Skip to main content

Already happens: Capitalism destroys human labor force and goes to the next phase

by system failure

Connecting the dots one can discover the most nightmarish scenarios. Destructive capitalism's next phase is the total substitution of the human labor force with robotic machines, or in other words, the hyper-automatization. There is a process taking place right now, and no one (or nearly no one) knows what would happen after its completion.

The true picture behind unemployment

From a latest article in PressTV:

Did you know that there are nearly 102 million working age Americans that do not have a job right now? And 20 percent of all families in the United States do not have a single member that is employed. So how in the world can the government claim that the unemployment rate has “dropped” to '6.3 percent'?”

Well, it all comes down to how you define who is 'unemployed'. For example, last month the government moved another 988,000 Americans into the 'not in the labor force' category.”


102(!) million working age Americans that do not have a job right now? 20%(!) of all families in the US do not have a single member that is employed? Do you find these numbers exaggerated? Maybe not, if you read the following story by the "eye-witness" Yanis Varoufakis.

What is going on in front of our eyes?

Yanis Varoufakis in his article "What if the capital of future doesn't need us?", describes what he saw in Austin-Texas and what that means:

While I was watching from my window in Austin-Texas, I saw a big cloud of dust deep in horizon. Two days ago, I was walking in that area and I was surprised by the view of the big factory where bulldozers and machines were continuously working, producing the dust. From the front side of the building under construction it was obvious that (fortunately) they were not building a new trade center or apartment blocks. No, it was a big industrial center.”

Although I didn't notice it the first time, after a few seconds I realised that something was missing from this factory: people! Specifically, I counted three. All of them were wearing helmets and protection suits and were located in a small office in a space outside with a few computers, while they were covered by a tent like those used by the army. Ten bulldozers, three cranes and more or less ten moving tools, at least from what I could see, were moving without drivers, operators, workers generally.”

When I returned to my office, I went straight to find a colleague who knows well what's going on. He informed me that the workplace I saw, was the new factory of Apple to produce MacBook Pro. It was true that, it was constructed through almost complete automatization. The materials had been selected through a way with which, the automatic machines - therefore robots connected to eachother through a local wireless network (intranet) - to be able to construct without human interference - even the hydraulic structure of the building will be constructed by plumpers-robots. A factory that under normal conditions should employ thousands of workers is functioning with the presence of less than one hundred souls.”

I asked him about the move of Apple to produce computers in America, by bringing back in the US the production from China for the first time after decades. 'How's that?' And the answer was the expected one, although quite impressive: 'Wages are of no importance. The export of productive processes from America to China (off-shoring) was only an intermediate stage. The production has returned to America, but not the jobs. The new factory of Apple, not only is constructed without American workers' sweat, but will also produce MacBook Pro through complete automatization, without hiring Texans. Welcome to the New, Brave World', ended with a smile, referring obviously to the Brave New World of Aldous Huxley.”

[...]

When bulldozers and plumpers-robots that at this moment build the new factory of Apple, will start to learn from eachother and cooperate inside a robotic network, even the few jobs concerning the operation of these robots will vanish. In case that these armies of interconnected machine slaves belonged to everyone, thus if everyone had the right to benefit from the goods that they produce, then no problem. What should be done, however, in case that these machine slaves, the capital of future, belong (like the most of today's capital) to the very few, while at the same time most of the people do not have access in the goods they produce and an opportunity to work for a (human) wage?”


Capital "hyperaccumulation" : Useful for the next stage

Economic crises are used to destroy big competitors and keep the value of money high, through capital "hyperaccumulation". Capital "hyperaccumulation", however, is also used to fund the next stage of the destructive capitalism which is hyper-automatization.

How all these connected to the Greek experiment?

How long a society could tolerate an unemployment rate of 30% - 50% without uprising that could bring an "instability" to the system? When unemployment rate for the young people has reached 60%? When pensions and wages have been cut? How much the unemployment benefit should be cut in order to allow people to survive and consume without uprising? How many could be left totally helpless without any kind of social benefit? How much the mainstream media propaganda affects people in order to stay scared inside their homes without uprising?

The new nightmarish facts in Greek experiment could be proved quite useful for the big companies that hyper-automatize production and seek to remove the human labor costs.

Someone has to consume

The big question is: If all the production will be automatized (even the services sector), who will consume the products? Are we going to a model that most of the people will be receiving unemployment benefits just to survive and consume?

In overpopulated developing countries there are huge potential consumer tanks. Their consuming power will rise and the complete automatization of the production there will take decades. However, the suitable conditions should be created first, in the aged and saturated West, in order a limit in wages to be established and the expansion of the Western social state model to be prevented because all these things mean an additional cost for the global economic oligarchy:


The new model could lead to a future Dystopia beyond any fantasy:

In the middle of the pyramid, a restructured class will serve and secure the domination of the top. Corporate executives, big journalists, scientific elites, suppression forces. It is characteristic that academic research is directed on the basis of the profits of big corporations. Funding is directed increasingly to practical applications in areas that can bring huge profits, like for example, the higher automatization of production and therefore, the profit increase through the restriction of jobs.”

The base of the pyramid will be consisted by the majority of workers in global level, with restricted wages, zero labor rights, and nearly zero opportunities for activities other than consumption.”

[...]

However, the most horrific thing of all will be the expansion of the lower social level, consisted by millions of people all over the planet, which will be left without any kind of help, dying in extreme poverty, since the global economic elite will secure its domination through the oversupply of labor force and consumers.

Unfortunately, already, the human life increasingly lose value...”


Are they all, so well designed?

Probably not. One can imagine, more or less, what is being discussed in closed rooms of economic forums and Bilderberg conferences behind cameras, but that does not mean that the designers of the new world order can build everything in detail.

In many cases in the past, predictions and designs of various think tanks have failed because there is no perfect theory that can predict everything with accuracy and include all the unexpected facts.

It is obvious that the subsection of the global economic oligarchy in Greece, fears a possible "accident" in euro elections since things are not going well for the traditional parties in power which support the local capital, and this is depicted in the way that the mainstream media propaganda culminates as we get closer to the euro elections day.

This means that, the struggle of people against the future Dystopia is not futile at all ...

Comments

  1. Anonymous9/5/14 18:39

    This explains the alternative:

    http://www.economonitor.com/lrwray/2013/11/21/bow-down-to-the-bubble-larry-summerian-endorses-bubbleonian-madness-and-paul-krugman-embraces-the-hansenian-stagnation-thesis/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous30/7/14 17:49

    So no more physical labor. big deal. We will get over it and evolve.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not that simple I'm afraid. I wish it was ...

      Delete
    2. Anonymous14/7/15 14:29

      "In case that these armies of interconnected machine slaves belonged to everyone, thus if everyone had the right to benefit from the goods that they produce, then no problem. What should be done, however, in case that these machine slaves, the capital of future, belong (like the most of today's capital) to the very few…?"

      Delete
  3. Over the last year I have written several articles about robots including the one below about how they will take away many employment opportunities. If robot factories are the future then let them be located in America.

    While they would not necessarily be a massive creator of jobs they would at least allow us to have control of our own manufacturing. Over the last three decades robots have become far more common in factories many have become dominated by robots. The article below looks at this job killer and how it might effect all of us.

    http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2013/04/robot-factories-mean-less-jobs.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. A few generations ago 50% of people toiled away on farms, then came tractors and combines,etc. Now- less than 2% produce much more & cheaper food....... times change! Farm work is horrid, so is factory work- good riddance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14/7/15 14:36

      Good riddance if we don't need to work anymore, sure.

      BUT…

      The problem is : WHO OWNS the robots, and therefore who gets the whole benefits?

      If workers are useless, do you think capitalist will share their benefits with them?
      The probability they will decide to eliminate - yes, physically eliminate - the 'useless' part of mankind is much bigger... That's you and me and our relatives and most people !

      Delete
  5. Thank you all for your comments and links. Progress in not the issue here. Fully automated societies would be a huge step for humanity to solve many problems as long as serve equally all humans and respect the environment. Current sociological model is deeply rely on inequality more and more, expanding fast. Even capitalism in its classical form won't work for the benefit of all humans under full automation. Instead of truly evolve towards a more viable model the system "evolves" to an opposite direction bringing nightmarish imbalances and instability. Read also:

    http://failedevolution.blogspot.gr/2014/08/the-dominant-elite-ready-to-break.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. I traveled the country as a trucker for years. Starting in about 1996 i kept meeting people who would tell me of whole factorys closing down and going to China. I figured out was for cheaper labor and no regulations. But the first thing i thought,was what jobs will replace all these ones we are losing.? This went on for years, sometimes the amount of people losing their jobs was incredible. Now i look around and there are so many people unemployed and all i hear about is high tech jobs. Yeah.. will i can only see so many of those. The schools push common core which is heavy on math. I guess they think we need engineers and scientist. And with this whole global economy thinking, Kids get to compete with all the future scientist from around the world. I think this isn't thought out to well.
    The U.S. seem's to be the worlds exporters of death right now. So i wonder about our governments thinking. I don't see much long term thinking anyhow.2015 should be an interesting year. Many of the things our president wanted or started come into play. Along with the cost of which the public will learn about soon.
    I recommend this web site,check it out for a week. Learn some things from non PC thinking people. And no im just a reader of this site. The Burning Platform. Is the name.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So, sorry to tell folks like "anonymous" and others that this is NOT a sociological issue, it is a purely economic issue. It is this simple: consumer spending drives capitalist economies. The amount of consumer spending is directly related to the disposable income of individuals participating in that economy. And where do we get disposable income? Wages. Wages are the source of the majority of Americans disposable income, i.e. consumer spending. No jobs = no wages = no one to buy products and services = stalled and then crashed economy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a huge potential of consumers due to unprecedented human population. Once wages will further rise in China-South East Asia, there will be plenty of consumers to buy more products. However, I'm afraid that this is also only a transition phase. It's not a matter of money, they can print as much as they want. It's a matter of power and control. Once the elites reach the point to control all the resources and the means of production, the model will change from capitalism to global feudalism.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7/6/15 23:32

      In all history progress comes from free men and women. Slavery (including robots) is the mother of complete stagnation.
      Many of our modern inventions were invented as toys and amusements in ancient Greece, Babylon, Rome. But they stayed amusements. The will for progress wasn't there because of slavery.
      This NWO isn't new at all...it's very old indeed. The elite will eat each other, betray each other. Historians will study the meteoric rise and total failure of its hubris.

      Delete
  8. I wonder about your term "destructive capitalism." The corporations who give us open borders, off shoring, and sovereignty-dilution trade agreements, among other things, fit into that category well. They are large enough and politically influential enough to be able to enjoy "crony capitalism" as well. So they enjoy the income they can obtain from low wages anywhere in the world and from manipulating the political process. (There is also the problem of the financial elite who have done much damage by fiddling with money and disconnecting it from productive activity.)

    There's another kind of "capitalism" that leftists like to talk about. It is the heavily-regulated and taxed bastard, gelded, immobilized goat version of something or other where the vitality of entrepreneurship and genuinely free markets is wrung out of the economy. So we have not socialism but a fascism lite with the government controlling everything with a blossoming, metastasizing network of regulations and inspectors and tax eaters. However, the current situation is held up as "capitalism" from which we must flee eo instante into the arms of our socialist and communist masters.

    All of the above refers to economic actors who act with either a disembodied pursuit of profit or in aid of a yet more destructive political control.

    The possibility of actual free markets thus ends up being discounted, even worked against. Economic life gets controlled by grifters, sociopaths, and Stalinists. If it is useful to talk about "destructive capitalism" I think there is an obligation to recognize that a ton of our problems have come about because we refuse to acknowledge the enormous value of having small business who DO have the interests of the citizens as their primary objective. In the process, too, we all need to focus on how the federal government (and the uber-diseased E.U.) have grown to such enormous proportions as to be beyond popular control. In short, we need to refocus on liberty. Too many individuals and entities are profiting at the expense of liberty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you but we have grifters, sociopaths and Stalinists NOW. they are two heads of the same monster.

      I am a small business owner and my Main St operation is shrinking and shrinking to where our 'off season' is now 6 or 7 months of the year. Our customers are families - and they stop spending even the last week of October - because Halloween is a budget buster.

      The super bowl is a budget buster... every paycheck is accounted for ... and anything added... pizza, beer, chips... means they don't spend on other things.

      Nail parlors, gold buyers and tattoo parlors are popping up where women's stores, formal wear and music stores went out of business.

      So the need for 'small business' .. and we have a GREAT niche... is drying up as well.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How a group of economists undermined public institutions, paving the way to neoliberalism

An assumption had become a truth. The self-interested model of human behaviour, that had been developed in the Cold War to make the mathematical equations work, had now been adopted by these economists as a fundamental truth about the reality of all human social interaction.
globinfo freexchange
A group of economists in the early 70s arbitrarily adopted the self-interested model of human behaviour that had been developed in the Cold War, to explain the dysfunctionality of public institutions. This perception would become a powerful tool in the hands of the neoliberal ideology, carried by big banks and corporations, to demonize the state and dismantle any state control upon them at the expense of the societies.
In his documentary The Trap, Adam Curtis explains:
In the early 70s, the government bureaucracies in Britain began to collapse. Those around them blamed a growing economic crisis, but it was clear that something much more fundamental had gone wrong. What were supposed to be institut…

Italy, Greece, Deutsche Bank: heavy clouds of non-linear collapse gather again above Europe

globinfo freexchange
For nearly ten years now, the key decision centers inside eurozone are trying to hide the huge problems, pretending that the crisis is behind, in order to maintain a completely failed economic model, which also reveals, day by day, its authoritarian nature and despise against real Democracy. The totally problematic structure of eurozone makes things even worse.
In Italy, we had another political crisis and a constitutional coup because the new majority and potential coalition government is not likeable to the Brussels/Berlin axis.
In Greece, things are not looking better. The country is about to exit the IMF-type neoliberal program imposed by the Troika (ECB, European Commission, IMF), in August. Yet, the economy is still in very bad shape, drowning in stagnation, with unprecedented unemployment, nearly zero growth and a national debt at 180% of GDP, which is actually much higher than Greece's debt in 2010 (120% of GDP) when crisis hit the country!
In fact, the eu…

More evidence that the 2011 riots in Syria were sparked by a false flag operation

globinfo freexchangeIndependent journalist Eva Bartlett spoke with Lee Camp about her recent trip in Syria. Bartlett visited the hospital in Douma where many victims of the latest alleged chemical attack went to receive medical care. Bartlett spoke with a medical student who was working the day of the alleged attack, and actually confirmed the reporting by the veteran journalist Robert Fisk, according to which there was no evidence of a chemical attack.
Bartlett also went to Daraa, where the first protests took place in 2011, and spoke to people there. They confirmed what many other investigative journalists support. 

This is strong evidence that it was a false flag operation that actually sparked the subsequent riots:
In the initial protest, Daraa was named as the birthplace of the so-called revolution. And Daraa is a city in the very south of Syria, not a very large city, and a rather unlikely city for a so-called revolution to have started. But prior going to Daraa, I interviewed a do…

WikiLeaks reveals Italian officials had serious concerns about Italy's ability to participate in the monetary union already since the late 70s

The WIKILEAKS Public Library of US Diplomacy (PlusD)holds the world's largest searchable collection of United States confidential, or formerly confidential, diplomatic communications. As of April 8, 2013 it holds 2 million records comprising approximately 1 billion words. The collection covers US involvements in, and diplomatic or intelligence reporting on, every country on earth. It is the single most significant body of geopolitical material ever published. The PlusD collection, built and curated by WikiLeaks, is updated from a variety of sources, including leaks, documents released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and documents released by the US State Department systematic declassification review.
globinfo freexchange
A 1978 cable from the US Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs to the Secretary of State, was monitoring in detail the Italian serious concerns on the perspective of Italy joining the European monetary union. It describes an atmosphere of anxiety insi…

How eurozone became a financial dictatorship

It all started with the silent coup against Ireland
globinfo freexchange
In 2010, Ireland experienced Frankfurt's political blackmail. On the 18th of November, where there was a governing council of the ECB in Frankfurt. The governor of the Irish central bank who sat on the governing council, called "Morning Ireland" which is the most important radio program in Ireland, to say that Ireland will need what he called a loan. He didn't warn the government about it and this created a massive panic.
Then, the next day, there was a letter written from the then president of ECB, Jean-Claude Trichet, to Brian Lenihan, the minister of finance at the time, saying that 'if you don't apply the so-called bailout program, by this opening of the markets the following Monday, we're going to cut off access to Emergency Liquidity Assistance (ELA)', which obviously would have collapsed the Irish banking system.
The ECB used the liquidity weapon in order to impose its terms o…

David Harvey: unless there is some real new thinking, another crisis is inevitable

globinfo freexchange
Chris Hedges spoke with David Harvey about the repeated crises of the capitalist system, which generate further instability, especially since the early 70s where we have the rise of financial capitalism and neoliberal ideology.
As Harvey points out:
Interestingly, in almost every crisis there has been a good deal of re-evaluation of exactly how to think about the economy, how to think about the relationship between state power and politics and all this kind of stuff.
Since 2007-08, is hardly any new thinking at all. And actually, we're trying to hang on. And we are trying to hang on because the oligarchy - which has all of the money, all of the power - is actually in a situation where it does not want any change. And until we confront the oligarchy, we're not going to find a way of exiting from this, apart from repeating what happened in 2007-08.
And the interesting thing when you look back, before 2007-08, and you see big financial crises in Argentina, in Braz…

The facts about Venezuela’s May 20th Presidential Election

Despite a high level of election transparency, one that Jimmy Carter called “the best in the world”, the US and its allies have accused Venezuela of election fraud. Caleb Maupin breaks down how Venezuela’s electoral system really works.
by Caleb T. Maupin
Part 3 - Accusations of Fraud
Despite the stringent safeguards in place to protect Venezuela’s election integrity, international media based in Western countries have widely claimed the election was fraudulent. Those claiming that the results are illegitimate have cited prior statements from SmartMatic, a corporation based in London that manufactured Venezuela’s voting machines. An official statement from SmartMatic claimed the 2017 Constitutional Referendum vote showed “tamper evident.” Statements from SmartMatic have been vague about how exactly the results were illegitimate or what malpractice took place.
Tibisay Lucena, president of the National Elections Center (CNE), says the claims from SmartMatic and its Chief Executive Antonio …

Will the Swiss citizens beat the banksters today?

About 5.3 million Swiss citizens, including registered members of the Swiss Abroad community, are eligible to take part in the June 10, 2018 ballot. Votes on a broad range of issues, as well as elections, also take place in many cantons and municipalities across the country.
globinfo freexchange
The Swiss sovereign-money referendum of June 2018, also known as the Sovereign-Money Initiative, aims to give the central bank of Switzerland the sole authority of "creating money."
This is actually what the proponents of the Swiss "Vollgeld Initiative" want. They say only the government, through the publicly-owned Swiss central bank (SNB), should be able to create money and put it into circulation.
The Sovereign Money Initiative aims to give the Swiss Confederation a monopoly on money creation, including demand deposit (full-reserve banking, by including the creation of scriptural money in the legal mandate of the Swiss National Bank. The name of the initiative was inspired by…

Stock market: one of the biggest frauds in the age of financial capitalism

globinfo freexchange
Lee Camp speaks with Tan Liu about his revealing book The Ponzi Factor, where Liu exposes all the big fraud of the stock market. Liu explains why the stock market, especially today, in the era of financial capitalism, is the purest definition of a Ponzi scheme:
The issue, of course, is profits from stocks and what makes a stock price move, is not the earnings and growth. It is actually money from another investor. Now, is there a connection at all with respect to earnings and growth and this price movement? Yes, it's called a speculative connection. It is not a legal one. It is not a logical one. It is not a definitive, or, a mathematical one.
The SEC defines three basic features of a Ponzi scheme:
One, it is an investment scenario. Two, the investment profits come from other investors. Three, the investors think the profits come from somewhere else.
What we can clearly observe every single day, every single moment the stocks are trading, is an event where the stoc…

Marx predicted our present crisis – and points the way out

The Communist Manifesto foresaw the predatory and polarised global capitalism of the 21st century. But Marx and Engels also showed us that we have the power to create a better world.
by Yanis Varoufakis
Part 1 - The spirit of communism driving the manifesto is proving hard to silence
For a manifesto to succeed, it must speak to our hearts like a poem while infecting the mind with images and ideas that are dazzlingly new. It needs to open our eyes to the true causes of the bewildering, disturbing, exciting changes occurring around us, exposing the possibilities with which our current reality is pregnant. It should make us feel hopelessly inadequate for not having recognised these truths ourselves, and it must lift the curtain on the unsettling realisation that we have been acting as petty accomplices, reproducing a dead-end past. Lastly, it needs to have the power of a Beethoven symphony, urging us to become agents of a future that ends unnecessary mass suffering and to inspire humanity …