Skip to main content

Why most of the Panama Papers have been kept in the dark?

by Michalis Yianneskis

The impressive and gigantic revelations of Panama Papers had brought in the light activities of politicians, tycoons and businessmen from around the world. With the spotlight turned on such an important revelations, the fact that they do not include politicians from certain countries and most of the documents will not be published, rather overshadowed.

Two notable exceptions: Germany and US

The newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung, which was in the forefront of the revelations, initially said it would not make public all the documents and all the names mentioned. Also, the newspaper justified the paucity of revelations regarding Germany and the US, stating that there are no "traces" of political involvement of these two countries. Other organizations/newspapers which had a major role in the revelations, also made similar statements.

At the same time, it's a mystery how the number of the offshore companies that appear in Panama Papers is relatively small for the United States (3,072 companies compared to 9,670 from the UK, without the tax havens of the English Channel) and Germany (173, compared to 223 from Greece).

The obvious explanation for these observations is that no politician and relatively few entrepreneurs from these countries are related with offshore activities through Mossack Fonseca, the company at the center of the revelations. Yet, is there any other explanation apart from the obvious?

The way and the reasons of the revelations

The "deep throat" of the revelations contacted with Süddeutsche Zeitung in January 2015. Until the publication of Panama Papers, 14 months later, nearly 400 journalists from 80 countries analyzed a volume of data which was ten times larger than all previous big revelations (Wikileaks, Luxleaks, etc.). Therefore, naturally some questions come.

First, did the "deep throat" had motives for leaking the data other than just "publishing the crimes"? Second, how secret could remain the whole process from the US secret services which, as shown by the revelations of Edward Snowden, are watching almost everything? (Unless of course the secret services promoted the revelations). Two possible answers for the questions above have been published so far.

Putin's "finger"

Clifford Gaddy of Brookings Institution in the United States, supports that the source of the leaks is the Russian secret service RFM, which is totally controlled by Putin. As Gaddy points, despite that Putin's name is on the first pages of the newspapers, he is not related directly with the revelations. The amount of money involved with people from his environment is small compared to previous cases of corruption that have seen the light of publicity.

Gaddy argues that the main objective of the revelations are individuals and companies that are not included in Panama Papers. According to Gaddy, Putin sent a message to the Americans and other Western leaders that there are documents that can be published in the future. Namely, that if the Western leaders do not appear more cooperative in the relations with Russia, there will be leaks for their own financial irregularities too. Whether and to what extent Gaddy's theory is reasonable, remains unknown. Gaddy does not cite any evidence to support it.

Western interests "finger"

A different view expressed by Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan. Murray accused the government of Uzbekistan for human rights abuses, and then fired from the British diplomatic service. Today mainly involved with political activism.

Murray argues that the real agenda of Panama Papers revelations, is to cover the 1% of the West that controls the wealth. This view is based mainly on the methodology applied by the journalists and newspapers, and the funding by the organizations involved with the revelations.

The newspapers that have published the Panama Papers have admitted that they "filtered" the documents, focusing primarily on countries that violated various UN embargo. Moreover, they said that most of the material they have in their hands will remain secret. Murray notes that newspapers want to avoid effects similar to those of previous revelations, such as when the Guardian was forced to destroy hard disks with the revelations of Snowden.

That is, Murray believes that newspapers avoid to confront the big interests of the West˙ restricted to publish only some "collateral damage" concerning the (former) prime minister of Iceland, the father of British Prime Minister Cameron, etc. The view of Murray cannot be confirmed without access to the files of the newspapers, but his arguments seem reasonable.

Follow the money

One way someone to identify potential perpetrators of the revelations and verifying the correctness of these views, is to examine their financing, the known «follow the money».

Who has financed Brookings, Gaddy's "speech stand"? The largest sponsors of the institute include the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the bank J.P. Morgan Chase, J.L. Thornton, former president of Goldman Sachs, magnate David Rubenstein, and, the government of Qatar.

Who is funding the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists that had a major role in the revelations? The Centre for Public Integrity US, which in turn is funded by the Open Society Foundation (Soros mogul), the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Family Fund and other "charitable" institutions. While at the bottom of the website of Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project which published the Panama Papers, the Open Society Foundation and USAID are listed as sponsors.

The USAID is infamous for hidden interventions in other countries to support US geopolitical agenda. A recent example was the attempt to destabilize the Cuban government in 2014. Therefore, the Wikileaks justifiably bell rang when they saw the involvement of USAID and similar organizations, and not because, as reported in various media, became "jealous" of the "competition" with the success leakage of Panama Papers.

Murray is probably right when he warns that we should not expect a "genuine" revelation of capitalism in the West, and that the dirty secrets of the Western corporations will remain unpublished. The Panama Papers have obviously offered significant revelations. However, as it was written by the writer Arthur Conan Doyle, "there is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact".

Translated from the original source:

Comments

  1. Just give us the data.
    They have done a piss poor job disseminating the data.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

US-backed counter-revolution coup against Cuba blatantly fails

globinfo freexchange   Since at least early 2018, the US imperialists were setting the stage for another coup against Cuba in the form of a "color revolution".  As reported back then:   The US State Department announced a new program called 'The Cuba Internet Task Force'. The Task Force will consist of the US government and non-governmental representatives to "promote the free and unregulated flow of information in Cuba". It is part of the National Security Presidential Memorandum of "strengthening the policy of the United States toward Cuba", that was issued by President Trump in June 2017.   This policy seeks "advancing Cuban human rights; encouraging the growth of a Cuban private sector independent of government control; enforcing final orders of removal against Cuban nationals in the United States". The US has sought to overthrow the Cuban government ever since the 1959 revolution. This is not the first time the US has attempted to

Chris Hedges on Assange, Donziger, & the US prison state

Redacted Tonight   Chris Hedges joins Lee Camp for a conversation around his latest book about teaching in American prisons. They also discuss corruption in the media and the U.S. System of Justice. The persecution of Julian Assange and Steven Donziger have garnered attention over the last few weeks for their egregious displays of judicial corruption in service of the world’s most powerful people. Hedges provides context for your outrage in their cases. He then reveals his experiences teaching prisoners in maximum security facilities and expresses support for incarcerated people who have chosen to protest their living conditions.

Alert: US imperialists prepare counter-revolution coup on November 15th to take over Cuba!

globinfo freexchange   On November 1st, Lee Camp appeared astonished by the fact that the State Department essentially announced a US-backed coup against Cuba in advance!  And not only that. The US imperialists revealed the specific method and the exact date of the counter-revolution coup! The method is the typical one that we've seen in various cases the last decade or so, which involves a type of "color revolution". The date: November 15th. On November 2nd, cadenagramonte.cu website gave the details and the key players of the operation.   On November 3rd, TeleSUR reported that:                                A Cuban government representative said that Cuba has probably been facing up the largest and most complex cultural warfare operation orchestrated by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), promoting a new type of counterrevolution. On Twitter, Cuba's Deputy Foreign Minister Anayansi Rodríguez posted a U.S. plan to bring Cuba's political system down, whic

Οι ολιγάρχες ετοιμάζουν το Plan B που είχαν στο συρτάρι: Συγκυβέρνηση ΝΔ-ΚΙΝΑΛ και επιστροφή της γαλαζοπράσινης λαίλαπας

globinfo freexchange   Το άκρως φιλοκυβερνητικό Βήμα , κομμάτι της συστημικής προπαγάνδας της εγχώριας ολιγαρχίας, έδωσε χθες το σύνθημα για το Plan B των ολιγαρχών που είχαν στο συρτάρι ως εναλλακτική, καθώς δεν χρειάστηκε να το θέσουν σε εφαρμογή, λόγω της αυτοδυναμίας που πέτυχε η Μητσοτακική δεξιά στις εκλογές του Ιουλίου του 2019.    Πρόκειται το σενάριο συγκυβέρνησης ΝΔ-ΚΙΝΑΛ.  Όπως είχαμε γράψει τον Ιούνιο του 19, η ΝΔ (με ή χωρίς δεκανίκια), έχει ως μοναδική αποστολή να συνεχίσει το "λαμπρό" της έργο από εκεί που το άφησε. Βέβαια, η "Αριστερή παρένθεση", που η Τρόικα εσωτερικού και εξωτερικού φρόντισε έτσι και αλλιώς να κουρελιάσει, κράτησε λίγο παραπάνω απ'ότι υπολόγισαν τα "μεγάλα αφεντικά". Τώρα, ήρθε η ώρα να ξεκουμπιστεί, διότι υπάρχει κίνδυνος να θυμηθεί τις Αριστερές της καταβολές και να καταστρέψει το "θεάρεστο" σχέδιο του νεοφιλελεύθερου ιερατείου. Απ'ότι φαίνεται, υπάρχουν πρόθυμα δεκανίκια, για παν ενδεχόμενο. Από τότ

Visionary realism: A green future beyond capitalism - Yanis Varoufakis, Ann Pettifor & Noam Chomsky

DiEM25   "There is no alternative", "it's the end of history" in the shadow of the 2008 crash, the environmental crisis and ongoing COVID19 pandemic, never has the hubris of these words been more striking. Nevertheless if we are in fact at the end of an era, what comes next? Join us in uncovering the exciting possibilities that the future can hold with public intellectual Noam Chomsky and economists Ann Pettifor and Yanis Varoufakis. 

The most important battle for Press Freedom in our time

If he is extradited and found guilty of publishing classified material it will set a legal precedent that will effectively end national security reporting.   by Chris Hedges  Part 1 For the past two days, I have been watching the extradition hearing for Julian Assange via video link from London. The United States is appealing a lower court ruling that denied the US request to extradite Assange not, unfortunately, because in the eyes of the court he is innocent of a crime, but because, as Judge Vanessa Baraitser in January concluded, Assange’s precarious psychological state would deteriorate given the “ harsh conditions ” of the inhumane US prison system, “ causing him to commit suicide .” The United States has charged Assange with 17 counts under the Espionage Act and one count of trying to hack into a government computer, charges that could see him imprisoned for 175 years. Assange, with long white hair, appeared on screen the first day from the video conference room in HM Prison Belm

Top 1% of US earners now hold more wealth than all of the middle class

by Alexandre Tanzi and Mike Dorning  After years of declines, America’s middle class now holds a smaller share of U.S. wealth than the top 1%. The middle 60% of U.S. households by income -- a measure economists often use as a definition of the middle class -- saw their combined assets drop to 26.6% of national wealth as of June, the lowest in Federal Reserve data going back three decades. For the first time, the super rich had a bigger share, at 27%. The data offer a window into the slow-motion erosion in the financial security of mid-tier earners that has fueled voters’ discontent in recent years. That continued through the Covid-19 pandemic, despite trillions of dollars in government relief .   Rise of the Super Rich   Middle-class Americans now hold less wealth than the top 1% by income.   While “middle class” has different meanings to different people, many economists use income to define the group. The 77.5 million families in the middle 60% make about $27,000 to $141,000 annually

Top media company demands reporters write pro-US/EU/Israel propaganda

The Grayzone   The major media company Axel Springer SE, which owns Politico, Business Insider , and top German newspapers, was exposed for forcing its employees to write pro-US/EU/Israel propaganda. It has also been accused of being funded by the CIA. 

US govt-backed social media companies meddle in Nicaragua's elections

The Grayzone   Remember Russiagate claims of "Kremlin meddling"? Well, the US government is blatantly interfering in Nicaragua's elections. Ben Norton and Max Blumenthal discuss how, mere days before Nicaragua's November 7 elections, Meta/Facebook/Instagram, Twitter, and Google/YouTube purged thousands of pro-Sandinista journalists, activists, and media outlets. Meanwhile, the US Congress voted for more crushing sanctions.   They address the gaping holes in Facebook's bogus report falsely claiming the Sandinistas it purged were " government-run troll accounts, " which was written by former Pentagon-funded NATO press officer Ben Nimmo, a symbol of how social media corporations have effectively merged with the US government. 

Assange appeal day 2: Extradition decision update

acTVism Munich   A report on the second day of the appeal hearing in the extradition proceedings of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. The defense rebutted claims by the US government arguing that the assurances provided can be revoked at any time and are thus unreliable. Additionally, the court heard evidence that US intelligence plotted to assassinate Assange. A decision on extradition will be delivered in the coming weeks.