The oligarchs behind the “humanitarian” regime change network now exploiting Jo Cox’s death to push for UK Labour split
Only
by masking their otherwise unpopular policies in the cloak of Jo
Cox’s tragedy, and humanity’s natural empathy for good samaritans
and the downtrodden, has this small group of powerful individuals
been able to launder disastrous wars and military adventurism as “the
right thing to do.”
by
Vanessa Beeley and Whitney Webb
Part
10 - Using Jo Cox to divide the Labour Party
A more
worrying development that has emerged from the exploitation of the
murder of MP Jo Cox is the apparent attempt to divide the already
beleaguered Labour Party and to undermine its leadership, in
particular Jeremy Corbyn.
Cox
herself turned against Corbyn shortly before she was killed in 2016
and was forced to apologize after a newsletter had been circulated by
one of her aides with the headline “Why I knifed Corbyn.” Two
weeks prior, Cox had co-written an article with Neil Coyle in the
Guardian, expressing regret over nominating Corbyn and
dissatisfaction with his leadership.
Shortly
after Cox’s murder, billionaire Branson came into conflict with
Corbyn over the privatization of the rail services in the U.K. Corbyn
was pushing for public ownership and this came into direct
confrontation with the business objectives of Branson’s Virgin
empire.
On many
fronts Corbyn is challenging the establishment paradigm. As
journalist Jonathan Cook explained, “Corbyn is being destroyed,
like blowing up a bridge to stop an advancing army.” Part of
the advancing army is Corbyn’s apparent determination to
investigate and bring an end to military intervention by the British
government and its allies. This has set the cat among the Syria
“regime-change” pigeons, who have striven towards the
destabilization of Syria for at least eight years, many for longer.
When the
Labour MP and close ally of Corbyn, Chris Williamson, tweeted his
support for the co-author of this report, Vanessa Beeley, the
NATO-aligned twittersphere was outraged. Oz Katerji, long-time
supporter of the Syrian “revolution” and vocal detractor of the
Syrian government, rose to blow up the bridges in an article for the
New Statesman.
Katerji
has close ties to NATO-aligned “research” website Bellingcat,
which has been instrumental in maintaining international pressure
upon the Syrian government by supporting the chemical-weapon
narratives generated by the White Helmets. Bellingcat’s founder,
Eliot Higgins, is employed by the Atlantic Council, which is funded
by the U.K., UAE, and U.S. weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin,
among others. Katerji is closely involved with the refugee “crisis,”
on the “frontlines” as a team member of the Help Refugees NGO.
The common factors that link all members of the
war-for-peace-in-Syria cartel become more blatant as we delve deeper
into their activities and connections.
Help
Refugees is supported by none other than Soros’s Open Society
Foundation and the Radcliffe Foundation, led by by
philanthro-capitalist billionaire Frank Giustra, among other
influential foundations. (Giustra’s connections to the billionaire
network were covered in Part 2 of this series)
Katerji
is also a dedicated promoter of the White Helmets, often seen
attacking comments on Twitter that provide evidence of the White
Helmet affiliations to extremist groups, including Nusra Front and
ISIS. Katerji has been hosted by the Fabian Society in the House of
Lords to discuss the refugee “crisis” in relation to Syria. Jo
Cox’s connections to the Fabian Society are examined in Part 1 of
this series.
In the
New Statesman article, Katerji invoked the name of Jo Cox to
effectively divide the Labour party along clearly defined lines. On
one side, those Labour MPs who will not swing into war on the
coat-tails of the Conservative Party, on the other those who would
align themselves with the Blairite policies of “intervention at all
costs.” Jo Cox is being used as a banner under which the Blairites
can renew their campaigns to “do more” in Syria, which
effectively signals greater military and economic pressure upon the
Syrian people and perpetual war. For the Blairites, war can be
prevented only by the departure of the Syrian Government and its
replacement with an Islamist regime that would signify the end of
Syria’s secular culture. This is an agenda that is not aligned with
the wishes of the majority of the Syrian people, a fact that is
apparently of no consequence to the “Jo Cox party.”
The
title of Katerji’s hit piece, indirectly aimed at Corbyn, was
“Labour can be Jo Cox’s party or Chris Williamson’s – it
cannot be both.” His article ends with the claim that there is a
“war for the heart of the Labour party underway; ultimately
Labour cannot be both the party of Jo Cox and the party of Chris
Williamson. If Williamson’s latest endorsement receives no censure
from the Labour leader’s office, the answer to that question will
be heard loudly and clearly all the way from Westminster to
Damascus.”
Katerji
is right in one way, but what is happening is a much bigger war. It
is a war against humanity. A war during which we must connect
ourselves even more closely to the peoples of nations under attack by
the perpetual war industry sustained by the billionaire network. The
powers that be are exploiting every possible avenue to demonize those
who would challenge their agenda. From “anti-Semitism” to
“genocide denial,” they are weaponizing tragedy and history to
serve their own purposes. As Jonathan Cook puts it: “The
corporate elites have no plan to go quietly. Unless we can build our
ranks quickly and make our case confidently, their antics will ensure
the paradigm shift is violent rather than healing. An earthquake, not
a storm.”
Source,
links, further info:
Related:
Comments
Post a Comment