Skip to main content

Ένας παγκόσμιος "proxy" πόλεμος κατά της ελευθερίας έχει ξεκινήσει!

του system failure

Το προηγούμενο άρθρο "Proxy" πόλεμοι παντού, ο πλανήτης είναι ήδη στις φλόγες ... , ήταν μια απόπειρα πρώτης προσέγγισης γύρω από το πως θα πρέπει να οριστούν οι proxy πόλεμοι στις μέρες μας. Παρόλο που ορισμένοι επεσήμαναν ότι οι proxy πόλεμοι δεν είναι κάτι καινούργιο, η βασική πρόθεση ήταν να εξεταστεί κατά πόσο αυτοί τείνουν να κυριαρχήσουν και να γίνουν μια μόνιμη κατάσταση στα διάφορα πεδία συγκρούσεων σε όλο τον πλανήτη. Επιπλέον, φαίνεται ότι περνάμε σε ένα νέο είδος proxy πολέμων που διεξάγονται μέσα στα αστικά κέντρα.

Μετά τις επιθέσεις στους δίδυμους πύργους το 2001, η Δύση δοκιμάστηκε και από άλλες επιθέσεις σε ορισμένα μεγάλα αστικά κέντρα. Ενώ αυτές παρουσιάζονται συνήθως ως εκφράσεις του Ισλαμικού εξτρεμισμού, αυτό που συνήθως δεν τονίζεται, είναι το γεγονός ότι έχουν αλλάξει δραματικά το πλαίσιο των ατομικών δικαιωμάτων και ελευθεριών, προς την κατεύθυνση όλο και μεγαλύτερων περιορισμών. Περιορισμοί που συνεχίζουν να επιβάλλονται, ως αποτέλεσμα ενός δεύτερου κύματος τρομοκρατίας μετά την εμφάνιση του ISIS.

Ο πραγματικός στόχος και προέλευση των επιθέσεων του 2001, συχνά αμφισβητείται από αναρίθμητες θεωρίες που έκαναν την εμφάνισή τους από την αρχή αυτού του γεγονότος μέχρι και σήμερα. Τα συστημικά ΜΜΕ και πολλοί αναλυτές κατηγοριοποιούν αυτές τις θεωρίες ως θεωρίες συνωμοσίας. Ωστόσο, είναι αλήθεια ότι πολλά δεδομένα δεν ταιριάζουν στην επίσημη θέση που επέτρεψε στην κυβέρνηση Μπους και τα γεράκια της Ουάσιγκτον να εισβάλουν στο Ιράκ το 2003. Μια εισβολή που, όπως πρόσφατα παραδέχθηκε ο ίδιος ο Τόνι Μπλερ, οδήγησε στην εμφάνιση του τέρατος του ISIS.

Μια "σύμπτωση" που δεν αναφέρεται αρκετά, είναι ότι οι επιθέσεις στους δίδυμους πύργους έγιναν ακριβώς στην αυγή του 21ου αιώνα. Είτε κάποιος αποδέχεται την επίσημη θέση, είτε όχι, δύο σημαντικά στοιχεία σχετικά με αυτό το πολύ σημαντικό γεγονός είναι αναμφισβήτητα: πρώτον, ότι οι επιθέσεις ήταν πολύ καλά οργανωμένες, δεύτερον, ότι άλλαξαν το πρωτόκολλο ασφαλείας μέσα στις Δυτικές χώρες.

Η εμφάνιση του ISIS έκανε τα πράγματα χειρότερα. Αυτοί που σχεδιάζουν να προχωρήσουν σε μια γρήγορη επέκταση των μέτρων καταστολής και να στρατιωτικοποιήσουν τα Δυτικά αστικά κέντρα, έχουν τώρα ως δικαιολογία μια μόνιμη απειλή στη Μέση Ανατολή, ικανή να διεξάγει επιθέσεις αυτοκτονίας οπουδήποτε.

Αλλά τα πράγματα μπορούν να γίνουν ακόμα χειρότερα. Οι πρόσφατες επιθέσεις στο Παρίσι και κυρίως στο Σαν Μπερναρντίνο, ή ακόμα και αυτές το 2013 στο μαραθώνιο της Βοστόνης, αποκάλυψαν μια νέα κατάσταση: ότι οι επιθέσεις μπορούν να οργανωθούν χωρίς ιδιαίτερη καθοδήγηση και προετοιμασία από τους κεντρικούς πυρήνες μιας τρομοκρατικής οργάνωσης. Το γεγονός ότι το Σαν Μπερναρντίνο δεν περιλαμβάνεται στα μεγαλύτερα αστικά κέντρα που μπορούν να φιλοξενήσουν μεγάλες και οργανωμένες ομάδες εξτρεμιστών, είναι μια ισχυρή ένδειξη. Σύμφωνα με την Wikipedia, το Σαν Μπερναρντίνο είναι μόλις η 17η πόλη στην Καλιφόρνια και η 100η σε όλες τις ΗΠΑ.

Με λίγα λόγια, στο κεφάλαιο της τρομοκρατίας έχουμε δύο νέες συνθήκες: πρώτον, οι επιθέσεις δεν οργανώνονται απαραίτητα από έναν κεντρικό πυρήνα και δεύτερον, δεν συμβαίνουν απαραίτητα στα μεγαλύτερα αστικά κέντρα, που σημαίνει ότι μπορεί να συμβούν πρακτικά οπουδήποτε.

Τώρα που το κουτί της Πανδώρας άνοιξε για τα καλά, δεν υπάρχει λόγος για περισσότερη προσπάθεια και χρόνο προκειμένου να επέλθει το χάος. Δεν χρειάζεται κάποιος ιδιαίτερος σχεδιασμός. Η φτώχεια, τα ναρκωτικά, το μίσος και ο φανατισμός σ'αυτό τον φαύλο κύκλο, θα κάνουν τη δουλειά. Είναι η συνταγή των "θρησκευτικών" ηγετών με την οποία στέλνουν τα νεαρά θύματά τους στο θάνατο μέσα από επιθέσεις αυτοκτονίας, παράγοντας περισσότερα θύματα, μίσος και φανατισμό.

Η φτώχεια, τα ναρκωτικά, το μίσος και ο φανατισμός, θα ωθήσουν τους απόλυτα χειραγωγήσιμους φανατικούς να κάνουν επιθέσεις χωρίς ιδιαίτερη καθοδήγηση. Ακόμα και χώρες που δεν είναι κύριοι στόχοι, θα αναγκαστούν σύντομα να ακολουθήσουν μια κοινή πολιτική όσον αφορά τα μέτρα ασφαλείας. Οι άνθρωποι, όχι μόνο θα αποδεχθούν, αλλά και θα παρακαλάνε για περισσότερους περιορισμούς στο όνομα της προστασίας τους. Ένα κοινό πλαίσιο με περισσότερη καταστολή θα επιβληθεί σε ολόκληρη τη Δύση.

Σκεφθείτε το: αν δούμε τη συνολική εικόνα, εύκολα θα μπορούσαμε να καταλήξουμε στο συμπέρασμα, ότι έχουμε να κάνουμε με ένα νέο τύπο proxy πολέμου παγκόσμιας κλίμακας, ενάντια στα δικαιώματα και τις ελευθερίες μας!

Διαβάστε επίσης:



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How neoliberalism manufactured consent to secure its unlimited power

From David Harvey's A Brief History of Neoliberalism
Part 3 - The corporate-backed institutions behind the rapid and artificial ideological transformation of the American society in favor of neoliberalism
In the US case I begin with a confidential memo sent by Lewis Powell to the US Chamber of Commerce in August 1971. Powell, about to be elevated to the Supreme Court by Richard Nixon, argued that criticism of and opposition to the US free enterprise system had gone too far and that ‘the time had come –– indeed it is long overdue –– for the wisdom, ingenuity and resources of American business to be marshalled against those who would destroy it’. Powell argued that individual action was insufficient. ‘Strength’, he wrote, ‘lies in organization, in careful long-range planning and implementation, in consistency of action over an indefinite period of years, in the scale of financing available only through joint effort, and in the political power available only through united action and n…

Mystery solved: here's why the Western mainstream media suddenly 'discovered' the war in Yemen

globinfo freexchange
Why it took so long for the Western mainstream media to 'discover' the war in Yemen and the war crimes committed by the Saudi coalition in full co-operation with the US?
One might think that the humanitarian disaster there - caused also by the blockade of goods for the relief of the civilians - has become so obvious, condemned multiple times by the UN, that the media finally forced to speak about it.
In previous article we attempted to explain the 'unexplained phenomenon' and the fact that CNN surprisingly returned to the issue to openly condemn the US support to the Saudi coalition atrocities against civilians in Yemen.
Yet, despite that the Saudi regimes have been, traditionally, the best allies of the Western neocolonialists, this time, the US had serious reasons to overthrow the Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS). And, surprisingly enough, at the center of this underground conflict lies an attempt by the US to privatize Aramco, Saudi Arab…

CIA had an agent at a newspaper in every world capital at least since 1977

Joel Whitney is a co-founder of the magazine Guernica, a magazine of global arts and politics, and has written for many publications, including the New York Times and Wall Street Journal. His book Finks: How the C.I.A. Tricked the World's Best Writers describes how the CIA contributed funds to numerous respected magazines during the Cold War, including the Paris Review, to subtly promote anti-communist views. In their conversation, Whitney tells Robert Scheer about the ties the CIA’s Congress for Cultural Freedom had with literary magazines. He talks about the CIA's attempt during the Cold War to have at least one agent in every major news organization in order to get stories killed if they were too critical or get them to run if they were favorable to the agency. And they discuss the overstatement of the immediate risks and dangers of communist regimes during the Cold War, which, initially, led many people to support the Vietnam War.
globinfo freexchange
James Jesus Angleton wa…

How the corporate elite started to eliminate the Left and the power of the US working class right after the end of WWII

globinfo freexchange
Richard Wolff brilliantly explains the economics behind the great US anti-leftist purge (McCarthyism) after 1945:
At the end of WWII - late 1940s into the 50s - something remarkable happened politically in the United States. And it was in many ways surprising. Suddenly, a group of people in the United States who had been celebrated as heroes, became instead - almost overnight – demons. From being leaders they became traitors.
Communists - members of the American Communist Party, Socialists - members of the two socialist parties at that time, and active leaders of the labor movement - the big organizing drives of the CIO in the 1930s and 40s, had brought millions of Americans who had never been in unions before, into the unions. They joined the unions because they thought it would be a safe way to make it through the Great Depression of the 1930s. At least safer than not being in a union.
And together, the Communists, the Socialists and the Unionists, really struggled …

Trump proves he is completely clueless on what's the real reason behind the mass layoffs epidemic in big businesses and how to deal with it

globinfo freexchange
Donald Trump's response to recent General Motors' decision to close plants and slash jobs, proves that he is completely clueless on what's the real reason behind the mass layoffs epidemic in US big businesses and how to deal with it.
The media circulated what Trump thinks to do about it, including threats against GM to impose auto tariffs, or, his most beloved action: penalties on foreign cars.
Yet, perhaps the most hilarious part in the whole story, is that one of the key frontline tools of the global neoliberal capital immediately published an 'in your face' article to make Trump realize that he is completely powerless too, against the forces of the markets. Here are some interesting parts:
... market forces are tough to beat, even if you’re president. Trump captured the White House thanks in large part to the story he told -- that he could reverse America’s industrial decline. He promised to bring back manufacturing and fossil-fuel j…

In 1961, US experts knew that the Soviets had only four ICBMs

globinfo freexchange
In a discussion with Paul Jay of the Real News, Daniel Ellsberg revealed that the US discovered - through a top-secret operation -that the USSR had only four(!) ICBMs back in 1961. This meant that the Soviets were very far from becoming a serious threat for the West. However, the false picture of the 'Soviet threat' remained powerful in order to permit the US to justify its frenzy nuclear armament race.
Ellsberg explains:
The estimate of 40 to 60 [Soviet intercontinental ballistic missiles] - which was pretty much in 1962 at the time of the missile crisis based on a lot of satellite photography - was much lower than was estimated earlier, from ‘58, ‘59, ‘60.
The Air Force had a higher estimate. Even the CIA official estimate in 1961 was well over 100. The State Department estimated like 160. The Air Force was much higher than that. And in August of 1961, the then commander of Strategic Air Command, Thomas Power, believed that there were then 1000 Soviet ICBMs…

False flag operations set up by private companies

globinfo freexchange
Here is another sector soon to be occupied entirely by private companies: staging successful false flag operations and the subsequent suitable psyops.
As the World Socialist Web Site reported early this year:
Cambridge Analytica’s parent company is British-based SCL. Formerly Strategic Communication Laboratories, it is a private behavioural research and strategic communication company, founded in 1993 by Nigel Oakes.
As with Oakes, SCL’s board members include scions of the British ruling class, from former military officers and defence contractors to major Conservative Party donors.
SCL boasts of providing “data, analytics and strategy to governments and military organizations worldwide,” notably the British Ministry of Defence, the US State Department and NATO. It states that it has carried out “behavioural change programs” in more than 60 countries. One of its first contracts in 1999 was promoting Indonesian President Abdurrahma…

Exploiting Khashoggi's assassination: the neoliberal predators hang over Saudi Arabia

globinfo freexchange
A month ago we gathered some information to explain the sudden 180 degrees hostile turn by the Western neoliberal status quo against the current Saudi regime.
We discovered that the US corporate dictatorship and the Wall Street mafia heavily invested on the rapid neoliberalization of the Saudi Arabian economy, with the privatization of the state-owned oil company Aramco at the heart of this plan. Suddenly, Mohammed bin Salman decided to step back from the deal.
It would be worth to note that Aramco was standing at the top of the global list of the largest oil and gas companies for 2017 with a revenue of 465.49 billion US dollars.
It seems that the neoliberal regime didn't abort its plans concerning Saudi Arabia and silently seeks to "replace" bin Salman with a more faithful puppet, exploiting, of course, the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi.
Digging a little bit more, we found plenty of evidence in the Western mainstream media, in recent years, showing …

How neoliberalism manufactured consent to secure its unlimited power

From David Harvey's A Brief History of Neoliberalism
Part 4 - Neoliberalism's second big experiment after Chile: the financial coup by the banking mafia to take over New York
One line of response to the double crisis of capital accumulation and class power arose in the trenches of the urban struggles of the 1970s. The New York City fiscal crisis was an iconic case. Capitalist restructuring and deindustrialization had for several years been eroding the economic base of the city, and rapid suburbanization had left much of the central city impoverished. The result was explosive social unrest on the part of marginalized populations during the 1960s, defining what came to be known as ‘the urban crisis’ (similar problems emerged in many US cities).
The expansion of public employment and public provision –– facilitated in part by generous federal funding –– was seen as the solution. But, faced with fiscal difficulties, President Nixon simply declared the urban crisis over in the early 1…

The Guardian in the frontline of the establishment media that have declared a dirty and ruthless war against Julian Assange, WikiLeaks and real journalism

globinfo freexchange
The Guardian has stepped up its contemptible role as one of the main media conduits for the persecution of Julian Assange, publishing unsubstantiated and sensationalist allegations that the WikiLeaks publisher met with American political lobbyist, Paul Manafort.
One of the two authors of the Guardian article was, predictably, Luke Harding. Harding has penned a stream of material aimed at undermining support for Assange and WikiLeaks and attempting to justify the efforts of the US government to prosecute him for espionage or conspiracy. Assange aptly described an error-filled 2014 book written by Harding about whistleblower Edward Snowden and WikiLeaks as a “hack job in the purest sense of the word.
The allegation that Assange met with Manafort is another desperate effort to implicate WikiLeaks in the lurid claims of the Democratic Party, US intelligence agencies and much of the media that the Russian government “interfered” in the 2016 US presidential election to pr…