Skip to main content

Why most of the Panama Papers have been kept in the dark?

by Michalis Yianneskis

The impressive and gigantic revelations of Panama Papers had brought in the light activities of politicians, tycoons and businessmen from around the world. With the spotlight turned on such an important revelations, the fact that they do not include politicians from certain countries and most of the documents will not be published, rather overshadowed.

Two notable exceptions: Germany and US

The newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung, which was in the forefront of the revelations, initially said it would not make public all the documents and all the names mentioned. Also, the newspaper justified the paucity of revelations regarding Germany and the US, stating that there are no "traces" of political involvement of these two countries. Other organizations/newspapers which had a major role in the revelations, also made similar statements.

At the same time, it's a mystery how the number of the offshore companies that appear in Panama Papers is relatively small for the United States (3,072 companies compared to 9,670 from the UK, without the tax havens of the English Channel) and Germany (173, compared to 223 from Greece).

The obvious explanation for these observations is that no politician and relatively few entrepreneurs from these countries are related with offshore activities through Mossack Fonseca, the company at the center of the revelations. Yet, is there any other explanation apart from the obvious?

The way and the reasons of the revelations

The "deep throat" of the revelations contacted with Süddeutsche Zeitung in January 2015. Until the publication of Panama Papers, 14 months later, nearly 400 journalists from 80 countries analyzed a volume of data which was ten times larger than all previous big revelations (Wikileaks, Luxleaks, etc.). Therefore, naturally some questions come.

First, did the "deep throat" had motives for leaking the data other than just "publishing the crimes"? Second, how secret could remain the whole process from the US secret services which, as shown by the revelations of Edward Snowden, are watching almost everything? (Unless of course the secret services promoted the revelations). Two possible answers for the questions above have been published so far.

Putin's "finger"

Clifford Gaddy of Brookings Institution in the United States, supports that the source of the leaks is the Russian secret service RFM, which is totally controlled by Putin. As Gaddy points, despite that Putin's name is on the first pages of the newspapers, he is not related directly with the revelations. The amount of money involved with people from his environment is small compared to previous cases of corruption that have seen the light of publicity.

Gaddy argues that the main objective of the revelations are individuals and companies that are not included in Panama Papers. According to Gaddy, Putin sent a message to the Americans and other Western leaders that there are documents that can be published in the future. Namely, that if the Western leaders do not appear more cooperative in the relations with Russia, there will be leaks for their own financial irregularities too. Whether and to what extent Gaddy's theory is reasonable, remains unknown. Gaddy does not cite any evidence to support it.

Western interests "finger"

A different view expressed by Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan. Murray accused the government of Uzbekistan for human rights abuses, and then fired from the British diplomatic service. Today mainly involved with political activism.

Murray argues that the real agenda of Panama Papers revelations, is to cover the 1% of the West that controls the wealth. This view is based mainly on the methodology applied by the journalists and newspapers, and the funding by the organizations involved with the revelations.

The newspapers that have published the Panama Papers have admitted that they "filtered" the documents, focusing primarily on countries that violated various UN embargo. Moreover, they said that most of the material they have in their hands will remain secret. Murray notes that newspapers want to avoid effects similar to those of previous revelations, such as when the Guardian was forced to destroy hard disks with the revelations of Snowden.

That is, Murray believes that newspapers avoid to confront the big interests of the West˙ restricted to publish only some "collateral damage" concerning the (former) prime minister of Iceland, the father of British Prime Minister Cameron, etc. The view of Murray cannot be confirmed without access to the files of the newspapers, but his arguments seem reasonable.

Follow the money

One way someone to identify potential perpetrators of the revelations and verifying the correctness of these views, is to examine their financing, the known «follow the money».

Who has financed Brookings, Gaddy's "speech stand"? The largest sponsors of the institute include the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the bank J.P. Morgan Chase, J.L. Thornton, former president of Goldman Sachs, magnate David Rubenstein, and, the government of Qatar.

Who is funding the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists that had a major role in the revelations? The Centre for Public Integrity US, which in turn is funded by the Open Society Foundation (Soros mogul), the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Family Fund and other "charitable" institutions. While at the bottom of the website of Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project which published the Panama Papers, the Open Society Foundation and USAID are listed as sponsors.

The USAID is infamous for hidden interventions in other countries to support US geopolitical agenda. A recent example was the attempt to destabilize the Cuban government in 2014. Therefore, the Wikileaks justifiably bell rang when they saw the involvement of USAID and similar organizations, and not because, as reported in various media, became "jealous" of the "competition" with the success leakage of Panama Papers.

Murray is probably right when he warns that we should not expect a "genuine" revelation of capitalism in the West, and that the dirty secrets of the Western corporations will remain unpublished. The Panama Papers have obviously offered significant revelations. However, as it was written by the writer Arthur Conan Doyle, "there is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact".

Translated from the original source:

Comments

  1. Just give us the data.
    They have done a piss poor job disseminating the data.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How neoliberalism manufactured consent to secure its unlimited power

From David Harvey's A Brief History of Neoliberalism
Part 3 - The corporate-backed institutions behind the rapid and artificial ideological transformation of the American society in favor of neoliberalism
In the US case I begin with a confidential memo sent by Lewis Powell to the US Chamber of Commerce in August 1971. Powell, about to be elevated to the Supreme Court by Richard Nixon, argued that criticism of and opposition to the US free enterprise system had gone too far and that ‘the time had come –– indeed it is long overdue –– for the wisdom, ingenuity and resources of American business to be marshalled against those who would destroy it’. Powell argued that individual action was insufficient. ‘Strength’, he wrote, ‘lies in organization, in careful long-range planning and implementation, in consistency of action over an indefinite period of years, in the scale of financing available only through joint effort, and in the political power available only through united action and n…

Mystery solved: here's why the Western mainstream media suddenly 'discovered' the war in Yemen

globinfo freexchange
Why it took so long for the Western mainstream media to 'discover' the war in Yemen and the war crimes committed by the Saudi coalition in full co-operation with the US?
One might think that the humanitarian disaster there - caused also by the blockade of goods for the relief of the civilians - has become so obvious, condemned multiple times by the UN, that the media finally forced to speak about it.
In previous article we attempted to explain the 'unexplained phenomenon' and the fact that CNN surprisingly returned to the issue to openly condemn the US support to the Saudi coalition atrocities against civilians in Yemen.
Yet, despite that the Saudi regimes have been, traditionally, the best allies of the Western neocolonialists, this time, the US had serious reasons to overthrow the Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS). And, surprisingly enough, at the center of this underground conflict lies an attempt by the US to privatize Aramco, Saudi Arab…

CIA had an agent at a newspaper in every world capital at least since 1977

Joel Whitney is a co-founder of the magazine Guernica, a magazine of global arts and politics, and has written for many publications, including the New York Times and Wall Street Journal. His book Finks: How the C.I.A. Tricked the World's Best Writers describes how the CIA contributed funds to numerous respected magazines during the Cold War, including the Paris Review, to subtly promote anti-communist views. In their conversation, Whitney tells Robert Scheer about the ties the CIA’s Congress for Cultural Freedom had with literary magazines. He talks about the CIA's attempt during the Cold War to have at least one agent in every major news organization in order to get stories killed if they were too critical or get them to run if they were favorable to the agency. And they discuss the overstatement of the immediate risks and dangers of communist regimes during the Cold War, which, initially, led many people to support the Vietnam War.
globinfo freexchange
James Jesus Angleton wa…

Trump proves he is completely clueless on what's the real reason behind the mass layoffs epidemic in big businesses and how to deal with it

globinfo freexchange
Donald Trump's response to recent General Motors' decision to close plants and slash jobs, proves that he is completely clueless on what's the real reason behind the mass layoffs epidemic in US big businesses and how to deal with it.
The media circulated what Trump thinks to do about it, including threats against GM to impose auto tariffs, or, his most beloved action: penalties on foreign cars.
Yet, perhaps the most hilarious part in the whole story, is that one of the key frontline tools of the global neoliberal capital immediately published an 'in your face' article to make Trump realize that he is completely powerless too, against the forces of the markets. Here are some interesting parts:
... market forces are tough to beat, even if you’re president. Trump captured the White House thanks in large part to the story he told -- that he could reverse America’s industrial decline. He promised to bring back manufacturing and fossil-fuel j…

In 1961, US experts knew that the Soviets had only four ICBMs

globinfo freexchange
In a discussion with Paul Jay of the Real News, Daniel Ellsberg revealed that the US discovered - through a top-secret operation -that the USSR had only four(!) ICBMs back in 1961. This meant that the Soviets were very far from becoming a serious threat for the West. However, the false picture of the 'Soviet threat' remained powerful in order to permit the US to justify its frenzy nuclear armament race.
Ellsberg explains:
The estimate of 40 to 60 [Soviet intercontinental ballistic missiles] - which was pretty much in 1962 at the time of the missile crisis based on a lot of satellite photography - was much lower than was estimated earlier, from ‘58, ‘59, ‘60.
The Air Force had a higher estimate. Even the CIA official estimate in 1961 was well over 100. The State Department estimated like 160. The Air Force was much higher than that. And in August of 1961, the then commander of Strategic Air Command, Thomas Power, believed that there were then 1000 Soviet ICBMs…

Another US slow motion coup in Latin America: astonishing details on how the neoliberal-fascist complex destroyed Leftist leaders in Brazil and brought Jair Bolsonaro to power

globinfo freexchange
Greg Wilpert of the RealNews, spoke with Brian Mier, editor for the website Brasil Wire, about the recent developments after right-wing extremist Jair Bolsonaro won the presidential election in Brazil.
Mier revealed astonishing details on how the neoliberal-fascist complex in Brazil (fully backed by the US), undermined and destroyed the most popular leaders of the Workers' Party (PT), Lula da Silva, Dilma Rousseff and even Fernando Haddad, in order to bring Jair Bolsonaro to power.
The purpose of this slow motion coup was what has been always for the US empire, especially in Latin America: to secure and broaden the absolute domination of the US and the Western corporate monopolies and destroy any Leftist resistance against the neoliberal status quo.
As Mier explained:
On the eve of the Supreme Court decision - which ruled on whether Lula should be imprisoned or not, exceptionally, in a moment when his appeals were still going on, contrary to hundreds of other poli…

How neoliberalism manufactured consent to secure its unlimited power

From David Harvey's A Brief History of Neoliberalism
Part 4 - Neoliberalism's second big experiment after Chile: the financial coup by the banking mafia to take over New York
One line of response to the double crisis of capital accumulation and class power arose in the trenches of the urban struggles of the 1970s. The New York City fiscal crisis was an iconic case. Capitalist restructuring and deindustrialization had for several years been eroding the economic base of the city, and rapid suburbanization had left much of the central city impoverished. The result was explosive social unrest on the part of marginalized populations during the 1960s, defining what came to be known as ‘the urban crisis’ (similar problems emerged in many US cities).
The expansion of public employment and public provision –– facilitated in part by generous federal funding –– was seen as the solution. But, faced with fiscal difficulties, President Nixon simply declared the urban crisis over in the early 1…

Exploiting Khashoggi's assassination: the neoliberal predators hang over Saudi Arabia

globinfo freexchange
A month ago we gathered some information to explain the sudden 180 degrees hostile turn by the Western neoliberal status quo against the current Saudi regime.
We discovered that the US corporate dictatorship and the Wall Street mafia heavily invested on the rapid neoliberalization of the Saudi Arabian economy, with the privatization of the state-owned oil company Aramco at the heart of this plan. Suddenly, Mohammed bin Salman decided to step back from the deal.
It would be worth to note that Aramco was standing at the top of the global list of the largest oil and gas companies for 2017 with a revenue of 465.49 billion US dollars.
It seems that the neoliberal regime didn't abort its plans concerning Saudi Arabia and silently seeks to "replace" bin Salman with a more faithful puppet, exploiting, of course, the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi.
Digging a little bit more, we found plenty of evidence in the Western mainstream media, in recent years, showing …

How the corporate elite started to eliminate the Left and the power of the US working class right after the end of WWII

globinfo freexchange
Richard Wolff brilliantly explains the economics behind the great US anti-leftist purge (McCarthyism) after 1945:
At the end of WWII - late 1940s into the 50s - something remarkable happened politically in the United States. And it was in many ways surprising. Suddenly, a group of people in the United States who had been celebrated as heroes, became instead - almost overnight – demons. From being leaders they became traitors.
Communists - members of the American Communist Party, Socialists - members of the two socialist parties at that time, and active leaders of the labor movement - the big organizing drives of the CIO in the 1930s and 40s, had brought millions of Americans who had never been in unions before, into the unions. They joined the unions because they thought it would be a safe way to make it through the Great Depression of the 1930s. At least safer than not being in a union.
And together, the Communists, the Socialists and the Unionists, really struggled …

The Guardian in the frontline of the establishment media that have declared a dirty and ruthless war against Julian Assange, WikiLeaks and real journalism

globinfo freexchange
The Guardian has stepped up its contemptible role as one of the main media conduits for the persecution of Julian Assange, publishing unsubstantiated and sensationalist allegations that the WikiLeaks publisher met with American political lobbyist, Paul Manafort.
One of the two authors of the Guardian article was, predictably, Luke Harding. Harding has penned a stream of material aimed at undermining support for Assange and WikiLeaks and attempting to justify the efforts of the US government to prosecute him for espionage or conspiracy. Assange aptly described an error-filled 2014 book written by Harding about whistleblower Edward Snowden and WikiLeaks as a “hack job in the purest sense of the word.
The allegation that Assange met with Manafort is another desperate effort to implicate WikiLeaks in the lurid claims of the Democratic Party, US intelligence agencies and much of the media that the Russian government “interfered” in the 2016 US presidential election to pr…