Skip to main content

The age of stagnating revolutions(?)

by system failure

Alain Badiou, the famous French philosopher, has told that "capitalism is the impose of a peculiar time, a time of a titular endless transformation, while in reality time is stagnating...".

This stagnating situation appears to be confirmed with a characteristic way through the movements of the latest years in the European south, East Mediterranean and the Arab World. What we see, is in essence, the result of societies trapped inside a one-dimensional cultural totalitarianism.

During the last three years, many riots of different intensities took place - and some of them are still active - in those countries, a combined area of more than 15 million square kilometres and total population of nearly 460 million people.

Despite the huge total size of these countries, someone would sense that almost nothing changes. Neither the importance of these riots seems to mobilize West, which is not particularly interested for the future of millions of people. The United States, specifically, are trying to get over with open fronts, probably due to the fact that some new big oil and natural gas fields have been found inside their territory. It appears that they only want to control Russian influence in Europe, by promoting oil and natural gas pipelines, controlled by Western companies. A recent example, is the deal of the TAP pipeline from Azerbaijan, to compete against South Stream, the Russian interests' pipeline.

In Egypt, for example, after the fall of the Mubarak regime, authoritarianism and police violence continued unabated. It seems that not too many things have changed in the everyday life of the Egyptians. The desperate effort of people to escape from the authoritarian state treatment, resulted to new riots and the fall of Morsi this time. But again, it seems that Egypt is facing a dead end, walking towards a disastrous civil war similar to that in Syria. Some people have given their lives, and no one knows how many others will be sacrificed, but for what purpose?

We know very few things for the situation now in Libya, which seems that is left in chaos. No one seems to be interested for the fortunes of people, but only for the oil and natural gas fields.

In Turkey, the intention of Erdogan to impose specific prohibitions, made people, especially young, to go out in the streets to protest. But, due to the different culture, Erdogan should normally had a different perception, compared to that of the Western leaders. However, he is another characteristic example of a leader who is unable to inspire a vision for the people and restricted from the one-dimensional economic perception of the neoliberal dictatorship. It is quite clear of how much hollow these prohibitions are, for the sake of Islamic culture because, on the other hand, Erdogan follows exactly the rules of the "new economy", which sacrifice everything for profit.

Traditional Islamic values, opposite to the passion for wealth and money lending at interest, totally incompatible with the Western lifestyle (promoted by the Turkish TV soap operas with the necessary particularities), have been lost a long time ago. However, Erdogan seems that he doesn't understand this reality and vainly tries to bring back the Islamic culture in Turkey. Besides, he didn't dare to challenge Turkish big media bosses instead of challenging people in the streets. He didn't dare to send the police to them.

The riots in Bulgaria is another characteristic case. People appear to be trapped between Right-wing governments and supposed Socialist governments, like the present one, which they adopt similar policies against the majority and for the benefit of the local economic oligarchy. Even the fear for the return of an old-type Communist regime, seems to be pointless.

In the European south, people are in trenches, defending and trying to save what they can. But in this case also, the "stagnating" situation is present and clear, confirmed by the fact that societies are unable to vision a totally different model of social organizing, at least for the present and in a massive level, and protest in the streets with economic-type requests which essentially belong to the totalitarianism of the neoliberal dictatorship. The pseudo-rationalism with which societies have been "poisoned" by this cultural totalitarianism, supposedly to prevent total destruction, in reality destroys human conquests of decades, and therefore, protests in the streets seem to be, at least, pointless too.

Someone could argue that these thoughts are rather simplified because the nature of riots is different in various countries, due to the different facts related mainly with the history and culture of each country. This might be true, but what about the commercials between live pictures of thousands of people in the Tahrir square in Egypt, for example? What do they mean? And, what about us, watching those people - and allow me to use another phrase of Badiou - like a spectacle? While at the same time, we, who taste all the consequences of the economic crisis, become a spectacle for others?

This cultural totalitarianism is like a powerful tool which aligns everything in the same direction. It cuts everything in a minimum size and impose itself. Thus, the question-mark in the headline of this text seems to be justified. Are we indeed living in the age of stagnating revolutions? Or, are these only riots that lead to nowhere? People who sacrifice their lives for nothing?

Comments

  1. For what is worth, although I'm far from being a living fossil, at my age (50+) I've seen many things.

    People will try to avoid reaching to extremes for as long as possible. They will put up to all sorts of abuses, just so as not to rock the boat.

    And then, one day, for something seemingly trivial, they explode. The question is what happens after that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, nice to see you back. Well, I think it happens already. Today, people died in Egypt. What is more extreme than this? Of course I understand your thought, because we don't have yet "uncontrolled" massive riots in many countries simultaneously.

      Well maybe this is the case. In such a populated planet, first time in history, we need to see massive riots in many countries to reach a critical mass which will make the difference.

      But I wonder as you, what happens after that because there is no alternative even in theoretical level in people's minds. This is the key issue here. This cultural totalitarianism spreads everywhere, erasing every other alternative. More and more people are thinking through its terms, especially new generations.

      We need an alternative, truly radical, in order to return back to the real evolution as humanity.

      Delete
  2. How many times and in how many places did peasants in Medieval times rise up against their lords? I don't think the present situation is new. Revolutions by definition, unless it's a leadership revolution (basically a coup, or what has been happening in Egypt), are likely to fail.

    Capitalism, like Feudalism, is strong enough to survive quite a number of revolutions. Things will change if the conditions and the culture of the population change. Like the rise of the cities and the new economic power of the bourgeois that lead to end of Feudalism.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Confirmed: Alex Jones' popularity rises after Infowars banning from social media

globinfo freexchange
We wouldn't expect to be confirmed so fast on this.
A few days ago in the article IT and social media supergiants have just made Alex Jones a hero in the eyes of the ultra-conservative audience, we wrote that Alex Jones' wet dream has just become reality thanks to the combined move by Facebook, Apple, YouTube and Spotify to ban Infowars. These private IT and social media companies couldn't give a better gift to him right now. At a time where Infowars was going through a saturated period according to the best scenario, the corporate giants actually saved it with that stupid(?) strategy.
Suddenly, a corporate branch of the liberal establishment gave real value to Alex Jones' awful performance, pretending to be the 'anti-establishment' hero - just like Donald Trump - and made him a real hero in the eyes of the ultra-conservative audience that has been brainwashed by his absurd conspiracy theories.
Only a couple of days later, Kyle Kulinski of the…

Corporate media begin typical operations to make progressives comply with the establishment

The operations will multiply and become more aggressive towards 2020
globinfo freexchange
Corporate media of the ultra-conservative side made already a ridiculous attempt to present Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as totally unreliable. In the video, TYT hosts analyze very well the specific strategy followed by Conservative Review TV.
The strategy is quite simple: you create a fake video, you upload it on social media and after being watched by thousands you admit that it was created for satire purposes. Yet, the propaganda will be definitely effective because only a small portion will notice that this was satire. Most of the viewers (especially from the conservative audience that has been heavily brainwashed for decades to love corporate America and believe whatever comes from the Fox apparatus) will believe whatever transmitted from the ultra-conservative propaganda machine.
But the corporate media of the liberal side have a very big problem right now. It is almost impossible to start an open …

While you've been occupied with that Infowars-banning story, the establishment machine already started a covert censorship operation against leftist independent media

globinfo freexchange
Developments are coming like storm. Just when the prediction that Infowars banning will actually strengthen Alex Jones' popularity became true, it seems that our second 'prophecy' (and prediction by many progressives), also becomes true. According to this, Infowars banning will be used as a blueprint by the establishment machine to shutdown progressive independent media and voices, based on that 'fake news' narrative.
We wrote that a corporate branch of the liberal establishment gave real value to Alex Jones' awful performance, pretending to be the 'anti-establishment' hero - just like Donald Trump - and made him a real hero in the eyes of the ultra-conservative audience that has been brainwashed by his absurd conspiracy theories.
Max Blumenthal speaks with Aaron Mate and gives details about Alex Jones' dark role in the whole story:
Alex Jones has always served establishment priorities. First, by taking the 9/11 truth movement, whi…

‘I knew and approved the assassination of Maduro’ claims TV show host

globinfo freexchange
Peruvian journalist Jaime Bayly claimed in his TV show Bayly, that he was aware and had personally approved the attempted assassination of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.
"My reliable sources have called me and told me 'on Saturday we will assassinate Maduro' and I told them 'do it'," he said in his show and added: "When they asked me if I would condemn their move I replied that if they want I can buy them another drone."
Referring to Maduro, the journalist called him to be on alert. "My friends," he said, "are very capable, they have already scared you and there are more to come".
In a press conference, Maduro wondered how it is possible a host of a show in the US stating openly that he was aware of the attempted assassination.
Info from:
https://info-war.gr/gnoriza-kai-enekrina-ti-dolofonia-madoyro-ischyrizetai-paroysiastis-sto-maiami/

Meanwhile, Venezuelan Attorney General, Tarek William Saab, announced Wedn…

How normal human behavior became a false mental disorder epidemic

globinfo freexchange
In the early nineties, an epidemic of mental disorder was sweeping America and Britain. It had been uncovered by a new system for identifying disorders. Psychiatry had been attacked for relying on the personal and fallible judgement of psychiatrists.
But instead, a new objective method based on checklists had been invented. These listed only the objective symptoms, and deliberately did not enquire into why the individuals felt an anxiety. In the late 80s, nationwide surveys had revealed an incredible picture: more than 50% of Americans suffered from mental disorders.
But at the very same, the drug companies had announced that they had created a new type of drug, called an SSRI, which they claimed, targeted the circuits inside the brain that were causing these malfunctions. The SSRIs were marketed under names like "Prozac". What they did was alter the amounts of serotonin that flowed across the circuit connections within the brain, and they readjusted the …

The US empire was always conducting trade wars that even included deliberately created cartels

globinfo freexchange
Donald Trump is using his trade wars to support the part of the US capital that has heavily lost from free trade globalization, which is more powerful than ever in our days. This is also part of the Trump agenda to persuade Americans for his "patriotic devotion" based on his "America First" slogan.
The reality is that the US empire was always conducting trade wars that included not only tariffs on specific products, but even deliberately created cartels.
In the early 90s the Clinton administration uncritically adopted the neoliberal doctrine from Ronald Reagan and continued the big fraud against the majority of the Americans.
On the one hand, the Clinton administration was selling the big fairy tale of neoliberalism to the American public: free market capitalism would bring prosperity for all through that trickle-down fiasco. And it was translated, as always, in further cuts in public spending - more tax-cuts for the super-rich. On the other hand, …

Why the rapidly escalating and most disgusting propaganda against Jeremy Corbyn is actually a good sign

failed evolution
In the UK front, the liberal establishment machine is escalating its propaganda campaign against Jeremy Corbyn through that 'anti-Semitic' smearing. In reality, his only 'crime', of course, is that he is too lefty for the totally-occupied-by-neoliberalism Britain.
After the collapse of that ridiculous Skripal case - that ended to an embarrassing fiasco for the Western clowns - the establishment machine in the UK gave up its campaign to smear Jeremy Corbyn as a Russian stooge.
The new 'brilliant strategy' of the establishment tools is simply to paint Jeremy Corbyn as 'anti-Semite'. Which is actually the permanent smearing by the mainstream media and the liberal political center - many have been bought by the Israeli lobby- against anyone who has the ‘audacity’ to condemn the Israeli crimes against Palestinians.
The logical leap in this case is literally ridiculous: if you condemn the Israeli crimes against Palestinians, immediately means tha…

Retired US army colonel implies that a war with Iran could start with a Vietnam-type false flag operation

globinfo freexchange
After Tucker Carlson brought additional embarrassment to the pseudo-Left warmongering liberals with his anti-war positions, he tried to make Trump appear, more or less, as a kind of peace defender. He was joined by Douglas Macgregor, a retired US Army Colonel.
Both Carlson and Macgregor attempted to blame Trump's warmongering officials and the war lobby for the fact that another devastating war, this time with Iran, becomes more and more possible. The truth is slightly different because Trump has enormous responsibilities for this development too. He was from the start very hostile against Iran, he did everything in his power to kill the Iran nuclear deal and put the most bloodthirsty, anti-Iran neocons in key positions.
Yet, it would be worth to focus on a peculiar statement by Macgregor at the end of this short interview. As he said:
           You and I know that there are lot of people who would welcome conflict with Iran, that's obvious. I think the presi…

WikiLeaks paper shows France & UK pioneers behind Libya breakup

On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for over 30 thousand emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private email server while she was Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014. 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. More PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016, and a set of additional 995 emails was imported up to February 2, 2018.
globinfo freexchange
A letter from Clintons' top advisor Sidney Blumenthal to Hillary Clinton in early March, 2012, reveals that two of the Western neocolonial powers, France and UK, were trying to breakup Libya in order to secure a privileged place upon the Libyan corpse for their big companies. It appears that both Sarkozy and Cameron, as well as their intelligence services, were working closely…

The establishment tools have recently eliminated a very promising progressive - here is how they did it

globinfo freexchange
In the following video, Kyle Kulinski describes how he schooled Fox tools on progressive policies. The debate was set up on the occasion of another 'interview' (4:18 - 5:22 in the video) in which Cori Bush appeared to be quite unprepared to deal with Fox’s aggressive style. Unfortunately, shortly after this ugly attack, Cori Bush, a very promising progressive, lost in primaries, and 'surprisingly', most of the establishment media (both liberal and conservative), indirectly welcomed the result with a kind of relief.


Many progressives reacted with a kind of embarrassment on Cori Bush's response, yet in reality she did nothing wrong. It was certain tactics by the Fox tool that made Bush appear unreliable, and in this case, these tactics were (unfortunately) successful.
Examine again the video.
First of all, the Fox tool literally invaded in the place and started aggressively asking questions to Cori Bush about that tax issue. The tactic is very common…