Skip to main content

Dear Americans: the Democratic Party is purely neoliberal, NOT Left!

by system failure

In the wake of Trump's unexpected victory, for many, there is an ongoing battle in various discussions about the ideological orientation of the Democratic Party in the United States. A part of those who attack the establishment inside the Democrats and rather belong to the group of Far-Right white Trump voters, like to point the Democratic Party as part of the Left in the United States, or even, as the key representative of the Left in the country.

The first response to this simplified perception, is that the real Left in the US was never existed in reality. During approximately the last 100 years, Franklin D. Roosevelt was probably the one who applied only a flavor of Leftist policies, by implementing Keynesian economics through government investment and spending, to create jobs for the Americans who had been destroyed from the 1929 financial crisis of casino capitalism.

In fact, the then corporate propaganda, was accusing him even as 'Communist', for shifting economy towards the state control, because it was losing its privileged position. A quote from a Roosevelt's speech is characteristic: “A few timid people, who fear progress, will try to give you new and strange names for what we are doing. Sometimes they will call it "Fascism," sometimes "Communism," sometimes "Regimentation," sometimes "Socialism." But, in so doing, they are trying to make very complex and theoretical something that is really very simple and very practical.

The absolute domination of financialized capitalism from the early 70s until today, has basically reinforced further the US bipartisan authoritarianism, as both the Democratic and the Republican parties have been taken over by the neoliberal doctrine. This can be seen clearly, especially after Clinton administration, where not only the imperial wars continued, as always in the past, but the financialization had penetrated in everyday life, creating fake prosperity and financial bubbles, which later led to the new 2008 big meltdown.

Both the Republicans and the Democrats have chosen to rescue the banking parasites at the expense of the taxpayers, preserving a deeply unequal system. At the same time, the complex of the deep state, the corporate lobbyists and the neocons, continued to influence the Congress concerning every key decision that had to be made.

As a result, we had more destructive wars, more terror attacks, more suppression measures, more job losses, more destruction of the welfare state, more refugees, more poverty, more inequality. At the same time, we had, of course, more profits for the banks, more profits for the arms and the oil industry, more power to the hands of the lobbyists.

Therefore, in order to maintain this 'business as usual' status, the establishment had to maintain some ideological differences on the surface, in order to find a way to divide voters ideologically and keep them tied with the US bipartisanism, to make sure that would never lose control.

Hillary Clinton sold a lot of fake progressiveness by supporting the immigrants, the homosexuals, the women of course, in her desperate attempt to exhibit a fundamental difference against Donald Trump. She failed because she was the one who voted for destructive wars. She was the one who was taking money from the lobbyists. She was the one who avoided to mention any specific, substantial measure for the poor and against the financial elites. She started saying something about these issues only when she saw the Bernie Sanders threat coming.

But the Republicans too, because of their traditional, sacred belief in the free market and the corporatism, as every Right-Wing party in the Western financialized economies, are actually closer to the neoliberal doctrine. But under these circumstances, it was impossible to elect a "politically correct" candidate. They invented Donald Trump to manipulate the displeased masses with his extreme rhetoric. And he did it. He appears to be only a reserve of the establishment, in order to maintain its sovereignty.

So finally, you can understand that what the establishment fears truly, is the authentic Leftists like Bernie Sanders or Jill Stein. We witnessed it clearly in the case of Sanders.

When the media pundits saw with terror that Bernie was beating Trump by a far more significant percentage than Hillary, they knew that they had to get rid of him. It was much easier to do it in the primaries with the unfair and undemocratic system of superdelegates and the inside war from DNC. They wouldn't risk to see Bernie at the finals with Trump, where the whole world would watch closely. Indeed, WikiLeaks revealed that the DNC establishment had launched a dirty war against Bernie, but also that, some lobbyists wanted to get rid of him too.

Therefore, dear Americans, the Democratic Party as well as the Republican, are purely neoliberal. The Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton have nothing to do with the Left!



  1. I like this article, and I agree about Donald Trump probably being a stealth stalking horse, but I must point out that your idea of the free market is wrong if you lump it in with corporatism and neo-liberalism or neo-conservatism. There are 2 kinds of markets, free markets, and all others are rigged markets. The general public cannot rig the market in its favor, the whole purpose of the function of a free market is that it serves the needs of the whole community without bias or prejudice. When a market is rigged it can only be rigged to favor some narrow special interest. That's why leftist attempts to rig the market to help the "People" never work and cannot work. Instead of trying to rig the market, why not let the free market do its job of creating wealth and then, afterwards, make provisions for helping the people that would otherwise suffer unduly as a result. Instead of trying to rig the game to make it come out more evenly, which is an economic lie, why not provide consolation prizes, as it were, so to speak, for those who most severely lose the game? I think that's what some people had in mind for what became the "welfare state" to accomplish, but the situation regarding free markets and welfare systems has not been well enough understood to find the right balance, yet.

  2. Regarding the financial implications I suggest this commentary:


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Donald Trump: the last symptom of a system that is about to collapse

globinfo freexchange
In another interesting interview with Chris Hedges, Richard Wolff explains why the Trump presidency is the last resort of a system that is about to collapse:
Finally, if everybody tries to save themselves (protection), we have a historical example: after the Great Depression that happened in Europe. And most people believe that it was a large part of what led to WWII after WWI, rather than a much saner collective effort. But capitalism doesn't go for collective efforts, it tends to destroy itself by its own mechanisms.
There has to be a movement from below. Otherwise, there is no counter force that can take us in another direction.
So, absent that counter force we are going to see this system spinning out of control and destroying itself in the very way its critics have for so long foreseen it well might.
When Trump announced his big tariffs on China, we saw the stock market dropped 700 points in a day. That's a sign of the anxiety, the danger, even in the min…

Austria has just returned to the Middle Ages

The Austrian government confirmed that the far-right is an emergency reserve of neoliberalism
globinfo freexchange
Haven't you yet convinced that the nationalists and the far-right are the most faithful dogs of the big capital? Then, look at what just happened in Austria. In the end, despite the mass protests in Vienna, Austrian employers will be able to introduce 12-hour working day without increasing wages. The relevant law adopted by the Parliament of the country, reports on Friday, July 6.

What's the first thing that Emmanuel Macron did after his election in France? He rushed to complete what Francois Hollande - the other puppet of the neoliberal establishment - had started: destroy trade unions, completely deregulate the labor market.
Yet, the media in France were promoting him as a 'progressive' (what a joke) who will stop the far-right threat.
In reality, big capital’s reserve, Marine Le Pen, is waiting in the 'bench', ready to take action any moment, now tha…

The idiotic circus of terror leads us to the final collapse

There is a familiar checklist for extinction and we are ticking off every item of it. The idiots know only one word: more. They are unencumbered by common sense. They hoard wealth and resources until workers cannot make a living and the infrastructure collapses. They live in privileged compounds where they eat chocolate cake and order missile strikes. They see the state as a projection of their own vanity.

failed evolution
The idiots seen in the decay the chance of personal advancement in profit, takeover in the final days of crumbling civilizations.

Idiot generals wage endless unwinnable wars that bankrupt the nation.
Idiot economists call for reducing taxes for the rich and cutting social service programs for the poor. And project economic growth on the basis of myth.
Idiot industrialists poison the water, the soil and the air. Slash jobs and depress wages.
Idiot bankers gamble on self-created financial bubbles and impose crippling debt peonage on the citizens.
Idiot journalists and …

The vicious circle of modern slavery

globinfo freexchange
It sounds unbelievable, but in one of supposedly the most advanced European nations, the government plans to allow the working day to be extended to 12 hours!
We are talking about Austria, where tens of thousands of people in Vienna packed the streets on Saturday to voice their opposition to loosening labor laws to allow for a 12-hour workday and subsequent 60-hour workweek. Police in Vienna said some 80,000 people took part, while the trade unions that organized the protest said some 100,000 people attended.
What can someone say about this unimaginably absurd decision?
In an age of all this advanced technology, with AI and hyper-automation, people should work less hours, enjoying all the benefits and extra free time for their families and themselves. Yet, in the homeland of Austrian economics that led us to brutal neoliberalism, it seems that the elites push things to the opposite direction. Why? Is it just because human labor can't compete the machines?
Think ab…

Bernie's revolution starts to wipe out the establishment with a huge political earthquake!

globinfo freexchange
It happened! A 28-year-old super-progressive beat the personification of the establishment in the Democratic primary! Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez won the Democratic primary in New York's 14th congressional district, defeating the establishment baron, Joe Crowley. This has been described by many, rightfully, as the biggest upset victory in the 2018 midterm election season.
What are the origins of this amazing, unprecedented result in the US political process?
We can find them in the 2016 Democratic primaries. Back then, Bernie Sanders put the foundations of a truly progressive movement that could beat the neoliberal establishment. We wrote then that Bernie speaks straightly about things buried by the establishment, as if they were absent. Wall Street corruption, growing inequality, corporate funding of politicians by lobbies. He says that he will break the big banks. He will provide free health and education for all the American people. Because of Sanders, Hillary w…

Corporate media pundits depict establishment's evident panic in front of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's huge victory

globinfo freexchange
Shortly after recent political earthquake with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's huge victory, the establishment apparatus started to react as expected.
TYT immediately responded by identifying the common narratives used by the corporate media pundits in the following video:

In this video you can track at least two kinds of typical 'arguments' provided by the neoliberal ideological framework. We wrote several times in this blog about such arguments that their carriers present them as being perfectly rational using 'logical leaps', while in reality, they are deeply irrational.
In the first argument, Steve Schmidt labels progressivism as 'dishonest', simply because it fights for free education, free healthcare, etc. The basic 'argument' is the usual: ordinary people can't have such things because of the enormous debt. Of course, the logical leap here is the fact that the neoliberal pundits always avoid to refer to the billions in bailout…

Key parts of the Matrix: the faithful little soldiers of the mainstream media

globinfo freexchange
Ludivine Bénard describes almost perfectly a key part of the Matrix of our times:
Journalistic titles hire journalists whose social background – socially, culturally, educationally and morally – fits perfectly with what the current capitalist order asks for.
People working in media are mostly middle-class types with the same interests, favouring consumerism, hedonism, libertarian individualism and unconditional Europeanism from Brussels. And they're all subject to this form of political illiteracy – they reduce reporting on politics to reporting on political personalities. The journalists and pollsters in the press turn political life into a theatrical stage, where personalities just endlessly talk and debate.
All that talk drowns out any serious criticism of the system.
The French people have been indoctrinated that way for decades – we've had more than 30 years of a certain consensus between the centrist powers of the conservative right of Les Républicains…

The 'anti-establishment' Trump admits he is more elite than the elite!

globinfo freexchange
He said it!
From the first moment in this blog, even before Trump's election, we repeatedly said that Donnie is only a reserve of the establishment.
Finally, he essentially admitted that he is more elite than the elite! Or, more establishment than the establishment if you like. During a campaign rally in Duluth, Minnesota, Trump said "Why are they elite? I have a much better apartment than they do. I'm smarter than they are. I’m richer than they are. I became president and they didn't."
Kyle Kulinski is right. Donald Trump wants to be fully integrated in the Establishment Inc. He wants to be loved by the elites, join them. He sends signals to them, saying 'I did what you want, why don't you play with me?'.
The message to the American citizens is this: do not trust the orange clown. In case that will grab your vote for a second term, he will do whatever the establishment wants, and more. Meaning, more tax-cuts for the rich, more for-pro…

The real E CORPs seek complete control of global food supply

Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world
globinfo freexchange
In the famous TV series, Mr. Robot, E Corp (which the central character, Elliot Alderson, perceives as Evil Corp), is an extremely powerful company that controls societies through consumer debt.
Yet, in the real world, a couple of mega multinationals could be proved even more ruthless. In another interesting report, James Corbett exposes the ultimate goal behind the merge of two of the biggest corporations in the food, medicine and agricultural sector. These are the real ECORPs:
What does a pharmaceutical giant have to gain from buying out and merging with an agrichemical giant, especially one that carries as much baggage as Monsanto?
If the connection between these corporate behemoths seems tenuous, then perhaps the key to understanding it is presented in that 1995 quote from former Monsanto CEO Robert Shapiro: “We’re talking…

Three years from the coup against Greece by the European Financial Dictatorship

globinfo freexchange
Three years passed (July 5, 2015) since the European Financial Dictatorship through the European Central Bank (ECB) and its head Mario Draghi, was forced to proceed in an open financial coup against Greece.
The start of current decade revealed the most ruthless face of a global neo-colonialism. From Syria and Libya to Europe and Latin America, the old colonial powers of the West tried to rebound against an oncoming rival bloc led by Russia and China, which starts to threaten their global domination.
Inside a multi-polar, complex terrain of geopolitical games, the big players start to abandon the old-fashioned, inefficient direct wars. They use today other, various methods like brutal proxy wars, economic wars, financial and constitutional coups, provocative operations, 'color revolutions', etc.
In this highly complex and unstable situation, when even traditional allies turn against each other as the global balances change rapidly, the forces unleashed are abs…