Skip to main content

Stein, Sanders, Gabbard, Warren: the right time for the progressives to join forces against the US bipartisan dictatorship

by system failure

The recent confirmation by the former interim chairperson of the Democratic Party, Donna Brazile, that Hillary Clinton proceeded in an internal "coup" to exclude Bernie Sanders from the race for the Democratic nomination, has vanished the slightest doubt for what the Party has become.
 
The Democrats have been serving the US corporate/banking elite for decades, but the ethical deterioration of the Party had taken an accelerated course since the early 90s under Clinton administration. Indeed, the Democrats adopted the neoliberal doctrine policies to such an extent that ended to become a second Republican party within the US. The elites secured their absolute domination through the establishment of the bipartisan dictatorship. Especially since the early 90s, it didn't matter at all who was in power. Either with Democrats or the Republicans, the US deep state and the ruthless neocons have seen their agenda fully implemented through for-profit wars and through the gradual destruction of social state in the US.

The evil face of neoliberalism had become clear a decade earlier under Reagan administration. The biggest fairy tale that the neoliberal priesthood managed to sell to the masses was the trickle-down Reaganomics. The big fairy tale was fully exposed by the 2007-08 crisis from which the West still struggles to recover.

Finally, Barack Obama himself, and even some liberal pundits from the mainstream media, were forced to admit that Reaganomics simply don't work. Yet, it seems that this was just a strategic maneuver by the establishment to persuade American voters that the Democratic party starts to distant itself from the neoliberal doctrine, and therefore, it is worth to vote a Black American as the next US president who could make the difference in favor of the majority after decades.

But the Obama era was another big disappointment for the real progressives. Despite all promises, nothing changed. Wall Street continued to enjoy the most privileged position in the US economy. Not a single banker went in jail. Abroad, the US contacted proxy wars destroying Libya and bringing chaos in Syria. Indirect help was given to Saudi Arabia to bombard civilians in Yemen. Drone strikes reached record level with most of the victims not being the primary target. Whistleblowers have been hunted fiercely. Police state and brutality have been reinforced.

Then, Hillary Clinton came. And the corporate Democrats had nothing new to present about her as she was coming straight from the old school of the Machiavellian Clintonian empire. It was more than obvious that the neocon/neoliberal agenda would have been continued uninterrupted under her potential presidency, without any divergence from the schedule. The only trick that was left for the liberal media to promote Hillary, was identity politics.

Then, the corporate media pundits were shocked when they realized that Donald Trump will be the next president of the United States. Yet, their media were promoting him during all the presidential race, "surprisingly", even more than their favorite, Hillary Clinton. The markets were going down for a moment, but then, nothing happened. It looked like a well-directed live show by the monstrous mechanisms of the establishment.

Then, you could witness the first signs of fear and embarrassment on pundits' voices and faces, when they were monitoring the rapid rise of Bernie Sanders against Hillary Clinton. And then, consider this: why they were constantly monitoring Bernie's and Hillary's strength against Trump's, with such an anxiety? They were doing this quite long before knowing the final result of the Democratic primaries. The answer is simple: because they wanted to see whether they should act seriously to put Bernie out of the game by all means.

When they saw with terror that Bernie was beating Trump by a far more significant percentage than Hillary, they knew that they had to get rid of him. It was much easier to do it in the primaries with the unfair and undemocratic system of superdelegates and the inside war from DNC. They wouldn't risk to see Bernie at the finals with Trump, where the whole world would watch closely. Indeed, WikiLeaks revealed that the DNC establishment had launched a dirty war against Bernie, but also that, some lobbyists wanted to get rid of him too.

So, the United States superpower ended with someone like Donald Trump in the presidency. The 'anti-establishment' Donald joke has already collapsed. What did Donald do so far? The usual, and he is just warming up:

- Literally hired Goldman Sachs to run USA.
- Signed a bill to deregulate again Wall Street, so that the parasites of the financial mafia to be able to play their games at the expense of the majority, as happened so many times in the past, causing big financial crises.
- Quickly aligned with the neocon agenda and bombed Syria. In fact, the Donald did even more than the puppet of the establishment, Barack Obama, by provoking dangerously war games in Asia-Pacific.
- Maintained US forces in Iraq, Afghanistan, continued the US interference in Yemen and elsewhere.
- Pursued a totally unacceptable health care program that - in case it will pass - will push millions of Americans further to the cliff, without even a rudimentary social safety net.
- Continued to hunt fiercely all Whistleblowers.
- Wants to pass more tax-cuts for the plutocracy.

So, after so much experience, we should know by now that the US bipartisan dictatorship won't change, by no means. And you can't change something that has been completely taken over by the banksters and the corporate lobbyists.

Yet, the bipartisan monster is so powerful that the real progressives will need all the power they can get, in order to have a good chance to beat it.

The 2016 electoral process in the US was particularly useful because it highlighted many interesting unprecedented aspects. One of them, is that you don't need the mainstream media to promote you. Especially the young Americans discovered and promoted Bernie Sanders through the independent and social media on the Internet. Another aspect, is that you don't need big money to support you. These new conditions could be proven valuable towards the creation of a third political movement, coming straight from the people, which could seriously challenge the current corrupted political establishment.

We can think at least four progressives that should join forces to lead such a political movement right now: Jill Stein, Bernie Sanders, Tulsi Gabbard, Elizabeth Warren.

All four should be unconditionally devoted at least to the following:

- Free health care and education, re-build the social state

- Definitely anti-war, anti-intervention

- Definitely anti-Wall Street

- Pro-environmental

- Pro-workers

All four have exhibit hopeful signs with their political behavior so far towards such policies that could literally change radically the course of the American society for the benefit of the majority, against the elites. However, it seems that still, in many cases, they were forced to follow US Congress decisions against of some of these principles, especially concerning the US permanent policy of endless war, or direct/indirect intervention.

Well, imagine that: the establishment already treats them as 'radicals'! Anyone who dares to decline, even slightly, from the neocon/neoliberal agenda in the US political life, is automatically blacklisted and painted as 'radical'. And that happens exactly because, for the first time, the establishment saw with terror that the mainstream media narratives don't work. So, in reality, the real fear of the establishment is the American people.

And that's another reason for which the people of the United States need a third political party coming straight from them, not the billionaire class. And this means that progressives like Stein, Sanders, Gabbard and Warren, who exhibit a promising political behaviour, will be able to free themselves from any tight establishment control, in order to become the 'tools' that will deliver literally, for the first time, the real power to the American people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Just when the DNC "barons" openly call for a coup against Bernie Sanders, Politico accidentally reveals Bloomberg's real mission: "slow Sanders' delegate march" on Super Tuesday

globinfo freexchange
The sequence of events should not be considered random. It all started with a key question on the recent Democratic-primaries debate stage in Las Vegas.
MSNBC's Chuck Todd (you know, the one who described Bernie Sanders supporters as a "digital brownshirt brigade"), asked the candidates if the person with the most delegates at the end of the primary season should be the nominee even if they don't have a majority of the delegates. Of all the candidates, only Sanders answered positively, without hesitation. Something which, of course, shouldn't surprise us much.
The whole matter circulated around the corporate and the independent media for a while, with the progressives attempting to capitalize Bernie's response, in order to demonstrate his deeply democratic "reflexes" against the rest of the establishment candidates.
But it seems that the question was put in place by the establishment in order to test the "reflexes" of …

Another astroturfing operation against Bernie Sanders fails miserably

... right before the battle in South Carolina
globinfo freexchange
We are about to lose count of the number and different types of smear campaigns and dirty tricks that the DNC establishment has tried against Bernie Sanders so far. 
As the DNC "barons" and their super-wealthy donors understand now that Sanders' big power lies within a continuously growing, progressive movement behind him, they are trying to deal with it through the practice of astroturfing. In short, they are trying to undermine Bernie's authentic, grassroots movement, with a virtual one.

We witnessed another operation of this type during the latest Democratic debate, right before the next primaries battle in South Carolina. The operation involved an audience of supposedly authentic, ordinary voters, who, quite strangely enough, booed Sanders and cheered the billionaire Bloomberg!

Yet, one more time, progressive independent media (along with Sanders), exposed the new trick immediately.




As the Commondr…

Η πανδημία ακυρώνει προσωρινά τα σχέδια των νεοφιλελεύθερων τζιχαντιστών του Μητσοτακικού καθεστώτος

globinfo freexchange
Η αυτοδυναμία που πήρε η χειρότερη δεξιά της μεταπολίτευσης στις τελευταίες εκλογές, άνοιξε διάπλατα το δρόμο στη φράξια των νεοφιλελεύθερων τζιχαντιστών της, προκειμένου να πραγματοποιήσουν την τελική τους επέλαση ενάντια στο κοινωνικό κράτος.
Είναι σίγουρο ότι στα σχέδια υπήρχε η ιδιωτικοποίηση και του Εθνικού Συστήματος Υγείας, καθώς η φράξια ενισχύθηκε σημαντικά με την εκλογή φανατικών του νεοφιλελεύθερου δόγματος, όπως ο Μπάμπης Παπαδημητρίου.
Ήδη κάνουν το γύρο του διαδικτύου τα ηχητικά του Παπαδημητρίου που δήλωνε πως "Από τα κρατικά νοσοκομεία τα μισά τουλάχιστον πρέπει να κλείσουν. Γιατί είναι φορείς ασθενειών, γιατί έχουν πρόβλημα ...", με τον Άρη Πορτοσάλτε να συμφωνεί και να επαυξάνει λέγοντας πως πρέπει "όχι απλώς να κλείσουν, αλλά να γκρεμιστούν". 

Όμως η επέλαση της πρόσφατης πανδημίας, λόγω κορονοϊού, έμελλε να αναβάλει, τουλάχιστον προς το παρόν, τα "υγρά όνειρα" των φανατικών του Μητσοτακικού καθεστώτος για αθρόες ιδ…

It's actually the liberal elites that are now on the ropes, not Bernie Sanders

globinfo freexchange

Bernie Sanders' latest defeat in another round of the Democratic presidential primaries was received by most of the liberal corporate media almost as his political ending. Just take a quick look at the headlines. You will immediately recognize a bizarre anxiety by most of them to portray Joe Biden as the ultimate winner in the mother of all battles.
One more time, the liberal apparatus has been exposed, giving one more evidence that the liberal elites are considering Sanders as a biggest threat than even Donald Trump. One more time, the liberal establishment completely justified the perception circulated among many progressives: corporate Democrats would rather lose to Trump again than give Sanders the leadership of the party.

So, why all this anxiety?

First of all, the primaries are not over yet. Sanders may have suffered another defeat, but he won't give up easily. And the fact that he is still there, ready to crush Biden in a debate with just the two of…

Bernie's most powerful secret weapon is not Latinos

globinfo freexchange
A lot of discussion circulated around the independent and the corporate media about Sanders campaign ability to approach successfully the Latino community.
Progressive reporters and journalists of The Hill's Rising show went further on the issue, claiming that the Latino vote is Bernie's secret weapon on Super Tuesday, as it has been proven to work so far in the primaries.

While, undoubtedly, the Latino vote will be crucial on the outcome of the Democratic primaries process, it is not Bernie's biggest secret weapon. Bernie has another potential secret weapon - much more powerful - that could make him sweep the primaries and even grab the number of delegates that the DNC demands. And the good news is that he is the only one who could activate it.
Right before the decisive Super Tuesday battle, two DNC agents, Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar, were ordered to withdraw their nominations in order to unify the moderate vote around the "dinosaur" J…

REVEALED: Chief magistrate in Assange case received financial benefits from secretive partner organisations of UK Foreign Office

The senior judge overseeing the extradition proceedings of WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange received financial benefits from two partner organisations of the British Foreign Office before her appointment, it can be revealed.
by Matt Kennard and Mark Curtis 
Part 4 - Same addresses
Declassified has discovered that the addresses given by Lord Arbuthnot and other parliamentarians for Tertulias and Tatlidil have been the same — despite no obvious connection between the two organisations other than the UK Foreign Office. All the addresses are residential with no clear reason why they would be official addresses of high-level Foreign Office-linked fora.
In 2012, Arbuthnot recorded in his parliamentary register of interests that the address of both organisations was a Grade II listed house in the village of Cowlinge, Suffolk, which has a population of just over 600 people. From 2013-16, the address changed to a house in Higham, a small village with 140 people, also in Suffolk.
The land regis…

Julian Assange extradition hearing sees US attack bravery, press freedom

The Grayzone
A hearing on the US effort to extradite Julian Assange for charges brought under the Espionage Act has begun in London. Satirist and broadcaster Randy Credico, a friend of Assange, discusses the stakes involved: an unprecedented assault on press freedom and a media publisher who has exposed the crimes and secrets of the US establishment. 

'You'll see rebellion': Sanders supporters denounce open threats by superdelegates to steal nomination

"The Democrats might be able to stop Sanders, but in doing so they would destroy their party's own electoral prospects."
by Jake Johnson Nearly 100 Democratic superdelegates told the New York Times in interviews this week that if Sen. Bernie Sanders does not arrive at the party's 2020 convention in July with a majority of pledged delegates, they are willing to thwart the will of the plurality of primary voters—and potentially risk damaging Democrats' chances of defeating President Donald Trump—in order to stop Sanders from winning the nomination. 
"In a reflection of the establishment's wariness about Mr. Sanders," the Times reported Thursday morning, "only nine of the 93 superdelegates interviewed said that Mr. Sanders should become the nominee purely on the basis of arriving at the convention with a plurality, if he was short of a majority."
The superdelegates, many of whom are current elected officials, are "willing to risk intrapar…

Joe Biden, same old wars, same old interventionism: Ex-State Dept adviser warns of VP's hawkishness

Moderate Rebels
Democratic presidential front-runner Joe Biden has for decades supported wars and military interventions across the planet. Max Blumenthal and Ben Norton speak with former State Department Russia adviser James Carden about his experience in the Obama administration. They discuss the ex vice president's role in the wars on Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Yugoslavia; his hawkishness against Russia and China; his destructive policies in Latin America; and the Biden family's corruption in Ukraine.


'Organized money vs. Organized People': New Sanders memo details stark choice between Biden and Bernie

"Voters face a decision between Bernie's working-class movement and his message of change, and Biden's effort to—in his own words—make sure that 'nothing will fundamentally change' for the billionaire class."
by Jake Johnson
Sen. Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign sent a memo to staffers and surrogates Monday evening spotlighting "stark" policy differences between Sanders and Joe Biden on Social Security, trade, and other major issues after the former vice president received a wave of high-profile endorsements on the eve of Super Tuesday.
The memo, authored by Sanders campaign manager Faiz Shakir and senior adviser Jeff Weaver, characterizes Biden's endorsements from Pete Buttigieg, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Beto O'Rourke, and former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid as part of an effort by the former vice president to "coalesce the Washington establishment and its big donors around his campaign to protect the status quo."…