Skip to main content

Lapavitsas: 15-20% devaluation for the new drachma!

globinfo freexchange

SYRIZA MP, Costas Lapavitsas, during a recent interview in The Press Project website, analyzed among other things, the way through which Greece could design a possible exit from the euro currency, in order to be released from the ECB hegemony and build a growth plan. Grexit would also allow SYRIZA to implement its program as promised.

As he said, it has been proved that the internal devaluation was a tragic mistake in Greece's case. The unit labor cost has been crushed, but we haven't seen a boost in the exports until very recently, due to the fall of euro. Euro has fallen against dollar so we had a boost in the exports. Therefore, the perception that exports could save country is wrong. In the case of Greece, the percentage of exports to GDP is already small.

A possible external devaluation would not function through the exports. The Greek economy would not be saved through a boost in exports. It would be a matter of the internal market to cover the local demand. This would be the key role of the external devaluation and we could have seen much better results in this field.

Greece does not need a big external devaluation right now, exactly because the labor cost has been crushed. All these measures that did not save the country, destroyed labor cost. Therefore, a possible devaluation right now would not have to be very big. A devaluation of 15-20% would be quite enough.

Generally speaking, current account balance is zero because of the recession, therefore the pressure by the devaluation would not be very strong. Of course, in such a case we should have control of the capital flows. This would be a policy to limit the fall of the new parity. Initially, it is possible to have a fall of parity higher than 15-20%. During the first weeks we would see a rapid fall because of the speculative attacks, but it will not last too long. Parity for the new Greek currency would be stabilized at 15-20% below the 1 to 1 related to euro. This would probably take a few months.

Initially, at the time of the bigger devaluation, the government should take certain measures to protect the economy and the country. The government should secure financial sources to back the new currency. There are some ways through which the government could do this.

As Lapavitsas concluded, the reason for which we should examine the possibility of returning to a national currency, is the full implementation of SYRIZA's program. The key factor for the difficult position of Greece is the European Central Bank which uses the liquidity, meaning that Greece is not a sovereign state in the areas of currency and liquidity. The country is fully dependent on the ECB.*

The whole interview (in English, the second video below):

It was quite an interesting interview. However, Mr. Lapavitsas didn't mention a key issue, which is the control of the central bank. In case of returning to national currency, shouldn't Greece nationalize the central bank (or establish a new one), so that the state to have complete control of the monetary policy? Wouldn't this be essential for the country to be protected by speculation, or, a new round of financial war?

Many officials of the past and present Greek governments avoid to answer clearly. It seems that the answer to this question is still a taboo, for some reason.

The IMF worried that a devaluation of the ruble would set off a round of inflation. Its insistence on Russia maintaining an overvalued currency and its supporting that with billions of dollars of loans ultimately crushed the economy. (When the ruble was finally devalued in 1998, inflation did not soar as the IMF had feared, and the economy experienced its first significant growth.) [...] For the oligarchs trying to get their money out of the country, too, the overvalued exchange rate was a boon-it meant that they could get more dollars for their rubles, as they squirreled away their profits in foreign bank accounts.”


  1. Anonymous20/5/15 15:42

    It seem he doesn’t listen…It’s a pity. That man may be most likely after all an egomanic narcissist who cares only about himself. I suggest…to for a serious “boycottage” from his viewers so he will be left alone to realize his faults or at least that we are NOT sheep and do some practical stuff happen as an exchange. But if he does the same ridiculous charlatanism, we must do the same trick again. He is not to be trusted anymore.

    Or he is an incredible genius and we miscalculated in some shape or form in the most complex way possible.

    Anyway I will ring the bell to all his blog viewers to take a stand and stop giving him traffic, so he will learn his lesson. We don’t chew cheap pseudo-intellectualism of the buttocks which is all words and words and ZERO serious practical actions.

    Spread this with good smart will at every well-known visitor of Varoufakis’ blog, so he will learn to behave and think.


    1. The article is about Lapavitsas' positions in case you didn't notice. Anyway, Varoufakis and Lapavitsas are two of the best economists participating in a Greek government ever. What you say is the usual narrative by the mainstream media and the oligarchs behind them, who see such brilliant economists participating in a Leftist government as a threat for their sovereignty over the majority.

    2. Anonymous26/7/15 01:42

      I don't know under what basis you claim that Varoufakis and Lapavitsas are the best economists....

      Besides, I reckon that you are ignoring the fact that both Varoufakis and Lapavitsas are Professors.

      In real life Professors are no use, since theory and reality never meet. Things only get worse when you have them in charge; trust me I've seen this happening numerous times.

      If you don;t understand what I am saying perhaps you need to look around you and judge for yourself. It only took few months and the economy is crippled.

      If you still don't understand perhaps you have never worked in your life or you are just a fanatic.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Former Pentagon official confirms: Trump prepares for war with Iran

globinfo freexchange
Right after Trump's sudden announcement that he will withdraw the US forces from Syria, we had some mixed reactions. Some liberals reacted angrily, but most of the reactions from the liberal machine were rather moderate, or at least not as intensive as someone would normally expect.
On the other hand, Trump's supporters and all those who had enough of the pro-war neoliberal establishment, felt a kind of vindication, as it appeared that Trump would eventually keep its promise for an 'anti-interventionist' policy.
But the blog wrote immediately a 'not so fast' article to explain that most of the Americans and all those who are tired of the US endless wars, should not rush to celebrate. We estimated that Trump's move is probably a sign that he is going to re-organize troops and go after the big target called Iran.
Indeed, shortly after the move, Trump, suddenly again, announced that he will also pullout troops from Afghanistan.
And then, about…

Panicked neoliberal tools attempt to trigger a war of generations against AOC's progressive counterattack

globinfo freexchange
We were slightly surprised to see such an article title in one of the primary info tools of the global neoliberal regime and financial capital. But the subtitle immediately clarified everything.
When we read the title “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the Revenge of the Millennials” of the article in Bloomberg, we thought that we might be in front of a small miracle. We thought that the time has come for some people inside the core of the establishment apparatus to admit that the younger generations have lost dramatically from this brutal system. And so, the time has come to overthrow it, take their 'revenge'.
But no, it was too good to be true.
The subtitle immediately revealed the trick: “The Democrats’ major economic initiatives tend to favor the young at the expense of the old.”
Then, inside the article we read: “Almost every major new economic initiative proposed by Democrats — the Green New Deal, Medicare for all, debt-free college — has a common feature: Un…

Confirmed: Germany builds its own imperialist empire

globinfo freexchange
Almost two years ago we identified Germany's efforts to develop its military in the context of its ambition to build its own sphere of influence.
As we wrote, Brexit will give the chance to Germany to increase influence due to the change of power balance, especially now that France appears weak - crawling behind Berlin's austerity, sado-monetarism and neoliberal destruction. These conditions (created in the Greek experiment), are necessary to Germany in order to retain a model in favor of its surpluses. These could become the solid ground upon which Germany could build a strong, modern military machine.
Therefore, Merkel knows that the economic domination is not adequate for a country to become a major power. It is also important to have a strong military presence in its “sphere of influence”, or, its financial/debt colonies, if you prefer. The German military presence in Lithuania is a first step towards this direction as the Baltic countries have already be…

The desperate efforts of the Western neoliberal establishment to build a new propaganda machine

globinfo freexchange
The UK government and other Western governments and the US in recent years have had increasing difficulties persuading enough of their populations as to the legitimacy of the foreign policies that they have been pursuing.
And at the same time, Western countries have been going through a period of political crisis and economic crisis.
Piers Robinson, Chair in Politics, Society and Political Journalism at the University of Sheffield, further explains:
I think a lot of this drive is as much about trying to shore up shaky official narratives and trying to shore up political systems in a situation of political crisis, as it is actually about countering Russian propaganda.
I would suspect that that's a little bit of an excuse here to really what's going on of problems much closer to home.
This is not just to do to UK, this is Europe-wide. And there are also indications from the documents that they are intending to start to have some kind of impact within the United…

WikiLeaks disturbing and hopeful findings on Tulsi Gabbard's path to progressiveness

The definite detachment from the Clintonian machine
globinfo freexchange
Searching the Podesta emails inside WikiLeaks we found a rather disturbing fact about Tulsi Gabbard who recently announced that she will run for the 2020 US presidency. Iraq War Veteran, Jon Soltz, chairman at VoteVets at the time, sent an email on Aug. 2012 to Hillary Clinton top lobbyist, John Podesta, in order to thank him for his contribution to Gabbard's campaign in Hawaii.
Soltz wrote (emphasis added):
This morning, we are one step closer to making history. In Hawaii, VoteVets PAC-endorsed Iraq veteran Tulsi Gabbard has won her primary, in a stunning come-from-behind victory. If she wins in November, she along with Tammy Duckworth (who we also feel very good about), would be the first female combat veteran ever elected to Congress in United States history! This is happening because of you. Your tens of thousands of dollars in donations for Tulsi's campaign, through VoteVets PAC, allowed her to run a fir…

The difference between Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn and what the US elections won't allow you to decide

globinfo freexchange
A country that has been completely taken over by the banking mafia and the corporate power will never allow people to decide on the most important issue: the abolition of the dominant system that works against them.
Professor Richard Wolff explains:
Because of Bernie Sanders, particularly, we now have the word Socialism floating around, but typically it's about, more or less, really among Democrats. Like Mr. Sanders is ambiguously an independent but he's also a Democrat.
So, the ‘Socialists’ seemed to be the Democrats who want to do more for people. Social welfare, social supports, state supports, versus those who don't want to do quite so much - the centrist Democrats, like Clinton and Obama.
But the real question is a program of change. Socialism is a change of system it goes away from capitalism to do something else. It would be interesting if we could have an election ‘do we want that?’, ‘would we like a different system?’.
There are countries doing t…

The IMF is dismantling Argentina all over again

Part 1
In September, Argentine president Mauricio Macri accepted the 2018 Atlantic Council’s Global Citizen Award. In attendance were many of world’s neoliberal power players and policy makers, among them International Monetary Fund (IMF) Managing Director Christine Lagarde.
Facing the crowd, Macri gleefully admitted that “with Christine, I have to confess we started a great relationship some months ago,” referring to a series of loan agreements with the IMF amounting to $57.1 billion dollars. “I expect that this is going to work very well, and we will end up with the whole country crushing on Christine,” he continued.
This dynamic of chasing an improved image with the world’s big banks and the dominant economies in the West is emblematic of Macri’s priority to secure a relationship with the IMF and improve the country’s image with global financial institutions. But it comes at a devastating cost for the majority of the population who will suffer from neoliberal policy prescriptions of…

How neoliberalism manufactured consent to secure its unlimited power

From David Harvey's A Brief History of Neoliberalism
Part 11 – The Reagan/Thatcher neoliberal legacy: a bizarre form of a sinister political doctrine from which it would be difficult one to escape
But Thatcher had to fight the battle on other fronts. A noble rearguard action against neoliberal policies was mounted in many a municipality –– Sheffield, the Greater London Council (which Thatcher had to abolish in order to achieve her broader goals in the 1980s), and Liverpool (where half the local councillors had to be gaoled) formed active centres of resistance in which the ideals of a new municipal socialism (incorporating many of the new social movements in the London case) were both pursued and acted upon until they were finally crushed in the mid-1980s.
She began by savagely cutting back central government funding to the municipalities, but several of them responded simply by raising property taxes, forcing her to legislate against their right to do so. Denigrating the progressive…

Banishing Truth

by Chris Hedges
The investigative reporter Seymour Hersh, in his memoir “Reporter,” describes a moment when as a young reporter he overheard a Chicago cop admit to murdering an African-American man. The murdered man had been falsely described by police as a robbery suspect who had been shot while trying to avoid arrest. Hersh frantically called his editor to ask what to do.
The editor urged me to do nothing,” he writes. “It would be my word versus that of all the cops involved, and all would accuse me of lying. The message was clear: I did not have a story. But of course I did.” He describes himself as “full of despair at my weakness and the weakness of a profession that dealt so easily with compromise and self-censorship.
Hersh, the greatest investigative reporter of his generation, uncovered the U.S. military’s chemical weapons program, which used thousands of soldiers and volunteers, including pacifists from the Seventh-day Adventist Church, as unwitting human guinea pigs to measure…

All the right progressives are running for 2020 ... but they need a really smart strategy to have a chance against the neoliberal beast

globinfo freexchange
More than a year ago we wrote that the 2016 electoral process in the US was particularly useful because it highlighted many interesting unprecedented aspects. One of them, is that you don't need the mainstream media to promote you. Especially the young Americans discovered and promoted Bernie Sanders through the independent and social media on the Internet. Another aspect, is that you don't need big money to support you. These new conditions could be proven valuable towards the creation of a third political movement, coming straight from the people, which could seriously challenge the current corrupted political establishment.
We also wrote that we can think at least four progressives that should join forces to lead such a political movement right now: Jill Stein, Bernie Sanders, Tulsi Gabbard, Elizabeth Warren.
Three of them already revealed their intention to run for the 2020 US presidency. Assuming that the Greens won't change leadership, Jill Stein wi…