Skip to main content

Humans replaced by super-intelligent machines: Extinction or Evolution?

by system failure

In the famous movie “The Matrix”, machines are presented as evil, enslaved people using them for energy. But when agent Smith captures Morfeas, he says some interesting things to him: “I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species and I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment but you humans do not. You move to an area and you multiply and multiply until every natural resource is consumed and the only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is? A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. You're a plague and we are the cure.” Of course, Mr. Smith's view could be characterised as simplified, or, extremely cynical, but who could blame him when we look our civilization today?

Mr. Smith's view is totally compatible with the modern perception of economic growth. Countries struggle to stay alive in a global arena of cruel competition, where the top priority is the ongoing, unlimited growth. Economic growth at any cost, by any means, is the only answer for progress and prosperity inside our current system of values.

As the economic crisis hit many countries globally, the "need" for growth became a matter of life and death. When the bubble economy in the past years, especially during 90s, was distributing fake prosperity only to take it back a few decades later, the West had a chance to abandon an unstable version of capitalism and turn to an economic model which could bring us closer to the desirable balance with nature, more wise use of the natural resources, with the help of technology.

One step forward, two (or more) steps back

When the economic crisis hit the West, suddenly, every goal towards the direction of balance has been almost abandoned. The totally unstable and unequal model of financialised capitalism "rewarded" those who brought the distraction with more billions and threw entire countries to a cruel survival struggle. And now, these countries are begging for investments and growth from the same institutions that created this mess.

Prior to the crisis, there was a tension for investments in clean energy. For example, European Union set some goals for 2020, concerning the increasing penetration of renewable energy systems inside the energy mixture of the EU, combined with specific targets for the restriction of carbon emissions. Even Obama made some statements, that forms of clean energy could bring growth and jobs as a solution to the destruction by the crisis. All these things now appear to be left behind because the goal is only one: Unlimited growth at any cost.

Instead of using part of the liquidity to invest in sectors of green energy and environmental projects, every state directed all of the liquidity to the bankers who do not care, of course, if the planet needs another, truly viable model. Add to all these the geopolitical games with oil pipes and you have a pretty good picture of the two (or more) steps backwards.

Meanwhile, the population increases together with the energy consumption and environmental pollution. Scientists warn about the implications in the close future for the environment and the natural resources, but only few appear to be truly concerned. Politicians surrendered to the oligarchs only to keep alive a failed model in every aspect.

Our "civilized" system of values

As a civilization, we abandoned classical values and classical terms. The language has been relativized and the line between good and bad, right and wrong, has almost vanished. It was supposed that we should be more wiser from this process of abandoning the interpretation of meanings in absolute terms, yet our civilization turned out to be more primitive in the cultural level.

A whole system took advantage of these new conditions. It has transformed planet earth into a global arena of ruthless competition with profit as the only ultimate goal. Someone asks a trader in the food stock market, how does he feel knowing that his actions may lead thousands to hunger in another corner of the planet, and all he gets as an answer is "that's my job, that's what I do", like devil's advocate, Kevin Lomax. In fact, he doesn't even understand the question!

Or, "What's the social benefit from a lot of highly trained PhDs in physics using exceptionally expensive technology across the world to be able to set derivatives prices in a split second? Why set them in a split second? Set them in an hour. Set them in a day. Never set them at all. What's the benefit?", as Costas Lapavitsas masterfully wondered.

Economic cynicism is absolutely dominant in the core or our system of values. Instead of trying to change this one-dimensional thinking, we preserve it through our actions. The whole system drives societies deeper into this vicious circle, as more and more people are struggling to survive.

Poor Ayn ...

In her famous novel “Atlas Shrugged”, Ayn Rand describes a situation where an elite of industrialists, abruptly disappearing, leaving their industries to failure. At that time, the novel was not very successful, perhaps because Rand couldn't probably imagine what would be the impact in case that all the workers, farmers, schoolteachers and generally, ordinary working class people, would disappear.

Rand was one of the key people who contributed to the creation of this culture of economic cynicism and extreme individualism. A fundamental aspect of this culture, is that societies are guided to progress and prosperity by an elite of a few charismatic individuals, motivated by personal interest, while the state is the enemy of freedom and prosperity.

Well, here comes the surprise. We are now in a phase where an economically powerful elite is automating all the production process, trying also to control all the resources. Quite soon, big businesses will be able to use exclusively robots instead of human labour.

So, does Ayn Rand, surprisingly, turns that she was right? Rather not, because two major problems arise: First, if all the production is automatized and the workers lose their jobs, who will consume the products? Second, what if super-intelligent machines will become able to evolve without the help of any human presence?

"Cold blood" robots vs cynical humans

We should start to wonder: is it worth to continue to ruin our planet just to self-destruct one day? Wouldn't be better to be replaced by something which would understand the value of achieving an equilibrium with natural environment in order to survive?

Many people already concerned about the possibility that super-intelligent machines in future will turn against humans. Scientists already warned about such a scenario. But honestly, if you were an observer outside the system of the planet earth, who would be more odious to you: a cynical human being destroying the planet just to preserve a way of life without meaning, or, a “cold blood” robot that would decide to destroy humans to save the planet and its resources?

What is really the point of preserving such a civilization? A stagnated situation of people who are struggling to survive, consume, or, chasing profit? How we differ from parasites who keep consuming because they don't understand that they live in a planet with certain limits and resources?

What if Artificial Intelligence is meant to be the next step of human evolution itself? What difference does it make when we progressively abolishing human conquered concepts, like morality, from our culture? If we want truly evolve, as humanity, we need to bring back morality. We need to develop concepts like solidarity, altruism, collectivity and put them in the core of our civilization. Otherwise, it would make no difference - and probably would be better - to be replaced by super-intelligent machines.

Read also:





Comments

  1. Anonymous10/1/15 04:34

    ICARUS HAS FOUND YOU

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10/1/15 17:53

    A high quality way of life is the only thing that gives life any meaning at all. Without it you are just a dumb animal doing dumb animal things.

    If you don't realize this then maybe you aren't as deep a thinker as you think.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9/8/16 01:45

      Wow, So, living a "high quality" of life, is worth killing the planet?... me thinks you are the "dumb animal"....sinking to your most base instincts of pleasure and comfort.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous23/2/15 23:51

    we will have a virus....long incubation period to ensure mass kill off.....70%of the worlds population will be dead....then the planet can rest....

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous30/8/15 01:05

    Not all humans are bad....but good humans are getting harder to find.
    Humanity will get what it deserves, if machines intervene of not.

    ReplyDelete
  5. We can preserve our way of life by programming the machines in tge ways of capitalism... Seriously, aside from the Matrix, what proof have you that robots wouldn't be worse on the environment? The have no use for breathable air, livable climates, food etc. Perhaps we've been terraforming for our robot overloards the whole time...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9/8/16 01:50

      uummm .... robots are "MADE OF SOMETHING".... start with iron ore or what ever mineral... if your make a few billion... just think of THAT?.... JUST LIKE THE RENEWABLE REVOLUTION... it's all made of something... that has to be dug up, shipped and manufactured... we really should stop deluding ourselves.... mass production of ANYTHING.... IS DESTRUCTIVE.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MSNBC poll on Julian Assange backfires epically

globinfo freexchange
Frequently - if not always - polls set-up by corporate media aim to track public opinion on a specific issue. The results could be used by the deep state apparatus in order to justify an action, or, figure out how to handle a negative trend for the deep state agenda.
Of course, the question could be set-up in a very simplified and convenient manner, so that the results could be translated accordingly.
Yet, the results from the following MSNBC poll on Julian Assange are so devastating for the deep state planning that leave little room for any misconception and manipulation.
Specifically, you have two options to answer the following question: “Should Julian Assange be prosecuted for his involvement in WikiLeaks?
The first option is to answer that "Yes, he is a criminal."
The second option is to answer that "No, he is a whistleblower and deserves protection."
At the time we checked out the results, the second answer prevailed overwhelmingly with 95% (~1…

Trump's failure to start a civil war in Venezuela could be proved disastrous for the plans of the US imperialists

by system failure
Donald Trump and his bloodthirsty warhawks are about to break the record of failed attempted coups against a single country. Concerning Latin America, the US imperialists were setting the desirable conditions for their corporate beasts usually by overthrowing governments and supporting military dictatorships.
But Trump himself has already broken another record. The record of not keeping his promises to the American people - every one of them. The 'anti-interventionist', 'anti-establishment' Trump, has already started a war against Venezuela, which so far includes brutal economic sanctions, sabotage operations, attempted coups. Trump not only does whatever he can in order to satisfy the US neocon/neoliberal establishment and the deep state, but especially in the case of Venezuela, he follows the obsolete CIA playbook to the letter.
So, after a series of failed orchestrated coups, Trump's warhawks attempted to start a civil war in Venezuela by mobiliz…

Former top US official confirms: military action against Venezuela will become a Vietnam 2.0 for the US imperialists

globinfo freexchange
Former US Chief of Staff for Secretary of State, Lawrence Wilkerson, spoke with Sharmini Peries of the Real News about Trump's plans for a potential US military action against Venezuela.

As he pointed out:
Elliott Abrams, Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, and the administration’s approach to Venezuela, is as if they were Panama or they were Honduras. They are not. They’re very professional. That puts them above Argentina, above Chile, whose militaries are quite competent, too. 
Mr. Trump ought to be very, very careful about saying he’s going to send marines or soldiers to Venezuela because the Venezuelan military will be unified immediately. It will take to the hills and it will fight as the Vietnamese did during the Vietnam War, and as the Taliban are in Afghanistan right now: to the last marine, to the last soldier.
Putin is a smart man, probably told Trump 'you don’t want to get involved in those jungles. You don’t want to get involved in those mountains. You …

Latest ridiculous attempts by the US propaganda machine on Gaza, Venezuela – enjoy

globinfo freexchange
Plenty of propaganda is manufactured by the US deep state apparatus to push for the imperialist agenda. Yet, some elements of the propaganda machine are still unable to realize that independent truth seekers and real journalists are watching, and therefore, these elements could be easily exposed.
Sloppy efforts immediately backfire in social media and the Internet. Most recent sloppy efforts are related to Gaza and Venezuela.
As the Newsweekreported:
Senior 2020 Trump campaign adviser Katrina Pierson used a 2015 video showing a Ukrainian rocket launch alongside comments about this weekend's deadly attacks between Israel and Gaza militants and a condemnation of congresswoman Ilhan Omar.
Pierson, who was Donald Trump's 2016 campaign spokesperson and is a frequent cable news guest, shared the video—which was first posted online in 2015 and reportedly shows Ukraine launching dozens of rockets at Russian-backed separatists—on Sunday.
Alongsi…

Fox clowns committed suicide by bringing Bernie Sanders inside their nest to destroy them

... and the liberal centrists must be really pissed off
globinfo freexchange
It was epic indeed. The moment where the crowd inside the Fox ultra-right nest enthusiastically cheers in favor of a government-run healthcare system, could actually be considered a historical moment, thanks to Bernie Sanders.
The moment clearly depicts and officially marks the end of controlled audiences in controlled MSM environments. It shows that the well-paid MSM pundits and their producers are finding increasingly difficult to set up the scene according to the desirable agenda. Therefore, audience reactions can't be directed, or predicted in many cases by the MSM 'experts'.
The shock for the MSM tools was inevitable. It shows that they are now completely detached from the ordinary people and their problems.
But the whole thing highlighted something even more fundamental. It was another loud evidence for the fact that the BS neoliberal narratives don't work anymore.
And even more remarkably, th…

CNN sets up a fully controlled audience panel to promote pro-establishment candidates using Bernie Sanders progressive agenda

 An example of advanced psy-ops by the corporate media 

globinfo freexchange

As we wrote recently, the moment where the crowd inside the Fox ultra-right nest enthusiastically cheers in favor of a government-run healthcare system, could actually be considered a historical moment, thanks to Bernie Sanders.

The moment clearly depicts and officially marks the end of controlled audiences in controlled MSM environments. It shows that the well-paid MSM pundits and their producers are finding increasingly difficult to set up the scene according to the desirable agenda. Therefore, audience reactions can't be directed, or predicted in many cases by the MSM 'experts'.
Now, here is an example showing a successful set up through a controlled audience. It took place inside CNN and there is plenty of evidence that was indeed carefully set up. In the following video, Mike Figueredo of the Humanist Report felt optimistic, but also quite frustrated at the same time. Figueredo's reaction …

Chelsea Manning proves that she is a real hero

globinfo freexchange
Outside of an Alexandria, Virginia courtroom, Chelsea Manning explained to reporters why she would refuse to testify before a second grand jury investigating Wikileaks' Julian Assange, and as a result, face jail time once again. On May 9, Manning was released from jail because the term of the last grand jury she refused to testify before expired. She was immediately subpoenaed once again—for May 16.
Her following words clearly depict that Chelsea Manning is a person with strong and solid principles and a real hero:
I will not cooperate with this or any other grand jury, so it doesn’t matter what it is, or what the case is. I’m just not going to comply or cooperate. Facing jail again, potentially today, doesn’t change my stance. The prosecutors are deliberately placing me in an impossible position: go to jail and face the prospect of being held in contempt again, or, in the alternative, foregoing my principles, the strong positions that I have, that I hold dear…

Updates for a possible coup against Jeremy Corbyn

 globinfo freexchange

In this episode of RT's Going Underground, former MP and author of A Very British Coup and The Friends of Harry Perkins, Chris Mullin, spoke about the history of MI5 and MI6 meddling in UK politics against Labour Party leaders. He also estimated whether a British coup is underway against Jeremy Corbyn.
The story of A Very British Coup was set in the 1980s when there was speculation about the possibility of a government led by someone like Tony Benn and the establishment conspired to bring it down. The establishment in this case being a sort of mixture of the security and intelligence services, the media barons, with a little help from the Americans. 
Tony Benn looked likely to become deputy leader of the Labour Party which at the time was strongly challenging the government of Margaret Thatcher in the opinion polls. Persistent rumours circulated over the years about attempts by members of the British security services, and other wings of the British Establish…

Chemical weapons assessment contradicting official Syria narrative is authentic

The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has begun responding to queries by the press about a leaked document which contradicts official OPCW findings on an alleged chemical weapons attack last year in Douma, Syria. The prepared statement they’ve been using in response to these queries confirms the authenticity of the document.
To recap, a few days ago the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media (WGSPM) published a document signed by a man named Ian Henderson, whose name is seen listed in expert leadership positions on OPCW documents from as far back as 1998 and as recently as 2018. It’s unknown who leaked the document and what other media organizations they may have tried to send it to.
The report picks apart the extremely shaky physics and narratives of the official OPCW analysis on the gas cylinders allegedly dropped from Syrian government aircraft in the Douma attack, and concludes that “The dimensions, characteristics and appearance of the cylinders, a…

How GMO seeds and Monsanto/Bayer’s “RoundUp” are driving US policy in Venezuela

With Juan Guaidó’s parallel government attempting to take power with the backing of the U.S., it is telling that the top political donors of those in the U.S. most fervently pushing regime change in Venezuela have close ties to Monsanto and major financial stakes in Bayer.
by Whitney Webb
Part 3 - The AEI axis
Some of the key figures and loudest voices supporting the efforts of the Trump administration to overthrow the Venezuelan government in the United States are well-connected to one particular think-tank, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). For instance, John Bolton — now Trump’s national security advisor and a major player in the administration’s aggressive Venezuela policy — was a senior fellow at AEI until he became Trump’s top national security official. As national security adviser, Bolton advises the president on foreign policy and issues of national security while also advising both the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense. As of late, he has been pushing for …