Skip to main content

Climate denial, Trumpism, and neoliberalism

Contrary to some superficial interpretations Trumpism represents an intensification of neoliberalism in the United States

by William I. Robinson

There is more than meets the eye in President-elect Trump’s pick to head the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Scott Pruitt, the Oklahoma attorney general, is a notorious climate change denier. He is part of a coalition of public figures suing over EPA programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and boasts that he is “a leading advocate against the EPA’s activist agenda.” A Trump press release railed against the EPA’s “out of control anti-energy agenda” and promised that Pruitt would “reverse the trend” towards measures to reduce global warming.

Contrary to some superficial interpretations, Trumpism represents an intensification of neoliberalism in the United States. His incoming regime’s far-right agenda constitutes a deepening, not a reversal, of the program of capitalist globalization pursued by the Obama administration and every U.S. administration since Ronald Reagan. The crisis of global capitalism has become more acute in the face of economic stagnation and the rise of anti-globalization populism on both the left and the right of the political spectrum. Trumpism does not represent a break with capitalist globalization but rather the recomposition of political forces and ideological discourse as the crisis deepens.

But if Trumpism is an incarnation of an emerging dictatorship of the transnational capitalist class, what does this have to do with climate denial?

As Noemi Klein points out in This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs The Climate, it is not just the fossil fuel industry that has funded the climate change denial movement and worked to undermine efforts in the United States and worldwide to fight global warming. Tackling the root causes of climate change means challenging the fundamental class interests of the transnational capitalist class, or TCC.

This TCC has imposed since the 1980s the neo-liberal program of trade liberalization, privatization, deregulation, and austerity for the working majority. Neo-liberalism has unleashed corporations to plunder the environment the world over. The urgent measures necessary to prevent a catastrophic overheating of the planet require major government intervention to reign in on the corporate free-for-all and to regulate the global economy – precisely the measures that would reverse neo-liberalism and place public restraint on unbridled TCC profit-making. The “inconvenient truth” is that climate justice and capitalist globalization are not compatible. It is time to talk about ecosocialism.

Moreover, neo-liberal capitalist globalization has resulted in a grotesque global inequality. The 1% now controls more wealth than half of humanity and 20% of the world population monopolizes 94% of the world’s wealth while the remaining 80% has to make do with just 6%. The majority of humanity does not have the income to consume all that the global economy churns out. Consequently, the TCC has turned to making wars and deploying new systems of mass social control repression, what I call militarized accumulation, as a way to throw firewood on the smoldering embers of a stagnant global economy. We are living in a global war economy. In addition, the TCC has engaged in mind-boggling levels of financial speculation and in the plunder of public budgets and social spending cutbacks to keep profits pouring into corporate coffers.

But none of this has done the trick: the global economy remains mired in stagnation. A new financial collapse is likely, almost inevitable. Meanwhile, the system has faced a crisis of legitimacy as people around the world search for a way out of displacement, economic decline and social decomposition.

Enter Trumpism. Trump’s economic program is to intensify neo-liberalism, especially privatization and deregulation. We can expect under the Trump regime an effort to further privatize what remains of a public sector, including schools, veterans affairs, and possibly social security, along with the drive to further transfer wealth from labor to capital through corporate tax cuts and austerity.

His proposal for massive investment in infrastructure is an effort to privatize public infrastructure and to build new infrastructure through steep corporate tax reductions and credits and public subsidies. He picked Ben Carson, who has opposed social safety net programs, public housing and fair housing programs, to head the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Expect attempts to privatize urban social and housing programs. Trump chose as education secretary Betsy DeVos, a champion of private school vouchers that undercut public school systems. Expect an escalation of the push to privatize education. Trump’s likely picks for Veterans affairs (Pete Hegseth is the leading candidate) will pursue the privation of veteran services.

Meanwhile, Trump is filling military posts – homeland security, defense, national security advisor – with politicized generals and retired military officers. Expect a hike in the military budget at the expense of social programs, new round of militarized accumulation worldwide, and an expanded police state at home and abroad to repress the social uprisings and political explosions that are already unfolding. There will be an increasing influence of the military in civilian affairs and the structures of political power. This fusion of military and civilian power is a telltale sign of 21st century fascism.

Trumpism appears to be an extreme right-wing program because it is. In the 21st century extreme right-wing means extreme global capitalism. The liberal variant of capitalist globalization – a “kindler, gentler” capitalist globalization through a liberal/multicultural discourse as distinct from neo-fascist discourse – cannot resolve the system’s crisis of legitimacy. If Trump’s economic program is neo-liberalism unleashed from any constraint, his political and ideological program involves populist promises that will be impossible to keep, a racist mobilization against scapegoats, and an expansion of the police state.

But the Obama administration has been far from a champion of climate justice or an opponent of the neo-liberal agenda. To the contrary, it has simply been a “kinder, gentler” agent of the fossil fuel industry and at the same time has rigorously promoted neo-liberalism, capitalist globalization, war and militarization around the world. Indeed, there is a near-straight line from Obama to Trump. It was the Obama government that more fully opened the Pandora’s box of Trumpism and 21st century fascism.

Source:


Read also:


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mystery solved: here's why the Western mainstream media suddenly 'discovered' the war in Yemen

globinfo freexchange
Why it took so long for the Western mainstream media to 'discover' the war in Yemen and the war crimes committed by the Saudi coalition in full co-operation with the US?
One might think that the humanitarian disaster there - caused also by the blockade of goods for the relief of the civilians - has become so obvious, condemned multiple times by the UN, that the media finally forced to speak about it.
In previous article we attempted to explain the 'unexplained phenomenon' and the fact that CNN surprisingly returned to the issue to openly condemn the US support to the Saudi coalition atrocities against civilians in Yemen.
Yet, despite that the Saudi regimes have been, traditionally, the best allies of the Western neocolonialists, this time, the US had serious reasons to overthrow the Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS). And, surprisingly enough, at the center of this underground conflict lies an attempt by the US to privatize Aramco, Saudi Arab…

How neoliberalism manufactured consent to secure its unlimited power

From David Harvey's A Brief History of Neoliberalism
Part 3 - The corporate-backed institutions behind the rapid and artificial ideological transformation of the American society in favor of neoliberalism
In the US case I begin with a confidential memo sent by Lewis Powell to the US Chamber of Commerce in August 1971. Powell, about to be elevated to the Supreme Court by Richard Nixon, argued that criticism of and opposition to the US free enterprise system had gone too far and that ‘the time had come –– indeed it is long overdue –– for the wisdom, ingenuity and resources of American business to be marshalled against those who would destroy it’. Powell argued that individual action was insufficient. ‘Strength’, he wrote, ‘lies in organization, in careful long-range planning and implementation, in consistency of action over an indefinite period of years, in the scale of financing available only through joint effort, and in the political power available only through united action and n…

Recent US elections confirmed that progressives will have to fight two monsters at once: Donald Trump and corporate Democrats

failed evolution
Nancy Pelosi's speech after Democrats took the House in recent US elections was not just a huge disappointment. Many progressives became furious about her empty speech, which was full of the most obsolete political generalities and cliches.
But it was not just that Pelosi didn't want to committ that Democrats will fight for specific issues - in favor of the vast majority of Americans - that returned in the political debate by Bernie Sanders and the progressive movement.
She actually 'gave the finger' to the progressives straight and clear.
If you don't believe it, just check her own words: “... we will strive for bipartisanship. [...] we have a bipartisan marketplace of ideas that makes our democracy strong ...
Translation: ‘We will do business as usual. The bipartisan dictatorship will remain strong and under the control of the plutocratic elite. Nothing will change, don't bother.
That's all you need to know.
Here is another evidence that the c…

CIA had an agent at a newspaper in every world capital at least since 1977

Joel Whitney is a co-founder of the magazine Guernica, a magazine of global arts and politics, and has written for many publications, including the New York Times and Wall Street Journal. His book Finks: How the C.I.A. Tricked the World's Best Writers describes how the CIA contributed funds to numerous respected magazines during the Cold War, including the Paris Review, to subtly promote anti-communist views. In their conversation, Whitney tells Robert Scheer about the ties the CIA’s Congress for Cultural Freedom had with literary magazines. He talks about the CIA's attempt during the Cold War to have at least one agent in every major news organization in order to get stories killed if they were too critical or get them to run if they were favorable to the agency. And they discuss the overstatement of the immediate risks and dangers of communist regimes during the Cold War, which, initially, led many people to support the Vietnam War.
globinfo freexchange
James Jesus Angleton wa…

In 1961, US experts knew that the Soviets had only four ICBMs

globinfo freexchange
In a discussion with Paul Jay of the Real News, Daniel Ellsberg revealed that the US discovered - through a top-secret operation -that the USSR had only four(!) ICBMs back in 1961. This meant that the Soviets were very far from becoming a serious threat for the West. However, the false picture of the 'Soviet threat' remained powerful in order to permit the US to justify its frenzy nuclear armament race.
Ellsberg explains:
The estimate of 40 to 60 [Soviet intercontinental ballistic missiles] - which was pretty much in 1962 at the time of the missile crisis based on a lot of satellite photography - was much lower than was estimated earlier, from ‘58, ‘59, ‘60.
The Air Force had a higher estimate. Even the CIA official estimate in 1961 was well over 100. The State Department estimated like 160. The Air Force was much higher than that. And in August of 1961, the then commander of Strategic Air Command, Thomas Power, believed that there were then 1000 Soviet ICBMs…

Trump proves he is completely clueless on what's the real reason behind the mass layoffs epidemic in big businesses and how to deal with it

globinfo freexchange
Donald Trump's response to recent General Motors' decision to close plants and slash jobs, proves that he is completely clueless on what's the real reason behind the mass layoffs epidemic in US big businesses and how to deal with it.
The media circulated what Trump thinks to do about it, including threats against GM to impose auto tariffs, or, his most beloved action: penalties on foreign cars.
Yet, perhaps the most hilarious part in the whole story, is that one of the key frontline tools of the global neoliberal capital immediately published an 'in your face' article to make Trump realize that he is completely powerless too, against the forces of the markets. Here are some interesting parts:
... market forces are tough to beat, even if you’re president. Trump captured the White House thanks in large part to the story he told -- that he could reverse America’s industrial decline. He promised to bring back manufacturing and fossil-fuel j…

Another US slow motion coup in Latin America: astonishing details on how the neoliberal-fascist complex destroyed Leftist leaders in Brazil and brought Jair Bolsonaro to power

globinfo freexchange
Greg Wilpert of the RealNews, spoke with Brian Mier, editor for the website Brasil Wire, about the recent developments after right-wing extremist Jair Bolsonaro won the presidential election in Brazil.
Mier revealed astonishing details on how the neoliberal-fascist complex in Brazil (fully backed by the US), undermined and destroyed the most popular leaders of the Workers' Party (PT), Lula da Silva, Dilma Rousseff and even Fernando Haddad, in order to bring Jair Bolsonaro to power.
The purpose of this slow motion coup was what has been always for the US empire, especially in Latin America: to secure and broaden the absolute domination of the US and the Western corporate monopolies and destroy any Leftist resistance against the neoliberal status quo.
As Mier explained:
On the eve of the Supreme Court decision - which ruled on whether Lula should be imprisoned or not, exceptionally, in a moment when his appeals were still going on, contrary to hundreds of other poli…

How neoliberalism manufactured consent to secure its unlimited power

From David Harvey's A Brief History of Neoliberalism
Part 4 - Neoliberalism's second big experiment after Chile: the financial coup by the banking mafia to take over New York
One line of response to the double crisis of capital accumulation and class power arose in the trenches of the urban struggles of the 1970s. The New York City fiscal crisis was an iconic case. Capitalist restructuring and deindustrialization had for several years been eroding the economic base of the city, and rapid suburbanization had left much of the central city impoverished. The result was explosive social unrest on the part of marginalized populations during the 1960s, defining what came to be known as ‘the urban crisis’ (similar problems emerged in many US cities).
The expansion of public employment and public provision –– facilitated in part by generous federal funding –– was seen as the solution. But, faced with fiscal difficulties, President Nixon simply declared the urban crisis over in the early 1…

Exploiting Khashoggi's assassination: the neoliberal predators hang over Saudi Arabia

globinfo freexchange
A month ago we gathered some information to explain the sudden 180 degrees hostile turn by the Western neoliberal status quo against the current Saudi regime.
We discovered that the US corporate dictatorship and the Wall Street mafia heavily invested on the rapid neoliberalization of the Saudi Arabian economy, with the privatization of the state-owned oil company Aramco at the heart of this plan. Suddenly, Mohammed bin Salman decided to step back from the deal.
It would be worth to note that Aramco was standing at the top of the global list of the largest oil and gas companies for 2017 with a revenue of 465.49 billion US dollars.
It seems that the neoliberal regime didn't abort its plans concerning Saudi Arabia and silently seeks to "replace" bin Salman with a more faithful puppet, exploiting, of course, the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi.
Digging a little bit more, we found plenty of evidence in the Western mainstream media, in recent years, showing …

How neoliberalism manufactured consent to secure its unlimited power

From David Harvey's A Brief History of Neoliberalism
Part 1 - Construction of political consent across a sufficiently large spectrum of the population
How was neoliberalization accomplished, and by whom? The answer in countries such as Chile and Argentina in the 1970s was as simple as it was swift, brutal, and sure: a military coup backed by the traditional upper classes (as well as by the US government), followed by the fierce repression of all solidarities created within the labour and urban social movements which had so threatened their power.
But the neoliberal revolution usually attributed to Thatcher and Reagan after 1979 had to be accomplished by democratic means. For a shift of this magnitude to occur required the prior construction of political consent across a sufficiently large spectrum of the population to win elections. What Gramsci calls ‘common sense’ (defined as ‘the sense held in common’) typically grounds consent.
Common sense is constructed out of long-standing pr…