Skip to main content

How will they try to crush Bernie?

As Bernie Sanders frequently refers to Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) during his speeches, it would be worth to examine a few things on how the corporate establishment tried to fight back, when Roosevelt took the presidency. How the current establishment will try to crush Bernie in case he get elected?

globinfo freexchange

The mouthpieces of the US establishment must be feeling now quite nervous, seeing Bernie Sanders coming literally from nowhere to take the presidency. One can identify a growing embarrassment and confusion by the mainstream media, which shows that they don't know what to do to break the stormily rising popularity of Bernie Sanders within the U.S. electorate. Many poor journalists probably receive huge pressure by the media hierarchy all over the top, to do whatever they can, to present Sanders as a non-reliable candidate for the US presidency.

As already mentioned in previous article, the powerful establishment in the US will do whatever it takes to force Sanders to comply with the "business as usual" agenda, and force him to withdraw his promises for a real change towards the benefit of the majority. But Bernie shows that he will not be an easy target. With the wide and constant support of the American people, he has a good chance to win the battle and bring a real change.

As Bernie frequently refers to Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) during his speeches, it would be worth to examine a few things on how the corporate establishment tried to fight back, when Roosevelt took the presidency. Some interesting and useful information can be found in the first part of the exceptional documentary The Century of the Self by Adam Curtis.

As Curtis describes, Freud's nerphew, Edward Bernays, was the first person to take Freud's ideas about human beings and use them to manipulate the masses. He showed American corporations for the first time, how they could make people want things they didn't need by linking mass produced goods to their unconscious desires. Out of this would come a new political idea of how to control the masses. By satisfying people's inner selfish desires one made them happy and thus docile. It was the start of the all-consuming self which has come to dominate our world today.

Roosevelt believed it was possible to explain his policies to ordinary Americans and to take into account their opinions. To do this, he was helped by the new ideas of an American social scientist called George Gallup.

Gallup and Fortune Magazines analyst Elmo Roper, rejected Bernays' view that human beings were at the mercy of unconscious forces and so needed to be controlled. Their system of opinion polling was based on the idea that people could be trusted to know what they wanted. They argued that one could measure and predict the opinions and behavior of the public if one asked strictly factual questions and avoided manipulating their emotions.

What Roosevelt was doing was forging a new connection between the masses and politicians. No longer were they irrational consumers who were managed by sating their desires, instead, they were sensible citizens who could take part in the governing of the country. In 1936 Roosevelt stood for re-election. He promised further control over big business. To the corporations it was the beginning of a dictatorship. But Roosevelt was triumphantly re-elected.

Faced with this, business now decided to fight back, to regain power in America. At the heart of the battle would be Edward Bernays and the profession he had invented, public relations.

According to the Historian of Public Relations Stuart Ewen, following that election, business people started to get together and started to carry on discussions, primarily in private and they started talking to each other about the need to sort of carry on ideological warfare against the New Deal. And to sort of reassert the sort of connectedness between the idea of democracy on the one hand and the idea of privately owned business on the other. And so, under the umbrella of an organization which still exists, which is called The National Association of Manufacturers and whose membership included all of the major corporations of the United States, a campaign was launched explicitly designed to create emotional attachments between the public and big business; it was Bernays' techniques that had been used totally on a grand scale.

In response to the campaign, the government made films that warned of the unscrupulous manipulation of the press by big business. And the central villain was the new figure of the public relations man. The films also showed how the responsible citizens could monitor the press themselves. They could create a chart that analyzed the reporting for signs of hidden bias. But such earnest instruction was to be no match for the powerful imagination of Edward Bernays. He was about to help create a vision of the utopia that free market capitalism would build in America if it was unleashed.

In 1939, New York hosted the World's Fair. Edward Bernays was a central adviser. He insisted that the theme be the link between democracy and American business. At the heart of the fair was a giant white dome that Bernays named "Democra-City", and the central exhibit was a vast working model of America's future constructed by the General Motors corporation.

According to Ann Bernays, daughter of Edward Bernays, the World's Fair was an opportunity for him to keep the status quo. That is, capitalism in a democracy, democracy and capitalism and that marriage. He did that by manipulating people and getting them to think that you couldn't have real democracy in anything but a capitalist society which was capable of doing anything; of creating these wonderful highways, of making moving pictures inside everybody's house, of telephones that didn't need chords, of sleek roadsters. It was consumerist but at the same time you inferred that in a funny way that democracy and capitalism went together.

That system today is probably more complex and powerful. After nearly four decades of domination of the neoliberal doctrine in favor of the financial and corporate elites, people learned to worship the free market and hate the state.

However, the system also shows serious signs of saturation. After repeated financial disasters, free market has been proved a fairy tale. At the end, big banks are rescued by the state, while the powerful corporate lobbyists don't hesitate to mobilize the internal government channels in order even to start wars, to increase their profits. That's because the state has been completely occupied by these private lobbyists. Sanders wants to change that and retake the state for the benefit of the people.

Sanders today speaks about Socialism and social policies, but his popularity rises. Surely, this activates a warning alarm to the establishment, which seeks to maintain current status quo by any means. But today, public relations is not something new and unknown. What will the establishment do? Does it have another Bernays in its sleeve, who has already a new method to manipulate the masses? Or is it time for an open class war?

Read also:

Comments

  1. I like this assessment of Sanders as "the next Ronald Reagan". After the cringe, you will find it to be surprisingly on-the-mark.
    http://www.salon.com/2016/01/25/bernie_sanders_could_be_the_next_ronald_reagan/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a fundamental ideological difference between Sanders and Reagan. Actually the most fundamental of all: Reagan together with Thatcher were fanatic promoters of the neoliberal doctrine, while on the contrary, Sanders will seek to destroy it.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous29/1/16 18:13

    the rich elites also tried having a coup d'etat but picked the wrong General to run it - Smedley Butler - the american military would have followed him - he instead learned their plans and informed the administration - a believer in the constitution. interesting as how you don't read about this in American history books or how nobody went to jail for treason. Notice this article doesn't mention it. interesting to speculate on what would have happened if they had decided on Mac Arthur to lead the coup.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous29/1/16 18:17

    But don't worry. Even if Bernie wins the election and actually tries to deliver on real change - just remember what happened to last real reformers from the 60's that had real power.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is a joke, right? Some kind of fauxgressive paranoid fantasy. Sanders is as much a "socialist" as you are a crocodile. Seriously, if you fall for this Hope and Change BS again, you deserve exactly what you get.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sanders says he is a Socialist and his popularity rises. That's a huge progress for the US status quo under the neoliberal dictatorship that has demonized the term for decades. Whether he will prove it, depends on whether he manage to beat the establishment with the power of the American people.

      Delete
    2. I enjoyed the article, but I still worry that Sen. Sanders may be a
      deflection to energize the Democratic base and increase support
      from non-voters up to the time when he fails to gain the nomination
      and throws his substantial support to Mrs Clinton. Remember,
      Democrats are every bit as devious as Republicans. I learned that
      from Mr. Obama.

      Delete
    3. Regardless how many now Support Sanders, you can not count on many of them to support HC.

      Delete
    4. Yes Saddlequest, yes to Sanders, a cold day in hell to switch vote to HRC.
      Send to war crimes trial, yes, not for, not for my life.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous21/2/16 07:07

      Same here, NEVER

      Delete
  5. hipocampelofantocame, We can't exclude such a scenario, but I think it is highly improbable.

    First because Sanders in the debates don't hesitate to point his fundamental differences with Clinton (wall street funding, approval of the Iraq war).

    Second, because the dynamic he gains so far does not seem to be controllable and it doesn't looks like he want to control it in favor of Hillary.

    ReplyDelete
  6. GailStorm31/1/16 03:07

    Sanders' biggest problem isn't convincing voters. He comes across quite well in that regard. Instead, it is that they will pin something on him. The fix is too deep. That became obvious when Howard Dean stormed onto the scene. We got a video with highly doctored audio that had zero newsworthiness (does anyone believe Howard Dean is unhinged?) but the media gave it priority one attention. That's a fix inside the media. It was not remotely news. They'll find something with Sanders, most likely made-up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They'll have a hard row to hoe trying to sink Bernie. Look at the great job they're doing with Trump, a more feared candidate than even Bernie. It was a different day when they torpedoed Dean. Social media wasn't a factor like today and Bernie has too long and consistent a history to be sunk with a fabricated scandal. Now something more violent? That, I would have some concerns about, given how many nuts we have in the U.S..

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Διπλό στρατηγικό χτύπημα Τσίπρα κατά του καταρρέοντος Μητσοτακικού καθεστώτος

globinfo freexchange   Η είδηση έπεσε σαν βόμβα και παρόλο που η μιντιακή χούντα προσπάθησε (όπως πάντα) να υποβαθμίσει το γεγονός, η σούπα χάλασε από μια νέα ομάδα ποντικών που θέλησαν να πηδήξουν από το βυθιζόμενο Μητσοτακικό καράβι, πριν προλάβει να τους συμπαρασύρει η τρικυμία των εξελίξεων.   Αναφερόμαστε στην κατάρρευση της θεωρίας της σκευωρίας που έστησε το καθεστώς όσον αφορά το σκάνδαλο Novartis. Όπως ανέφερε το left.gr :                        H απόφαση «κόλαφος» του Δικαστικού Συμβουλίου για τα κακοστημένα κατηγορητήρια της κυβέρνησης Μητσοτάκη σε βάρος δημοσιογράφων που αποκάλυψαν το σκάνδαλο Novartis, εκθέτει πρώτον από όλους τον πρωθυπουργό ο οποίος είχε προεξοφλήσει από το βήμα της Βουλής την ενοχή τους με βαρείς χαρακτηρισμούς σε μια προσπάθεια να επηρεάσει τη Δικαιοσύνη. Πράγματι, η απόφαση αφήνει απόλυτα εκτεθειμένο τον Μητσοτάκη, που με θράσος από το βήμα της βουλής επιχείρησε με άθλιους χαρακτηρισμούς να στοχοποιήσει τους δημοσιογράφους (κυρίως Παπαδάκου και Βαξε

US imperialists sacrifice their European branch on the altar of their proxy war against Russia in Ukraine

globinfo freexchange   To arm the nazis and destroy Ukraine by dragging the country into a war with Russia wasn't enough for the ruthless US imperialists. They had to throw into the arena the entire Europe.    Yet, apart from a few - highly uncertain - successes so far, (coming from one of its most dirty proxy wars), the declining US empire discovers that it has to pay a huge price, just only to challenge the rise of its global rivals. It appears that, so far, the US imperialists are close to fulfill two of their key goals.    First, to lure Sweden and Finland into the NATO trap. A move that could be proved disastrous for two of the most prosperous and advanced European countries, whose achievements materialized (to a high degree) due to decades of neutrality.   Second, to force Russia into a long attrition war with Ukraine. Since already 2014, we wrote that the US imperialists wanted to challenge Putin in order to drag Russia in an endless attrition war in East Ukraine and this

Iran & Russia pledge to cut US dollar from global trade, strengthen China alliance

Multipolarista   Russian President Vladimir Putin visited Iran, signed a $40 billion energy cooperation agreement, and pledged to strengthen their economic and military alliance with China. Moscow and Tehran also called to drop the US dollar and use local currencies for trade.

Do it like the Fed: ECB raises key interest rates, creates money circulation loop for big banks and corporations

globinfo freexchange   Inside the storm of inflation, the European Central Bank suddenly thought that it would be a good idea to raise key interest rates for the first time in 11 years.  According to Deutsche Welle (DW) [emphasis added]:                       The ECB raised its negative benchmark deposit rate by 50 basis points from minus 0.5% to 0%, lifting the bank's deposit facility out of negative territory for the first time in eight years. The announcement came as a surprise as the bank had initially hinted that it would hike the rate by 25 basis points only .    It's remarkable that DW's analyst, Kristie Pladson, stated that " ... this is a historic decision they've taken now - first hike in eleven years, so, on that level, it's a little bit unclear exactly what effect it's going to have ... "   However, one thing ECB's move will surely affect, is money access for most of the Europeans. As Pladson says:                      ... what we do

Roger Waters destroys CNN host about Ukraine & Taiwan

The Jimmy Dore Show   Pink Floyd founding member and outspoken activist Roger Waters appeared on CNN recently and took advantage of the opportunity to school host Michael Smerconish on a range of topics, including the truth about the Ukraine War’s origins, Russia’s role in winning World War II against the Nazis and Taiwan’s relationship to China. 

Francis Fukuyama is right: Socialism is the only alternative to liberalism

In Liberalism and Its Discontents, Francis Fukuyama diagnoses the political and psychological malaise caused by capitalism. His analysis makes one thing clear: liberalism is incapable of addressing the social, economic, and ecological crises it faces.    by Samuel McIlhagga  Part 1 In a CNN interview, after another round of the US government’s sanctions on Russia, the following exchange took place between the show’s host and President Joe Biden’s economic adviser Brian Deese:               CNN: What do you say to those families that say, “Listen, we can’t afford to pay $4.85 a gallon for months if not years, this is just not sustainable”?         Deese: Well, what you heard from the president today was a clear articulation of the stakes. . . . This is about the future of the liberal world order and we have to stand firm. The events of the past two years, from the start of the global pandemic to the war in Ukraine, and now the global food shortage, are clear signs that liberalism, as a

Mexico’s President gives Joe Biden a big history lesson

Latin American nations are putting themselves on the front line for the sovereignty of certain countries, and are backing progressive processes in others   by Rodrigo Guillot   Part 1 Mexico’s President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) visited the United States on July 12 and offered five proposals to US President Joe Biden. These proposals are based on AMLO’s in-depth knowledge of Mexican history and his reading of the economic crisis in the United States, which seems to be losing its edge as a global leader. The first of the proposals that AMLO made was about Mexico allowing US consumers to fill gasoline tanks on the Mexican side of the border. By doing so, it is permitting the United States to ease its inflation crisis. AMLO offered to double the supply of gasoline in Mexico in his show of support to further ease the crisis. Second, AMLO said that Mexico would provide for more than 600 miles of gas pipelines along the US–Mexico border to help transport natural gas from Texas to Ar

The British establishment chose Boris Johnson as its weapon to defeat the Left

Boris Johnson’s disastrous time in office has spluttered to an ignominious conclusion. Many of those now deploring his record sided with Johnson when it really mattered because they wanted to block a left-wing government that could transform British society.   by Daniel Finn   Part 3 - Change UK Can Believe In Austin and Woodcock weren’t the only Labour MPs to break ranks under Corbyn. In February 2019, seven MPs resigned from the party and set up the Independent Group, which later became Change UK. There was a lot of talk in the commentariat about their potential to break the mold of British politics. Yet in the 2019 election, Change UK — now calling itself the Independent Group for Change — took just over ten thousand votes, marginally outpolling the Monster Raving Loony Party. All of the Labour defectors lost their seats — including those who defected a second time to the Liberal Democrats — apart from the ones who decided not to stand. They’ve since gone on to higher things: Chris

US debt held by the Federal Reserve surpassed 25% of GDP in 2021!

globinfo freexchange According to the economic database of St. Louis Federal Reserve (FRED), the US debt held by the Federal Reserve surpassed the unthinkable percentage of 25% of GDP (25.48%) for the first time in the third quarter of 2021! We observe that from the beginning of the related recorded data in 1970, the US debt held by the Federal Reserve remains almost flat and at much lower levels (~ 3.5%-5.5% of GDP). And this is the case even during the recession right after the 1973 oil crisis depicted by the shaded area in the graph.   Then, during the big financial meltdown of 2007-2008, we observe a shallow dive of the debt. After that period, we can see clearly that the US debt held by the Federal Reverse breaks one record after another, reaching unprecedented levels.   For the first time, the debt surpasses 10% of GDP in the second quarter of 2011 (10.41%), and in the first quarter of 2014 surpasses 15% of GDP (15.25%). Then, we have a dive in the third quarter of 2019 at 11.33

Ukraine: Ukrainian fighting tactics endanger civilians

Military bases set up in residential areas including schools and hospitals   Attacks launched from populated civilian areas       Such violations in no way justify Russia’s indiscriminate attacks, which have killed and injured countless civilians    Part 1   Ukrainian forces have put civilians in harm’s way by establishing bases and operating weapons systems in populated residential areas, including in schools and hospitals, as they repelled the Russian invasion that began in February, Amnesty International said today. Such tactics violate international humanitarian law and endanger civilians, as they turn civilian objects into military targets. The ensuing Russian strikes in populated areas have killed civilians and destroyed civilian infrastructure. “ We have documented a pattern of Ukrainian forces putting civilians at risk and violating the laws of war when they operate in populated areas, ” said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General. “ Being in a defensive pos