeful there can be a transition in Venezuela.

The United States has also educated leaders of opposition movements, e.g. Leopoldo López was educated at private schools in the US, including the CIA-associated Kenyon College. He was groomed at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government and made repeated visits to the regime change agency, the National Republican Institute.

Elections

While the US calls Venezuela a dictatorship, it is in fact a strong democracy with an excellent voting system. Election observers monitor every election.

In 2016, the economic crisis led to the opposition winning a majority in the National Assembly. One of their first acts was to pass an amnesty law. The law described 17 years of crimes including violent felonies and terrorism committed by the opposition. It was an admission of crimes back to the 2002 coup and through 2016. The law demonstrated violent treason against Venezuela. One month later, the Supreme Court of Venezuela ruled the amnesty law was unconstitutional. US media, regime change advocates and anti-Venezuela human rights groups attacked the Supreme Court decision, showing their alliance with the admitted criminals.

Years of violent protests and regime change attempts, and then admitting their crimes in an amnesty bill, have caused those opposed to the Bolivarian Revolution to lose power and become unpopular. In three recent elections Maduro’s party won regional, local and the Constituent Assembly elections.

The electoral commission announced the presidential election will be held on April 22. Maduro will run for re-election with the United Socialist Party. Opposition leaders such as Henry Ramos and Henri Falcon have expressed interest in running, but the opposition has not decided whether to participate. Henrique Capriles, who narrowly lost to Maduro in the last election, was banned from running for office because of irregularities in his campaign, including taking foreign donations. Capriles has been a leader of the violent protests. When his ban was announced he called for protests to remove Maduro from office. Also banned was Leopoldo Lopez, another leader of the violent protests who is under house arrest serving a thirteen year sentence for inciting violence.

Now, the United States says it will not recognize the presidential election and urges a military coup. For two years, the opposition demanded presidential elections, but now it is unclear whether they will participate. They know they are unpopular and Maduro is likely to be re-elected.

Source, links:


[1] [3]

16 February, 2018

US corporate invasion in Colombia assassinates unionists in record numbers

... and shows why the neighboring Venezuela should never surrender to the US bloody imperialism


Political killings in Colombia have increased behind the scenes. In 2017 alone, at least 133 social leaders and activists have been murdered. The victims of these killings are most frequently leaders and activists from indigenous rights, coca crop substitution, Afro-Colombian rights, LGBTQ equality, and labor rights.

Some have been killed by state forces, but the majority have been carried out by right-wing paramilitaries which have documented ties to corporations and the Colombian government.

The UN high commissioner for human rights reported than more than 60% of the killings occurred in areas which were once protected by the FARC, which withdrew its military presence under peace agreement.

In the past 20 years, over 2,500 trade unionists have been murdered in Colombia. More than in every other country put together. Every year, more union workers will be assassinated here than in the whole world combined.

87% of trade unionist murders are never brought to justice. 99.9% of death threats against trade unionists are never going to be investigated by the authorities.

The government has played a more direct role beyond just turning a blind eye to murders. Most recently, ex-paramilitary commanders testified that under president Uribe, top officials in Colombia's intelligence agency, including Uribe's intelligence chief, supplied paramilitaries with a list of trade unionists who were then assassinated.

The killing of labor activists has a long history in Colombia. In 1928, the United Fruit company, the US, and the Colombian government colluded to massacre up to 3,000 striking banana plantation workers and dumped many of their bodies in the sea.

But the labor movement remained the strongest in Latin America. In 1988, nearly one out of ten workers had a union. But at the same time, right-wing paramilitary forces surged from the US dirty wars, and a campaign of terror took its toll. Today, only about 0.5% of Colombian workers are protected by a union contract.

The US government is a large part of this human rights catastrophe. The free-trade agreement signed between the US and Colombia in 2006, not only exacerbates repressive conditions for unions. It reveals how the US bares legal responsibility.

According to the American Federation of Labor, since the trade agreement was signed, workers attempting to exercise their rights have suffered at least 1,466 acts of violence, including 955 death threats and 99 assassinations between 2006 and 2016.

With this, the Federation had argued that the US should invoke provisions in US-Colombia trade deal. But they were rebuffed by the Obama administration in 2016. As the president of the AFL-CIO reported, "we were told by the [United States Trade Representative] general counsel that murdering a trade unionist doesn’t violate these standards, that perpetuating violence against a trade unionist doesn’t violate these agreements."


Have you heard anything about these crimes in Colombia from the hypocrites of the US government? No, they are just 'concerned' about the 'dictator' Maduro and human rights violations in the neighbouring Venezuela.

Well, their huge hypocrisy can be easily explained.

Now that they got rid of the armed-FARC 'headache', the US corporations are ready to loot freely Colombia with the aid of the new paramilitaries. Furthermore, they can focus entirely on their economic war against Venezuela through Colombia, as explained by Venezuela's Minister of Economic Planning, Ricardo Menéndez.

Colombia has now definitely fallen to the hands of the US imperialist hawks. Next target: Venezuela.

Related: