Skip to main content

Another example showing that the establishment narratives and methods rapidly decline

UK election


The following example, presented by Jimmy Dore in his show, is another sign that the classic narratives and methods of the establishment to maintain the pro-plutocracy neoliberal agenda, are fading rapidly. All it takes, is a good speaker with simple, sensible speech, to repel the absurdity behind the 'logic' of the corporate agents in the media.

In this interview, Sarah Champion, Shadow Secretary of State for Women and Equalities for the Labour Party in the UK, actually exposes this absurdity, by just making some sense.

Champion starts with a very sensible sentence which any political party should take for granted:

           What we are trying to do, here today, is have a campaign that is based on facts, that is genuinely looking at how we can benefit everybody in this country.

The response from the media pundit is the most typical for those who adopt the classic (and obsolete now), neoliberal narrative, resembling the old, well-known Thatcherism. Therefore, he tries to interpret a very straight and clear answer according to this neoliberal dogma:

           But basically what you're saying is that we are going to spend money on nice things and we're going to do it by squeezing people who won't feel the pain ...

Well, no pretexts are kept here. This is the personification of a system that works for the elites who want to pay less and less taxes for the benefit of the rest of the society, even when they exploit the state to make more money and even when they see their profits grow enormously, in many cases without moving a finger. (Notice how Jimmy Dore hilariously comments on the obvious absurdity of this statement at 10:12.)

So, this was very easily repealed by Champion, again through simple logic and real rationality, contrary to the distorted rationality of the neoliberal establishment that has become mainstream over the decades.:

           If nice things are things like education, about taking care of when you're poorly, then, yes, we think those sorts of things are very important, ... and, yes, that means that some people and particularly businesses that are making a big profit, and they are not reinvesting it back to our country, yes, we will be looking at them paying their fair share.

Then, again, the response of the representative of the establishment comes from the 'manual' of the classic neoliberal narratives, based on the deliberately simplified (and therefore, false) equation that cutting taxes for big corporations equals more jobs:

           Where is your evidence that they are not reinvesting it back in the economy? We do, after all, have record levels of employment.

Champion beats him again by simply telling the truth:

           What I'm looking at, our businesses that are taking the money offshore, that are not looking at paying their employees properly ... what we want to see is that wealth is shared out, because really, when you look at the business, they are using the infrastructure, they are benefiting from the education system we've got. So, paying your fair share back in again, that seems very sensible to me.

Then, when the pundit sees that he is about to suffer a heavy defeat by an intelligent speaker, it's time to disorientate the discussion towards the 'identity politics' (as also noticed by Jimmy Dore). Pay attention to a common trick used by the establishment mouthpieces here, as the pundit deliberately starts his next question with additional emphasis, highlighting the fact that Sarah Champion is Shadow Secretary of State for Women and Equalities, in order to harm her credibility and, therefore, the credibility of the Labour Party, against all women, therefore, the half electorate:

           You are Shadow Secretary of State for Women and Equalities. Why do you think it is that the Conservatives have now had two women Prime Ministers and Labour haven't had any?

Champion laughs against this effort of the pundit to disorientate the discussion away from the substance of the politics and gives, again, the right, sensible answer:

           Why do you think it is that in the budget that we've just had, 86% of the cuts and changes the Treasury made, fell on women's shoulders, how is that about equality? They are the sort of big questions that we're looking at, not looking at one individual. We're looking at how is it that certain groups in our society are facing the biggest cuts? Why is it that low mothers are repeatedly not reaching their full potential? ...

Notice that, for the first time, the pundit interrupts Champion (probably because they are shouting in his microphone to smear her), in a last, desperate effort to disorientate discussion away from the substance of the politics:

           You're telling us Jeremy Corbyn would be a better Prime Minister than Theresa May, so, you are looking at individuals, aren't you?

But he gets again the appropriate answer:

Yes, what's that got to do with her being a woman, or not?


It is worth to remember that 'identity politics' were used extensively by the establishment, especially during the primaries of the Democratic party in the US in favor of Hillary Clinton and against the biggest threat for the establishment, Bernie Sanders. As pointed in previous article:

The establishment becomes highly predictable, which is a sign of saturation. It is remarkable how the establishment mechanisms use similar narratives everywhere to expel undesirable politicians and policies.

Just one paragraph from the article My Hail Bernie Pass by Fred Baumgarten, describes almost the whole situation: “Now that I’m proclaiming my support for Sanders, I expect the vitriol to be no less intense, though maybe from some other quarters with different arguments. Secretly my friends will suspect that maybe I’m a misogynist, too, and don’t want a female president. I’ll be accused of being 'impractical' and 'hopelessly idealistic,' and of 'wasting' my vote. And I’ll still be held personally responsible for getting Trump elected!

One of the most successful psychological techniques used by the mechanisms of the establishment, is the bombardment of mind with isolated words, or, phrases, ending up to become powerful symbols. These symbols are frequently so powerful that manage to prevail over the ability of mind to build a rational hierarchy. Which, many times, equals to heavy misjudgment.

For example, the fact that the United States will have the opportunity to be governed "for the first time in their history by a female president", often prevails over what this president truly represents, especially among the female voters. The election of Hillary will give a superficial satisfaction to many Americans, that the United States will become an even more progressive society (after Obama term), while in reality, Hillary will certainly follow the "politics as usual", totally aligned with the neocon agenda.

Psychological methods also use "logical leaps" to force the individual to bypass a certain rational hierarchy. The example in Baumgarten's paragraph above is characteristic: even his friends will suspect that he is a misogynist, just by saying that he will support Sanders instead of Clinton. The political arguments, which is the main issue in such a process, since they determine the policies that will have direct effect to millions of Americans, are bypassed through this absurdly simplified "logical leap": You vote for Sanders = You are probably a misogynist.

So, in our current example, the establishment pundit follows a similar method. He tries to present the Labour Party as being not friendly to women's rights through the absurdly simplified observation that it has a male leader against the Concervatives who have a female one. Yet, his mission fails miserably because he gets the right answer from Champion, proving that the policies and the level of progressiveness of each party have nothing to do with their leader being male or female.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hyper-educated poor: one of the last 'achievements' of collapsing capitalism

globinfo freexchange
Truthdig's Robert Scheer spoke with Alissa Quart about the "hyper-educated poor" phenomenon on the context of her new book.
An interesting part of the story is the bizarre psychology of 'self-blaming', identified in most of these highly educated people who are increasingly struggling to find a job proportional to their skills and knowledge.
Quart explains:
You have $1.5 trillion student debt. You have, an income inequality thrumming under all this. Since 1997 the top one percent, its income has grown 20 times faster than the other 90 percent. It’s so high now, and the gap is so great. And you have this whole world of counselors and coaches and certificate programs that, I think of them as like vultures on the carcass of the middle class. Also, when you’re talking about race, the whites’ median wealth is 68 times the median wealth of African Americans.
So, in the middle class, it starts to mirror that too; I talked to an African American woman who …

Highly suspicious latest poll shows corporate Democrats will promote Joe Biden against Bernie Sanders

globinfo freexchange
Just when we were writing this story, David Doel of the Rational National already uploaded a relevant video, which shows how obvious are the tricks of the establishment and how fast can be uncovered in our days.

The video is about a recent poll which highlights the Democrats that could beat Trump:

Spot on.
To expand a little further Doel's insightful analysis, we simply compared how the poll was presented by two different types of media. The independent leftist Common Dreams took the results from Politico, presented them under the title By Double-Digit Margin, Poll Shows Sanders Mopping the Floor With Trump in Latest 2020 Matchup, and put the picture of Bernie Sanders at the top.
Politico itself (part of the liberal establishment media), didn't put any winner in the title. However, as you can see, there is a picture of Joe Biden at the top with the phrase "Former Vice President Joe Biden leads President Donald Trump in a hypothetical 2020 match-up, 43 perc…

How normal human behavior became a false mental disorder epidemic

globinfo freexchange
In the early nineties, an epidemic of mental disorder was sweeping America and Britain. It had been uncovered by a new system for identifying disorders. Psychiatry had been attacked for relying on the personal and fallible judgement of psychiatrists.
But instead, a new objective method based on checklists had been invented. These listed only the objective symptoms, and deliberately did not enquire into why the individuals felt an anxiety. In the late 80s, nationwide surveys had revealed an incredible picture: more than 50% of Americans suffered from mental disorders.
But at the very same, the drug companies had announced that they had created a new type of drug, called an SSRI, which they claimed, targeted the circuits inside the brain that were causing these malfunctions. The SSRIs were marketed under names like "Prozac". What they did was alter the amounts of serotonin that flowed across the circuit connections within the brain, and they readjusted the …

Western nations were never set up as democracies - and it's going to get even worse

globinfo freexchange
As Yanis Varoufakis said in this recent interview:
Europe and the United States were never set up as democracies. Read the Federalist Papers. It was all an attempt to make sure that the riffraff do not control governments. We hark back to the Magna Carta. The Magna Carta was not a democratic instrument, it was a charter of barons. It was all about their right to have slaves and not to be taxed by the king.
Aristotle defined, I think, democracy very well even though he was anti-democratic. He said it's a system of governance where the many — and therefore the poor, who are always in the majority — control government.
It is impossible for our sophisticated societies to become sustainable without democracy. Democracy is not a luxury.
If you go to Europe today, what unites them [people] is a sense of hopelessness. A sense that their democracies have been usurped, that their democratic rights mean absolutely nothing, that there is a decision making process, which combi…

WikiLeaks paper reveals US officials intervened to cancel New Zealand's Labour Party fundraising event for Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11

The WIKILEAKS Public Library of US Diplomacy (PlusD)holds the world's largest searchable collection of United States confidential, or formerly confidential, diplomatic communications. As of April 8, 2013 it holds 2 million records comprising approximately 1 billion words. The collection covers US involvements in, and diplomatic or intelligence reporting on, every country on earth. It is the single most significant body of geopolitical material ever published. The PlusD collection, built and curated by WikiLeaks, is updated from a variety of sources, including leaks, documents released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and documents released by the US State Department systematic declassification review.
globinfo freexchange
A cable from July 30, 2004, reveals that the US officials put high pressure on the then Government of New Zealand to cancel a fundraising event for Michael Moore's documentary Fahrenheit 9/11*, under the umbrella of the Labour Party. Although the ev…

WikiLeaks paper reveals key player in the first Argentinian collapse expressed to US officials his desire to overthrow Kirchner and bring back the IMF

The WIKILEAKS Public Library of US Diplomacy (PlusD)holds the world's largest searchable collection of United States confidential, or formerly confidential, diplomatic communications. As of April 8, 2013 it holds 2 million records comprising approximately 1 billion words. The collection covers US involvements in, and diplomatic or intelligence reporting on, every country on earth. It is the single most significant body of geopolitical material ever published. The PlusD collection, built and curated by WikiLeaks, is updated from a variety of sources, including leaks, documents released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and documents released by the US State Department systematic declassification review.
globinfo freexchange
A cable from February 2009, reveals that Domingo Cavallo*, a key player in the 2001 Argentinian collapse, was expressing to the US side his desire to see the IMF return to Argentina. He was also expressing his desire to see the Kirchner administration &…

Tulsi Gabbard: the very same terrorists responsible for 9/11 attacks are the US ground force in Syria

globinfo freexchange
Nearly two years ago, Tulsi Gabbard introduced a bill to stop the US from arming terrorists in Syria. Two years later, the US proxies are losing the war, yet the Empire refuses to accept the defeat. Gabbard spoke with Jimmy Dore and gave, one more time, the real picture. Not only the terrorists in Syria are essentially the US ground force, but also, the Saudis are paying vast amounts of money to the US to promote their agenda in the Middle East.
Key points:
Not only are [Saudis] paying for these wars and using our sons and daughters lives to carry out their bidding, but they're also paying a lot of these think tanks in Washington. A ton of money to issue opinions, and ideas, and plans, and proposals that jive with their agenda.
Specifically in Syria, now, since 2011, both overtly and covertly, the United States has been providing arms, intelligence and equipment to fighters who are allied with, fighting alongside, working with Al-Qaeda in this regime change war.
S…

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - neoliberal establishment 0-3 ... so far

globinfo freexchange
More than a month ago, we identified an immediate mobilization of the establishment machine to push progressives into the establishment lines after the 'shocking' victory of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Under the fierce pressure of the corporate media, Cortez was essentially forced to declare loyalty to Nancy Pelosi. That was a first, significant victory of the establishment against Cortez and the progressive movement.
After that, we saw an unexplained and bizarre contribution of both Bernie Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez to the establishment pro-McCain 'litanies'. In this totally unnecessary self-recruitment for the McCain's legacy whitewash operation, Cortez retreated unconditionally and the establishment marked a second victory against her.
Now, the establishment 'scored' one more time, as Cortez was forced to endorse establishment's agent, Andrew Cuomo.


We mentioned already that corporate media will focus mainly on pushing progressives to b…

Here is why Brexit happened ... and why this is only a start

failed evolution
The European Parliament voted on Wednesday to sanction Hungary for neglecting norms on democracy, civil rights and corruption in a first bid to launch the punitive process of the EU treaty’s Article 7.
Poland said it will oppose any sanctions imposed by the EU on fellow member Hungary, accused of floating EU rules on democracy. “Every country has its sovereign right to make internal reforms it deems appropriate,” Poland’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement late on Wednesday. “Actions aimed against member states serve only deepening divides in the EU, increasing citizens’ current lack of confidence to European institutions.

We are talking about the Union that faithfully followed the US empire in supporting the neo-nazis in Ukraine.
This is the Union that contributed to Gaddafi's ugly ending and the subsequent chaos in Libya.
This is the Union that remains completely silent in front of the Yemen humanitarian disaster, caused by the US-Saudi evil alliance.
This is t…

The establishment tools have recently eliminated a very promising progressive - here is how they did it

globinfo freexchange
In the following video, Kyle Kulinski describes how he schooled Fox tools on progressive policies. The debate was set up on the occasion of another 'interview' (4:18 - 5:22 in the video) in which Cori Bush appeared to be quite unprepared to deal with Fox’s aggressive style. Unfortunately, shortly after this ugly attack, Cori Bush, a very promising progressive, lost in primaries, and 'surprisingly', most of the establishment media (both liberal and conservative), indirectly welcomed the result with a kind of relief.


Many progressives reacted with a kind of embarrassment on Cori Bush's response, yet in reality she did nothing wrong. It was certain tactics by the Fox tool that made Bush appear unreliable, and in this case, these tactics were (unfortunately) successful.
Examine again the video.
First of all, the Fox tool literally invaded in the place and started aggressively asking questions to Cori Bush about that tax issue. The tactic is very common…